EPTOn February 12 2009 08:02 Mikilatov wrote:
1680x1050, here.
1680x1050, here.
[H] Screen resolution survey - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Jonoman92
United States9111 Posts
| ||
|
Spartan
United States2030 Posts
| ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
| ||
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
| ||
GTR
51715 Posts
| ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
On February 12 2009 08:21 IntoTheWow wrote: 1024 x 768 (square) I use this i use this as well... fuck my shitty monitor. | ||
|
Malongo
Chile3479 Posts
On February 12 2009 14:34 404.Nitrogen wrote: i use this as well... fuck my shitty monitor. i love my shitty monitor. | ||
|
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
Yes I browse with a fullscreen window, but I can browse 2 at once  Yes SC2 should have widescreen support. When you buy a computer these days, they all come with widescreen monitors. Youd really be screwing with a lot of people if it wasnt supported. | ||
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
I hope that sc2 has widescreen support, but then again, i would be okay if it only had 2 resolutions: one for a 4:3, and one for widescreen. that way having better equipment doesn't help you at all. | ||
|
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
x2  Getting the video card for this to work is pretty tough. | ||
|
hazz
United Kingdom570 Posts
| ||
|
CosmicAC
United States238 Posts
and, why would they even consider not including widescreen support? | ||
|
LaSt)ChAnCe
United States2179 Posts
 | ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
Everytime I see someone with 1280x800 on a 14-15 inch laptop or 1440x900 on 17 inch, I just wanna punch them in the face. Even 1440x900 sucks on a 14 inch laptop. I'm pretty pissed that 1400x1050 is phased out of the market. i wouldn't be able to live with the browser maximized. | ||
|
Tadzio
3340 Posts
| ||
|
geometryb
United States1249 Posts
| ||
|
Not_Computer
Canada2277 Posts
used to be 1024x768 next up 5120x4096 or 5760x3600 | ||
|
x89titan
Philippines1130 Posts
| ||
|
Puosu
7117 Posts
Does this mean that the widescreen users will be able to see more than the smaller monitors or just that they see the same but differently?.. I mean, like, everything is fat as hell or? ehh ._. | ||
|
MasterReY
Germany2708 Posts
On February 12 2009 08:11 aseq wrote: 1920 x 1200. it's also not in there... this | ||
| ||
