And the news stations and online media, have become an intensified maelstrom. The USA have yet to finalize the election. And the official narrative of liberal media reaches as far as my country, South Africa.
Meanwhile online, Multiple Facebook profiles berate and kurse me over chat and wall commentary, as they find delectable pleasure to gloat that I put my confidence in the wrong party. yet, we'll see..
PS: I am co-writing this ad hoc and as fast as possible, with a fellow friend whom you've possibly met via anecdote. He has a strong finance background and an adequate grasp of the social & political scene:
BLUE LIBERTY VS THE EQUALIZER MOVEMENT
The media personnel and members of press, speak of the struggle with a hint of equivocal doubt.. but still in there usual fashion of bolstered vanity.
The official narrative more or less, that not even fringe folk are keen to unsay.. is the agreement that the strife, is The Left Versus The Right. It is THIS polarity that we'll address and hopefully find new meaning, as you'll soon discover, there's potential depth for much greater interpretation.
The so-called left-wing VS the right-wing. Both sides have an unwavering impression of the other, and both have an array of generalized insults and ammunition, ready to wave aloud at each other in spiteful anger. But it's no good if the people remain frozen, and stuck within a dead-end cul de sac of bickering amongst themselves over the internet. I hope to advance forward and introduce new developments in this writing, that'll serve as an ancillary increment to foreseeable discussion!
Currently as it stands..
The right-wing people are being accused of having some tribal disposition, lent from some alleged prejudice... and,
The left-wing people are called 'liberals' and a number of other unpleasing things.
So many words are been thrown around the public squares, that I can safely afford to insert a new term into the scene. The 'Equalizer Movement'.
The 'Equalizer Movement' is a term we've coined to define a certain brand of radical - and often inimical - attitude within the liberal strata, and describes any devotee thereof, with concise accuracy.. but that explanation will come later.
inimical : Not friendly
Viz. An 'Equalizer'
FOR THE ACADEMY
This delivery, might take the form of academic discussion. The word academic means that the piece will make its way into an academy, or some vaunted seminary hoping to stand resolute upon a shelf, amongst other dry exchanges of information.
We steadily begin, to discuss sensitive things, and de facto end up choosing a side as a result.
For this, As we vocalize our position midst the disparate people upon this planet.. I suddenly become aware of my inner self-possession... and maybe a hint of danger.
What trade-off is there not worth sacrificing to be some hero?
There is a risk, most assuredly! Of that... we're timely aware. But do not interpret this as an act of bravery, but rather the blind hope that if we encounter unwelcoming people, they should rather scorn us, than consign us to the historical flame, or graveyard.
It is not ridiculous to remark the nature of the people we seek to address, as wayward and senseless.. as they've proven to capably have recourse to destruction and cruel sabotage.
As it is.. we take the risk and commit to our viewpoint, and if the deliberation of our manner seems vaunted, and somehow does elicit feelings of anger inviting suppression.. we hope to simply be branded as yet another bunch of doddering old fools... a gaggle of insufferable know-it-alls.
The word we introduce to the theme here is 'Liberal', and the concept Liberalism. At some point we'll junction this to Conservatism.. or rather the definition of Right-wing.
But beware of those two words, because both have managed to become an inverted anathema of grudge and dread.
What is that word? that it somehow calls to mind a group of agitators who've taken to the street aloud in protest.
The next blithe assumption, that our inveterate minds tend to make, would be a categorical stamp of the word 'Left-Wing'. The current democratic party, we believe, no longer falls under the category of left-wing
Today, commentators, media personalities and news anchors, all use the word Left-wing without scruple, describing the Democratic party and their actions as justified under the understanding accompanied by the presumed label.
All their underlings and derived members, are deemed Left, and even their opposition use this word to denote them.
We speak of equality, and vested political destiny.
By the name itself, de jure there is an assumed trend within the Democratic Party, hoping to steer the country towards a state of emphatically believing in the voting process.
It is through this process that a conclussion of Equality is reached.
