Sincerely, the join date is more useful to classify people. I see myself looking at join dates all the time. "This HAS to be a post sc2 user"->check->95% of the times I'm right.

But some of the best users only have a few of posts (MDT anyone?), while some posters made over 1000 since the start of the beta.

So about the post count... I don't care.

HDstarcraft

United States577 Posts

June 14 2010 12:20 GMT

I believe that TL should keep the post count as is. It seems like the fastest way to see if a user is a 1 poster or greater than a certain number.

Husky

United States3362 Posts

June 14 2010 12:20 GMT

Post count is a must!

arew

Lithuania1848 Posts

June 14 2010 12:24 GMT

Keep postcount as it is!

Jon The Baptist

Ireland23 Posts

June 14 2010 12:31 GMT

It's clearly not a must!

not unless you make a video with puppys!

snpnx

Germany435 Posts

June 14 2010 12:31 GMT

Let it stay as it is, if someone spams for more posts, ban him,
otherwise it's still a good thing to put a bit more weight into answers from users with ridiculous high post counts. As the commandments say, you should respect your elders.

defuzas

248 Posts

June 14 2010 12:32 GMT

keep it as it is! theres no need to fix a non broken thing

Iplaythings

Denmark7752 Posts

June 14 2010 12:35 GMT

Keep it, else there won't be as many epic 1000th posts etc

Apolo

Portugal1259 Posts

June 14 2010 12:37 GMT

You could add another poll asking how many posts the person voting has, to see if it's somewhat biased

Here or in forums where i have higher post count, I find it a totaly useless statistic to be shown either way.

Eatme

Switzerland3918 Posts

June 14 2010 12:39 GMT

#10

Postcount in profile and joindate where the postcount is. If not keep it as it is now.

---Disco---

United Kingdom8 Posts

June 14 2010 12:41 GMT

#11

People discriminate based on post count

meegrean

Thailand6162 Posts

June 14 2010 12:44 GMT

#12

Posts + Average post per week as well would probably better insight about user.

Kyo Yuy

United States815 Posts

June 14 2010 12:46 GMT

#13

On June 14 2010 21:31 snpnx wrote:
Let it stay as it is, if someone spams for more posts, ban him,
otherwise it's still a good thing to put a bit more weight into answers from users with ridiculous high post counts. As the commandments say, you should respect your elders.

I know quite a few users who joined TL around the same time as me (late 08/early 09) who have five times my post count or greater.

A low post count does not imply a new member. I just don't post that much because I don't have that much that I want to say.

ZenDeX

Philippines2872 Posts

June 14 2010 12:46 GMT

#14

I don't care. What's next? Removing user icons?

Kanil

United States1702 Posts

June 14 2010 13:03 GMT

#15

There seems to be a lot of post count e-penis measuring going on at the forums.

Unfortunately, my post count is rather... short. But some day, it might be large and I could lord myself over the small dicked newbies!

So we should keep it as is.

Mykill

Canada3251 Posts

June 14 2010 13:07 GMT

#16

post count and join date would be useful

NuKedUFirst

Canada3138 Posts

June 14 2010 13:17 GMT

#17

Post count and date joined, Posts:500 Date: 08/07/07 or something like that would be excellent ^_^

KasPra

Estonia828 Posts

June 14 2010 13:22 GMT

#18

If you take the post count down people will post less and there will be a lot less useless posts imo, ive seen that action taken in a lot of forums and it usually works quite well. I voted i dont care though cause i never visit the sc2 forums.

Titusmaster6

United States5010 Posts

June 14 2010 13:22 GMT

#19

I agree that post count and join date would be an improvement on what we have now.

wishbones

Canada2600 Posts

June 14 2010 13:24 GMT

#20

Post counts are awesome I always check a users post count before posting some of my responses to their posts. Lol, and then when I go and click user profile If they joined before me, with a post count of 2 I definitely change my post. Simply put, the longer a member has been here, the more leisure they have over me.