• Log InLog In
• Register

[H] Screen resolution survey - Page 3

Post a Reply Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All

Jonoman92 United States9107 Posts February 12 2009 04:24 GMT #41 On February 12 2009 08:02 Mikilatov wrote: 1680x1050, here.

Spartan United States2030 Posts February 12 2009 04:37 GMT #42 Added a third poll.

Myrmidon United States9452 Posts February 12 2009 04:43 GMT #43 I use 1400x1050, the highest my 15" laptop supports.

Kinky United States4126 Posts February 12 2009 04:52 GMT #44 It's hard to find a new game nowadays that doesn't have both standard and widescreen resolutions.

GTR 51574 Posts February 12 2009 05:29 GMT #45 1680x1050 on a 22' LCD

Nitrogen United States5345 Posts February 12 2009 05:34 GMT #46 On February 12 2009 08:21 IntoTheWow wrote: 1024 x 768 (square) I use this i use this as well... fuck my shitty monitor.

Malongo Chile3472 Posts February 12 2009 05:57 GMT #47 On February 12 2009 14:34 404.Nitrogen wrote: Show nested quote + On February 12 2009 08:21 IntoTheWow wrote: 1024 x 768 (square) I use this i use this as well... fuck my shitty monitor. i love my shitty monitor.

Fen Australia1848 Posts February 12 2009 06:11 GMT #48 1280x1024 x2 monitors Yes I browse with a fullscreen window, but I can browse 2 at once Yes SC2 should have widescreen support. When you buy a computer these days, they all come with widescreen monitors. Youd really be screwing with a lot of people if it wasnt supported.

GHOSTCLAW United States17042 Posts February 12 2009 06:15 GMT #49 I think that surfing the internet fullscreen is dependent on how large your monitor is. I know that when i'm at home/have a 30" monitor at my disposal, I don't use the whole screen to browse. But when i'mat school on a 19", then i need to fullscreen. I hope that sc2 has widescreen support, but then again, i would be okay if it only had 2 resolutions: one for a 4:3, and one for widescreen. that way having better equipment doesn't help you at all.

GHOSTCLAW United States17042 Posts February 12 2009 06:15 GMT #50 On February 12 2009 13:24 Jonoman92 wrote: Show nested quote + On February 12 2009 08:02 Mikilatov wrote: 1680x1050, here. x2 Getting the video card for this to work is pretty tough.

hazz United Kingdom570 Posts February 12 2009 06:28 GMT #51 1024 x 768 representin' yo

CosmicAC United States238 Posts February 12 2009 06:33 GMT #52 1440x900 and, why would they even consider not including widescreen support?

LaSt)ChAnCe United States2179 Posts February 12 2009 07:04 GMT #53 i have two different monitors running different res's, there should be an option for this

Kentor United States5784 Posts February 12 2009 07:18 GMT #54 1400x1050 on a 12" thinkpad, and 1680x1050 on 20" desktop monitor. Neither is an option -_-. Everytime I see someone with 1280x800 on a 14-15 inch laptop or 1440x900 on 17 inch, I just wanna punch them in the face. Even 1440x900 sucks on a 14 inch laptop. I'm pretty pissed that 1400x1050 is phased out of the market. i wouldn't be able to live with the browser maximized.

Tadzio 3340 Posts February 12 2009 08:03 GMT #55 I tend to go with the max resolution my monitors can display. 1280x800 on my laptop. 1024x768 on my PC. Fullscreen browser on my PC, windowed browser on my laptop. One of these days I'll scrap my ancient PC monitor for one that can display a massive resolution, but prolly not anytime soon. This piece of crap serves it's purpose and still doesn't have any dead pixels.... so I'll save my money and deal with its dinky max-resolution.

geometryb United States1249 Posts February 12 2009 08:19 GMT #56 1920x1080

Not_Computer Canada2277 Posts February 12 2009 08:34 GMT #57 1280x1024 used to be 1024x768 next up 5120x4096 or 5760x3600

x89titan Philippines1130 Posts February 12 2009 09:10 GMT #58 1440x900 laptop

Puosu 7012 Posts February 12 2009 19:32 GMT #59 On February 12 2009 08:31 Chuiu wrote: Show nested quote + On February 12 2009 08:19 liger13 wrote: their adding widescreen?... No. They're adding widescreen. Does this mean that the widescreen users will be able to see more than the smaller monitors or just that they see the same but differently?.. I mean, like, everything is fat as hell or? ehh ._.

MasterReY Germany2708 Posts February 12 2009 19:45 GMT #60 On February 12 2009 08:11 aseq wrote: 1920 x 1200. it's also not in there... this

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All

Please log in or register to reply.