Equality is conferred on a person by the weight of their individual vote, and through the fairness of the justice system, as they stand equal in stature, in event of a Trial.
OF THE REPUBLIC
The republican party, by their duties - and according to Right-Wing definition - aim to safeguard the established Republic and protect the constitution and its perduring embodiment, from enemy attacks or subversion. That being the physical structure and the actual established installation donned with ornate decorum. And so too, the unmarred constitution must naturally stay intact..
keeping to its known form, as it was when assembled long ago, after the US broke free from the economic tendrils of Britain.
[ DEFINITION ]
Right-wing: Believing in or supporting tenets of the political right.
Those who support political, social or economic conservatism; those who believe that things are better left unchanged.
[ DEFINITION ]
Conservatism: A political or theological orientation advocating the preservation of the best in society and opposing radical changes
As we approach the definition of the supposed Blue Left-Wing party, the issue of public welfare does arise... and so too the possibility of branching off into socialism.. and so inturn communism. But that additional blither we've set aside for a sequel article.
[ DEFINITION ]
Left-wing : Those who support varying degrees of social, political or economic change designed to promote the public welfare
FLUIDIC and CRYSTALIZED
It could be said..
That the Blue party, has created a semblance of embodied action, encouraged by most of the Democratic Statesmen, that aims to constantly uphold a system of institutionalized function, that actively seeks to engage the Republican government, and thereby keep it in check. As in providing a rival force of contention, through the auspices of progressive activism and similar people of liberal-mindedness.
I say 'liberal' there denoting the usage of the official definition, which'll appear in a moment.
As it is..
a Right-Wing entity and the long-standing Republic itself, could be considered as the Crystallized aspect of government..
While the Left-Wing is seen as Fluidic.
Fluidic, volatile, and vibrant. Fervent and slightly incorrigible at times. But ultimately a party of people who advocate the promotion of welfare for the people. Or simply provides a volatile opposition which would prevent the Republic government becoming a crystalized inertia. When left-wing people exist, they sometimes prevent establishments from becoming complacent or idle.
The advantage of the Left & Right wing polarity is that the Left will ensure the Right doesn't become stagnant.
The Right-Wing government, the Republic is the official embodiment of the initial state power, that originally bestowed Liberty upon the people, through the framework of the constitution. Our understanding be that the GOP - Grand Old Party, now in the light of democracy stands alongside an array of disparate parties, and is subject to the same rules of popular vote and democratic outcome decided by the population.
Forgive our absence of research.. but to our knowledge only the Blue Democrat party has gained a noticeable presence in the political strata, while other fringe, lesser routine-token parties do actually exist in America. Things like the Green movement, Socialist movement, possibly Communist movement. (??)
DISMANTLING THE SYSTEM DETAILS
Once again, remember the Right-wing objective and given duty is to make it their business to defend the constitution and protect it from being subverted or tainted.
In any event there's no doubt that if some opposing movement, gained a foothold within the administrative field of official government in the US, being voted in through legitimate favour, winning a high number of seats.. and then, proceeded to change the constitution. That could be interpreted as an act of subversion, even though it was done through the right channels.
Again finally, I highlight that this framework and structure, is a working system where Capitalism works alongside Democracy in a junctioned agreement, guided by the precepts of the Constitution.. The resultant outcome is the harmony of a Republic.
Somehow there is more fear of corruption within the ranks of the Red Republican party than there is among the Democrat establishment. it is not unthinkable that some cruel official could be unknowingly admitted into the ranks of the Republic Government and abuse their power. Such fears could arise in any person, especially since it's become a generalized impression to consider most conventional, patriotic men of the Republican party as symbols of military substance. Yet anything military can be easily re-interpreted as a form of 'oppression'.
It's kind of become a generalized trend.. to appear adverse to military authority, and comport oneself with an urban air of cosmopolitan pride, looking down upon men who hail from another atmosphere of traditional sentiment... or maybe even a rustic background.
And.. this notion - however indecorous - has created a nagging doubt within the minds of the people. A doubt that's caused a longstanding disregard for authority & law enforcement.
