SCCL - DAY 3 - Page 26

{ToT}Strafe

Thailand7026 Posts

November 07 2005 07:43 GMT

#501

On November 07 2005 16:06 NewYorkHardCore wrote:

I totally agree, Magic Phil is extremely annoying and types like a crackhead without complete sentences.
Besides Strafe should also get banned from the forums according to forum rules.

ASking for a ban is like asking for a yellow card in a soccer game.

ParasitJonte

Sweden1768 Posts

November 07 2005 07:45 GMT

#502

the myth about big feet = big penis was partially "proven" by some russian fellows who conducted a survey of enough ppl for it to be accurate in russia (I think) and of course prolly elsewhere in the world as well.

The formula derived from their research was that you take your feets lenght and add 0.05m to it and then divide by 2. The result will be your penis lenght. It's correct for 9/10 males according to these russians, and you gotta trust russians :o! Works for me too ;]

If you want sources for the IQ stuff I give you this:

"The Inequality Taboo*
Charles Murray
When the late Richard Herrnstein and I published The Bell Curve eleven years ago, the furor over its discussion of ethnic differences in IQ was so intense that most people who have not read the book still think it was about race. Since then, I have deliberately not published anything about group differences in IQ, mostly to give the real topic of The Bell Curve—the role of intelligence in reshaping America’s class structure—a chance to surface.
The Lawrence Summers affair last January made me rethink my silence. The president of Harvard University offered a few mild, speculative, off-the-record remarks about innate differences between men and women in their aptitude for high-level science and mathematics, and was treated by Harvard’s faculty as if he were a crank. The typical news story portrayed the idea of innate sex differences as a renegade position that reputable scholars rejected.
It was depressingly familiar. In the autumn of 1994, I had watched with dismay as The Bell Curve’s scientifically unremarkable statements about black IQ were successfully labeled as racist pseudoscience. At the opening of 2005, I watched as some scientifically unremarkable statements about male-female differences were successfully labeled as sexist pseudoscience. - - -"

So in other words google for Charles Murray and The Bell Curve. You will prolly find the huge article I got that he wrote september 2005.

Though I do agree that I don't think there is much if any difference in intelligence between the colours of ppl on the earth when class and upbringing is brought into perspective. Math and language are two parts that are heavily affected by what the subjects has been taught - not his innate cognitive ability in those areas.

And even if one were to argue that since white have been ahead of blacks for so long when it comes to science and industry etc you still ahve to face the fact that those centuries are snapshots in evolution and the likelyhood of asians being shorter because of anything else than what they have eaten, blacks having lower IQ because white have evolved past them - are very very small.

I wouldn't go so far as to call these racial generalisations facts either... The overlapping inbetween "races" are so many and so great that it would just look bad. It's more interesting to discuss sex differences since those have evolved from day one of our specie and can be proclaimed as actual factual generalisations that work all around the world and have little or nothing to do with upbringing and society and what consequences they have on us -_-

{ToT}Strafe

Thailand7026 Posts

November 07 2005 07:45 GMT

#503

On November 07 2005 15:35 logitech wrote:

Show nested quote +

those are racism to the extreme, nevertheless you should judge one by individual characteristics and behaviours, not by race.

Fine I will now judge every asian invidually to conclude afterwards they have a smaller penis on average.

Show nested quote +

those are biased, and those research can lead to degrees of racism, such as hiring a white guy than a black guy because the white "might" be smarter according to bullshit reports, that is not true in any way, like i said,it should be judged by character not race.

Ofcourse very source that is in disagreement with you is biased. If it leads to racism it does not change the outcome of a test.

Show nested quote +

99% of the time hacking is not money involved, doesnt make it ok to use it based on "its just internet"

yes it is

Show nested quote +

whatever help you to grow your e-penis.