This theme has been instrumental in gathering support for the Blue Party to greater lengths, For in the eyes of the people, They appear on the scene, as some saviour making an overweening pledge. Promising to protect them from these unsmiling entities. called the military.
Another aspect of lifestyle that helps reinforce this narrative, are the overt elements that inspire surly belligerence in Rap Music. Everyone knows of that urban attitude, so pervasive today - causing the youth to comport their manner like someone of whom it be unwise to trifle with.
Other outlets of entertainment and consumable media have managed to propagate this theme, too.
With all that..
The Blue Party is understood to be the remedy and counter-current against the menace of law and military hierarchy.
...And much more.
Yet whatever the case,..
For now.. Consider the impression sensed when hearing the term Left-wing.
Consider the positive attributes called to mind when considering a young male journalist who's dutifully styled himself Left-Wing. In the urban setting of a park, cafe or coffee shop..
Observe the feelings and key words called to mind when an individual is considered left-wing: Innocuous, sensible, harmless, peaceable, non-interventionist, non-burly, modern, educated... journalist, intellectual.
For us, these words describe such an image of people.. or rather it usually does in a normalized setting.
The damning word liberal, is not so blissfully innocuous. Even the usage of the word is often avoided among liberals folk themselves.
Most people will not equip the word upon their profile. They'd sooner don an alternative identity, like: Progressive, Artisan, Vegan, Artist, Thespian, Innovator, Feminist. Activist...
Though such deduction seems to be persiflage, it isn't really so, and sooner or later the audience will encounter someone sporting those titles, and discover the underlying force of liberalism that drives them, fueling their passions, infusing their spirit... where upon they find your narrative disagreeable.
Whence came this occurance, when was the liberal character introduced into the scenery of Urban Byplay? When did they enter the meme-pool of our social-strata and planetary lifestream?
Something must've triggered the birth of this fashion & lifestyle.
Can someone trace the slow development of liberalism and how it steadily produced these intemperate characters comprising our generation?
On the other hand, if they're not lacking in temperance, they're simply lacking in the essence of vitality.. and a sort of saving-urgency. Almost always they're devoid of a certain conviction, which should manifest as self-possession. As if the resonant theme that accompanies them is instantly infectuous and disarming. All these conclusions are not passive-aggressive jabs aimed at any member of audience.
This phenomenon is evidenced by such an encounter, when they'd begin talking about Socialism. They somehow manage to make the idea of socialism become offensive to the health and senses.
The advocates of socialism and progress have ruined it by the very manner of their delivery.
It's unclear if history has ever known an oppressive government that was overthrown by the temerity of our current brand of inflated liberalism. But once again, many forms of Left-Wing people, exist and not all are intent on toppling established authority. Perhaps these folk are vestiges from some past regime... Surviving agitators once instrumental unto a glorious revolt, who survived emerging in numbers after victory - as a collateral aftermath - and so were able to pass on their meme to another generation.
A Meme in the truest sense, of memetic resilience, which would have preserved all their behavioural patterns, their lifestyle and the practice of Liberalism itself.
But this class of person, distinctive in manner, have existed for at least a hundred years or more. They're evidenced in many descriptive hints found within the ancillary works of George Orwell.
Concerning history, although referring to historical people and previous moments in time is sometimes unavoidable, we make an effort to never distract the audience with the past. We're of the opinion that History and recorded events are arguably immaterial. And they only matter, when seen through the lense of our generation, and illumed in the light of the incipient 21st century.
But we speak of history and famous left-wing revolutionists in the past..
It is not readily believable that our contemporary brand of 'liberal' is capable of hatching a diabolical scheme, or contrive plans of the same magnitude equal to the organized executions, seen in figures like Lenin.
EDIT: This is not a scoffing disappointment, declaring left-wing people, both timid & incapable of bringing down the known government in a bloodless covert manner. As I mentioned earlier we delayed the addressing of Communism and Socialism.
But as an afterthought I include some things here: Socialism, as its been adopted in certain successful first-world countries, takes the form of welfare and helpful support lent to the people. Rather than the strict definition, of a State, assuming control over private industry. Socialism wavers in format and implemented method.
While.. Communism is always usually a blind, sweeping wave of indiscriminate equalization conferred upon the people, on behalf of the Centralized control of state policy, and its government.
Finally it's important to remark the lack of welfare and social benevolence emanating from the Democrats,
and overt refusal of the House Speaker to work alongside the Administration for bail-out funding, to help those who
suffered during the Corona setback.
It's as if they're not deserving the title of being called 'Left-Wing'.
And this is based on the complete lack of verified result, that attests to any democrat official or endeavour helping the people, in a noticeable fashion.
By no means or fashion does word ever leak onto the street, or online chat, or over the phone dialogue, that speaks about noticeable meaningful change accomplished by the Democrats.
While conversely, you would not believe the numbers reached in figures, through the money they invested in this election.
And spare me the claim of any hearsay about Charity Organization - if that issue manages to come alight.
Yet another aspect, of progressive inefficiency and dishonesty, where within a CEO resides, siphoning money from the donations.
To reiterate clearly.. let's summon forth the definition of Liberalism:
Liberal : A person who favours a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties.
Liberalism : A political orientation that favours social progress by reform and by changing laws rather than by revolution.
Liberalism : An economic theory advocating free competition and a self-regulating market
And now, be sure to examine and remark the definition of Libertarianism.
libertarianism : Political philosophy that emphasizes the importance of personal liberty and political freedom, with strict limits on state activity.
Observe the discrepency there.. limiting state activity. Depriving the government of authority and rank.
The strange overlapping convergence steadily becomes clear..
which brings us to a concept that sores above all in its importance..
That is the concept of Economic Liberalism.
We cannot highlight that term enough! Economic Liberalism...
Economic Liberalism is defined as a system of rule where rich households and individuals control the government and land... (or the planet for that matter)
One can easily remark the absence of tax from that arrangement, and technically no embodiment of official authority able to intervene or meddle with the rulers of the state.
Economic Liberalism, when those two words are junctioned together, they form a term and idea on its own.
I'll repeat the definition of Liberalism and Liberal hereto:
Liberal : A person who favours a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties.
Liberalism : A political orientation that favours social progress by reform and by changing laws rather than by revolution.
Liberalism : An economic theory advocating free competition and a self-regulating market.
Do these words REALLY sound like our current brand of liberals found amongst the ranks of the Blue Democrat Party?
THE OTHER SCENARIO
So far, we're looking at two, easily identifiable divisions of people.
The ruling class of the Blue Democrat party, operating under the promise & guise of social welfare and democracy..
But in reality striving for Economic Liberalism.
and then.. the numerous ranks containing all the activists, fervent agitators and unlawful insurgents.
Who at times are known to - regrettably - bulldoze forward in violent manner, and by those means strive for Libertarianism.
So it appears, there really are different shades of class that form the disparate Left-Wing.
Some of them have been quite vocal of declaring war on Capitalism.
Ironically we saw now, the design of capitalism diluted via hint amongst the very definition of Liberalism itself, and we'll likely continue to see similar themes recurring anent the framework of Capitalism.
Capitalism: An economic system based on private ownership of capital.
I will note the one condition of Capitalism is that the people are compelled to part with a portion of their money for paying tax, which pays the government for their utility service and law enforcement.
It's a system that works. But it's also a system that cannot be left unregulated. For example, recall, the case when Microsoft was accused of aggressive business practice.
And can any one here present in the audience remark the cost of glasses frames lately?
PS : Incidentally Bill Gates remedied that situation by investing in Apple, something like $100 million dollars I think. By the act of reviving Apple and creating a healthy competition, Microsoft was no longer a monopoly, so the case was dropped.
There is a slight aversion to Capitalism felt by the people, whether knowingly or instinctually.
In a manner of instinct, every person knows that some kind of demand or integrated compromise is needed - from their part - to sustain their personal existence in society.