Breavman

Sweden598 Posts

November 07 2005 07:46 GMT

#504

Ok, but that doesn't have anything to do with biological differences between races.

edit: to drones post

BigshoT

United States171 Posts

November 07 2005 07:50 GMT

#505

It's sad the thread is now talking about the generalization of an entire race's penis size.

This is what should be done:
oG) and ToT) both should lose points. oG) clearly abused the rules and ToT) clearly acted like immature, racist pricks.

AnDrEi[CLF]

Romania64 Posts

November 07 2005 07:57 GMT

#506

nono.. quiet.. i want to learn some science things about my dick

{ToT}Strafe

Thailand7026 Posts

November 07 2005 07:59 GMT

#507

thx to repeat 100 others again bigshot <3

Liquid`Drone

Norway28647 Posts

November 07 2005 08:07 GMT

#508

breavman I never said anything about biological differences (apart from muscles and penis size which is a biological difference caused by african women developing larger butts and more fat around the crotch area because that's the best way to store food or something I dunno the details but I was once educated on this)

but yes, black people in america generally have better genes for building muscle and they also have lower iq. this is partially caused by biological differences due to slavery breeding muscular people instead of thinkers, and partially caused by black people generally being less wealthy than white people (and asians. )

stating this does not make me racist, because I'm not claiming that blacks or asians or whites are inferior to one another, I'm only stating that they are not entirely equal, which they obviously are not, but those differences are not caused by "race" but simply because black people, asians and whites have lived in different environments for the past couple thousand years.

asians are growing taller now that they are getting a more western lifestyle and eating more western food, IQ scores are growing all over the world as a consequence of improved education, which shows that the differences are not inherently racial but consequences of different environments, but that does not mean asians blacks and whites are currently EQUAL. equally GOOD, yes, but not equal.

Breavman

Sweden598 Posts

November 07 2005 08:39 GMT

#509

Ok good answer drone. I didn't think anything you posted were racist, just asked cause it's an interesting subject. The part about black people in america makes sense, but I still doubt anybody has accurately tested for inherited differences in IQ since culture, economic situation etc is so important and you can never know which is which. That education will make you score better on IQ-tests is of course true.

TreK

Sweden2089 Posts

November 07 2005 08:40 GMT

#510

my info is right, ur all wrong...especially drone since he is norweigan and we all know how to sink a norweigan sub

ROOTCatZ

Peru1226 Posts

November 07 2005 11:26 GMT

#511

I agree with eri but I do believe ur going to extremely old facts, so i dont think that's relevant anymore, every species adecuates to the place they live, black people's originally black cuz that's a way to protect skin from the sun, they need that from where they orginally come from, as well as bigger nose, etc etc, for different reasons of the enviroment, process happens trough millions of years BUT! u cant say human race, in general have the same iq as an insect or wild animal, so, being this stated, I think asian at least might have iq differences because it is known, tho not fully proven they have evolved as they are from a different kind of ape or w/e its name is in english :D, this forum has gotten so off topic rofl

1tym

Korea (South)2425 Posts

November 07 2005 11:36 GMT

#512

On November 07 2005 14:01 {ToT}Strafe wrote:

Show nested quote +

If I remember correct there was a report about various researches about the iq among people. They tested all kinds of things, wether people had an higher iq in relatively cold areas compared to warmer areas, if there was a difference between races, if taller people have a higher iq opposed to smaller people etc. If I can remember well people from black origin were slightly below western europe origin and asians were also below but not as much as black

I searched for this again, but its no longer in their archive or im searching in the wrong place. So Ill shut up about this until I found it

and I want to say this just 1 more time, I do not care what the results of the tests were cuz all humans are equal ok?:!)