No government, no party or person would ever rescue someone from financial ruin.
Everyone knows that Capitalism has unaccountably created a certain imbalance, of regional division within the plains of households and living settlements. And the people divested of strength and rightful health, in their empoverished plight, are quite ready to place blame on private individuals, or public officials in government. But who could content that when politicians are eating ice-cream and boasting of delectable chocolate flavours?
Now.. in a free country, with the humaniterian principles of the 21st century put into circulation, with Capitalism allowing the concentration of untold wealth in the hands of individuals, with many laws protecting the media from reprisal, anent many lies & misinformation. Can you understand why such statesmen, wealthy journalists, wine-drinking housewives, amoral technocrats and vested bureaucrats would find pleasure through the combined auspices of Democracy and Capitalism? In a world where it's considered laughable to submit to a higher entity or spiritual authority.. where about 90% of consumable media takes the form of psychotic murder, lurid violence and sensual allurement?
It should now become apparent.. all these contrasts, and joined comparison..
the difference between an idealistic rebel-Libertarian and a nobly astute Left-Wing Journalist.
The difference between a normal, traditional businessman and an avaricious Capitalist disguised behind human rights, equalization, and the promise of freedom.
The difference between a stable, secure Republic.. and a vain semblance of Democracy, doused in glamour and hedonistic lifestyle.. yet truly controlled by Economic Liberalists, who through the dominion of the media, have in their power the ability to generate, any opinion or feeling, through the news they produce.
Another aspect we quickly touch upon - before we resume - is the sensational subterfuge of CryptoCurrency.
This is a perfect example of how amoral technocrats and trusted experts - devoid of scruple - are able to spin the most bogus concept in the history of 21st technology, as something promising and revolutionary.
A currency, a piece of money.. taking the form of nothing, but an abstract piece of meaningless information stored as data.
Of course the experts will argue - in dutiful ceremony - that it's a complex technology, only grasped by the finest minds, and will pave the way to some unprecedented revolution, against the monopoly of the secular banking systems.
It is not overwhelmingy ambitious to dismiss the entire scenario in a single gesture. That this virtual-currency is little more than unanimous people who've agreeably decided to confer value on something meaningless. And a virtual-currency that all the custodians and their respective henchmen, prophet from by making real money! Not some micky mouse, crypto-money!
Whatever country someone resides within, they'll always handle their local currency.
The progressive folk have lost all sight and means of bringing about national regeneration
MONEY IS REAL MONEY
A coin, or a note, an official printed piece of palpable paper, stamped with the approval of the respective nation.. marked with insignia of their country and rulers..
It is absolute, unquestionable decadence to hear of all the over-priced quality computer rigs, horded and stashed in some basement, mindlessly mining away, wearing away at a pointless meaningless algorithm.
The developers who propound CryptoCurrency do not admit the complete annihilation of wastage, over-kill, and resource lost through their 'progressive' endeavour. It became nothing more than an industry generating money (actual money) - at the expensive of naive people - under the seductive illusion of innovation, progress and future transitions.
And to this day, no one has satisfactorily answered why a multi-threading overblown 3D graphics card is needed to process the algorithm. I suspect that the pipeline of computation anent the algorithm is too small, and has a capped limit of computational avenue. An entry-level CPU is more than adequate for the task, I'm sure.
This here, CryptoCurrency and the BitCoin sensation is a perfect example of how to begin dismantling the illusive monopoly weaved by progressive technocrats.
And remember, real life money is proof of work and perspiration. A Crypto Proof-Of-Work is merely proof of a bolstered machined, sacrificed, and doomed to mindlessly process circuitous data.
We return to the mission at hand.
That mission - the main issue - is an issue that's been deliberately postponed for the sake of artful procrastination, as we could only afford to bring it up once we'd rightly gained the favour of the audience.
Is all this here seeming a non-sequitur... an arbitrary ramble? The issue, better left alluded to, begins to lose all currency, and substance... and all the machinations of intrigue when spoken aloud in haughty tone of overt recognition. But it can't be avoided much longer. It is... the issue of how the entire world cannot stand the currently elect status of President Trump.
All the things said before: the secular news, the entertainment industry, all online media and subsidiary sponsors... All their liberal underlings and zealot equalizers have become something of a histrionic nightmare.
And we ask you this, do you think that he's truly a dangerous, evil, inadequate man? Is it really believable to say President Trump is not equal to the task of being president? Being the Chief of Staff? No, there is something else going on. Something has happened which has derailed the whole establishment, to such an extent that they can't even think straight. Or they might've attempted something in their desperation that could backfire terribly.
Imagine, for centuries, our political statesmen were content to remain satisfied and idle, seated upon their royal thrones before the burning hearth, siphoning tax money from the public and living their lives in bountiful affluence and hedonistic luxury. Suddenly, 2016, it was not so much as unprecedented but just simply unexpected, President Trump won the election.
He appeared on the scene, and has since become a true Disruptive-Innovator, in the business-academic sense.
For the first time, the people have seen measurable results midst the byplay of daily life.
And, for the first time they have someone in office who cannot be bribed, bought, manipulated or intimidated.
The democratic party would be forced to either adapt and improve their game, or become obsolete, falling behind unable to rival new expections.
Consider the scenario, given the precipitous magnitude of disaster they incurred. The scope of all the commendable things accomplished by Trump, all things said and done, that have become impossible to suppress or render negative.
Do you think they would not fight to prevent their own extinction? Do you think it impossible that they wouldn't have recourse to the worst types of sabotage, and acts of subversion in the face of the looming displacement that president Trump might cause? Already, rumour semi-unconfirmed has arisen, attesting to illicit espionage performed on behalf
of the Democratic campaign.
But how can you harm, attack or resent the people you're supposed to protect, especially since your party is titled Democratic?
You wouldn't harm them, but perhaps you could mislead them and enlist their might & frenzy, to wage a war against the president and his supporters. A war which at times will manifest on the physical plain.
Midst the discontent, the media have in some fashion, succeeded in their aim to instill the idea into people, that Trump is to blame for all the dissension.
Through the application of "Impression Management", the news agencies can alter the perception of the people.
They can lead them to believe the Trump Campaign is untrustworthy and greedy.
Some people have already fallen to these affects and resultantly now see The Red Campaign through the same lense of the Blue Party.. overcome by similar rage and discontent.
They have applied the usage of the word blue, and convinced the people that President Trump is the embodiment of the arrogance contained in the definition:
blue : Belonging to or characteristic of the nobility or aristocracy.
PS: Blue is another word for 'conservative'.
And so, the equalizer movement proceeds forth to cut down those of higher stature down to size.
WHAT IS THE EQUALIZER MOVEMENT?
Who are these people who accuse others of having some tribal disposition based on prejudice.
What is a liberal? What inspires the so-called 'left' to be relentless in their struggle?
Is it the notion of liberty? They could be guided by the hope and vision that'll eventuate in the future, if they persist to struggle onwards.
Or there could be a certain instinctual pleasure they delight in whenever imposing the collective despotic force upon their enemies.
Maybe they believe with thoughtful hope that, in the end, they'll cease and uplift the burning blue flame of liberty. And likely they believe in the envisioned promise, made by the democrats of a bountiful destiny ahead.. in the non-specific future.
I don't think they'll ever wield the flame of liberty..
Oh verily.. Liberty.. burning with a different colour of fire light, and by no means, hot, red, intensified or zealous.
The 'flame of liberty' is a cerulean blue, strong enough to illuminate our path and warm the scene, but not so strong as to scorch or offend the eyes.
Our definition of liberty :
Personal freedom from servitude, confinement or oppression.
Those fair words, however incisive, don't have the strength to cause any faltering or self-abasement within the ranks of the Equalizer movement.
The reality of the situation is that those 3 things mentioned above are probably unavoidable features of everyday life! Even, manifesting in nature and civil byplay
Surely we're in submission to things like trees, sunlight, concrete structure, walls and doors, traffic lights, air conditioners, medical science... irrigation and sewerage systems?
Confinement exists everywhere, even when trapped behind a car that's blasting unregenerate rap music, or in a shop and Ed Sheeran is playing.
And oppression is an unavoidable future of civilization.
Does the priest not rightly oppress the person who's hit rock bottom?
When the Psychiatrist gives his diagnosis consigning one to the ward, was it without grounds?
Is it so bad? When the politician intervenes on behalf of the people to subdue criminal violence.. or a copper writes a speeding ticket?
Liberty is not basking in unabated freedom, under the sun and flames of blazen glory, that seemeth unfriendly to the person. Merciless, unconditional, unsparing to people on the planet.
Liberty is bestowed via the protective walls of civilization, that shields man from the forces of nature.
Liberty is not wayward and senseless, and achieved through fire, hatred and anarchy.
THE EQUALIZER MOVEMENT
All I perceive amongst the ranks of the democrat liberals, are a bunch of Equalizers.
For the reason, they use the idea of 'equality' as a passport to justify their aggressive intensity.
They believe, that by wielding the promise of freedom and 'equal status' therein, that their disposition gives them right to enforce Equalization on the world.
Behold.. The Equalizers, and their bold, singularly-minded quest for freedom and equality.
You cannot imagine the dimensions it has taken, and not only that... it has seeped into entertainment, music, recreation centres, academic seminaries, perhaps even ecclesiastical gatherings.
The personal mission of the Equalizer is to confront someone, and either, through the usage of force, infectuous transference or vocalized projection, they will attempt thereby to replace the nature of the accosted person, with their nature.
In essence, whatever nature, or unique aspects and memetic profile special to the individual, would be over-written by their meme of equalization.. and crushed by the despair they seek to impart.
They will not stop until they've poured their discontent and rage into the desired person, or at least gotten some hint of confirmed success.
That means all our talents, personal skills, dexterity and unique propensity are expected to be subdued in the interest of Equalization, or simply suppressed by a voluntary act of relinquishing our inner self-possession. They want you to equalize and THAT entails undergoing a process of self-abasement, and allowing a somatic current of guilt, histrionic despair and disenchantment to avail upon you. That is the act of equalizing. The Equalizer expects their enemies to undergo a surge of guilt and regret, a kind of paralysing disarmament!
Such is the sublime notion of meme transference.
OF BEING EQUAL AND UNEQUAL
And now, it occurs to the audience, as we reflect was there not a time when a person once admired another individual who they might've considered unequal to them? Hasn't there ever been some media personality, perhaps a Starcraft player or musician who left a favourable impression, to aspire towards?
Were these people not considered superior at that time, through their inspiration?
The Democrat party have enlisted the support of celebrities, who - despite the watchword of equality - are blindly adored in excess and idol-veneration.
The very people who provide the vicarious anodyne, to ease any heaviness weighing upon an anxious heart.. and incidentally, are untouched by any form of financial or economic setback.
In summation, we've spoken aloud on behalf of the right-wing party, and it be steadily clear, that their aim is to protect the existing infrastructure of life, and the social byplay contained within.
Civilization will inturn establish man in a position, were he can live in harmony, whether it be inside some urban joint or rural encampment..
It would be fatally imprudent to make reserve for any fanatic, who's willing to lay siege to cities, destroy installations and harm people.
It is semi-laughable to see those riotous agitators planning their next conspiratorial move, yet remarking to continue watching NetFlix..
They have no insight to the layers of trade that enable NetFlix.
Also they don't realize NetFlix is enabled by the same Capitalism they seek to undo.
They do not understand that that media service is an aspect of the pending realities incipient within the 21st century.
Recall, the definition of anarchism:
anarchism : A political theory favouring the abolition of governments.
Anarchy : (government) a state of lawlessness and disorder (usually resulting from a failure of government).
...and in the light of recent events, wouldn't you say that President Trump is more libertine, fluidic and left-wing, than the Economic Liberals of the Democrat Party?