I'm not saying it is true nor necessarily agree with it, but according to bell curve, even though the theory has caused some controversies,

<East Asians whether in America or in Asia are more intelligent than white Americans, who are more intelligent than African-Americans and European-Americans.>

http://niazi.com/Neurons/bell.htm

Even the 100 ethnic groups / seven intelligences model contains some useful truths. First, in the study of human biodiversity, as in any other science, there is a constructive tension, ultimately amounting to a symbiosis, between encyclopedically tabulating all genetic differences and devising parsimonious theories to cluster people according to their genetic similarities. The encyclopedist's glass is half full of fascinating ethnic anomalies that don't fit broad-brush racial theories. For example, the average Jewish IQ seems to surpass the average overall white IQ by as much as 17 points. Simultaneously, the theorist can half-fill his glass with sweeping racial patterns. For instance, he can frugally sum up much of the biodiversity that's blatantly obvious in America with Rushton's Rule: On most physical, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions, the West African and Northeast Asian averages lie at opposite extremes, with the white average in the mediocre middle.

http://www.isteve.com/jensen.htm

Hot_Bid

Braavos36374 Posts

November 07 2005 11:39 GMT

#513

according to this study by 1tym, korea > all

iNcontroL

USA29055 Posts

November 07 2005 11:43 GMT

#514

korea 34-0 all ez

Veg

Canada2945 Posts

November 07 2005 12:04 GMT

#515

Dear Strafe,

OH SNAP
warbucket never fails to deliver

strafe stop with the bigotry & faggotry

taDa

575 Posts

November 07 2005 14:42 GMT

#516

Wow, this thread went from day 3 predictions to the Sea vs. ToT) B.S. to results to back and forth fruitless banter to results to Strafe's Asians have small penises, which for the most part is true. Thanks for the link Eri. Ha! Always knew:

Blacks > Whites > Mellow Yellow People

If they don't ban all the culprits from Sea this season then something is wrong. Case in point it was their neglect that cost them this. People can say whatever they want, but when you try to pull something over another teams head like this in a money 'league' strick measures should be taken.

Something similar to the WGT rules. If caught account sharing/hacking they should be banned from the season and all matches should be reversed if proven guilty. I am not picking sides, but Sea/oG) should not get off easy. If they do I think the other teams should protest.

[X]Ken_D

United States4650 Posts

November 07 2005 15:16 GMT

#517

In USA, asians on average are a lot well off financially than whites. Universities in California are half populated with asians even though asians are still a minority overall in California.

It's not the size of the penis that counts, its the sexy model that you stick it into

Close thread. Thanks.
It was fun reading about ToT vs Sea.Cheaters until people started to discuss beyond the scope of the game (racism).

b(O.o)p

699 Posts

November 07 2005 17:14 GMT

#518

well well....funny thread, really funny!

asla

Japan354 Posts

November 07 2005 18:44 GMT

#519

so what ive read here, its perfectly ok for tot to flame other teams like ig and og as much as they want, but its not ok for other teams to say anything of tot or the koreans to say anything of any other team, aye got that.. nice logic -.-

strafe you said that your "japan > korea" comment got them going, well big surprise? maybe if you had listened to your teachers at history lessons or even read something yourself you would understand that this wasnt propably the most clever line to say, dont say you were surprised how it got them going tard..

LogaiN

Sweden1073 Posts

November 07 2005 18:51 GMT

#520

Let's not forget that the whole IQ-concept (and therefore the test to measure it) is a construction from the "west", which means that it in several aspects they are pretty discriminating even before the test starts. Let's look at an example. In most IQ-test, when examining the spatial ability, the room is often quadratic, rectangular etc. which fits very well into the society we live in (houses, streets etc.). But in Africa for example, the "environmental" lines are way more "curvy", which makes them better at that kind of spatial recognition. But in the tests, there is often just the kind of "western" spatial room, which makes the test pretty useless unless they get more "balanced".

I'm not saying that there are no differences, there sure are. But it's pretty good to make a intercultural notion about it. Environmental issues, how to define IQ from the very beginning to make it measurable across cultures.

Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 32 Next All

Please or register to reply.

SCCL - DAY 3 - Page 26

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming