|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 11 2011 03:20 Incognito wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2011 02:50 Radfield wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Rules] +*note: There is a new rule in place. In the event that your first AND second numbers clash with another player you both go straight to the bottom of the order. So if 3 players picked [4][1], [4][1] and [4][7] the 2 players with [4][1] are bumped below the player that picked [4][7] along with the original bump. All in All the most unique number combination gets priority.
Draft Order Question: When two players pick the exact two numbers, [4][1] and [4][1], would they drop ALL the way to the bottom of the draft, or just below the player who picked [4][7]? If 6 numbers were chosen: A [4][1] B [4][1] C [4][7] D [8][1] E [8][2] F [10][1] Would the order be: F [10][1] C [4][7] D [8][1] E [8][2] A [4][1] B [4][1] Or would it be: F [10][1] C [4][7] A [4][1] B [4][1] D [8][1] E [8][2] My assumption is the former, but I just figured I'd check. Actually it would be: F [10][1] D [8][1] E [8][2] C [4][7] A [4][1] B [4][1] That's not how it was in the past....it should be:
F [10][1] C [4][7] A [4][1] B [4][1] D [8][1] E [8][2]
|
|
On May 11 2011 05:44 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2011 03:20 Incognito wrote:On May 11 2011 02:50 Radfield wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Rules] +*note: There is a new rule in place. In the event that your first AND second numbers clash with another player you both go straight to the bottom of the order. So if 3 players picked [4][1], [4][1] and [4][7] the 2 players with [4][1] are bumped below the player that picked [4][7] along with the original bump. All in All the most unique number combination gets priority.
Draft Order Question: When two players pick the exact two numbers, [4][1] and [4][1], would they drop ALL the way to the bottom of the draft, or just below the player who picked [4][7]? If 6 numbers were chosen: A [4][1] B [4][1] C [4][7] D [8][1] E [8][2] F [10][1] Would the order be: F [10][1] C [4][7] D [8][1] E [8][2] A [4][1] B [4][1] Or would it be: F [10][1] C [4][7] A [4][1] B [4][1] D [8][1] E [8][2] My assumption is the former, but I just figured I'd check. Actually it would be: F [10][1] D [8][1] E [8][2] C [4][7] A [4][1] B [4][1] That's not how it was in the past....it should be: F [10][1] C [4][7] A [4][1] B [4][1] D [8][1] E [8][2] No, Incognito's way is how it was done in PYP3.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
That's not how it was done in PYP1.
|
According to the OP its the way it was done in PYP3.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
|
If announced in the thread that I was going to choose [1][1], would everyone else not choose that since it would mean that we would both get pulled down?
This is, of course, hypothetical.
|
On May 11 2011 06:25 tnkted wrote:If announced in the thread that I was going to choose [1][1], would everyone else not choose that since it would mean that we would both get pulled down? This is, of course, hypothetical. Read the earlier games. People did this. They got pulled down.
On May 10 2011 21:33 Caller wrote: some asshole told me to sign up so here i am No trying to start a new streak! I will find a way to break it before a year ends if you do!
|
+ Show Spoiler +On May 11 2011 04:15 Ver wrote:A couple of things to clarify. Coag and BC are not playing. Signups are closed for the most part. Several players (not going to say who, but just to be clear given the banlist discussions Qatol was not among them) only joined the game on the condition that it didn't have people who have a history of creating a bad environment in the thread due to bm etc. At the time this wasn't a big deal: Coag was banned still and the other offending parties either couldn't join, are permabanned, or weren't around. I simply avoided inviting certain people who I would have otherwise wanted to and that was that. Now that coag got unbanned before signups were closed and joined, a pretty awkward situation is created. If I include him, then several players don't play. If I ban him, he (rightfully) feels singled out. The same is the case with Bloodycobbler. Due to the clash they had that resulted in Qatol temporarily leaving the forum to get away, Qatol does not want to play with BC so it's an 'if he joins i don't play' situation. BC was banned at the time that Qatol joined (well before his signup in thread) so it was a clear 'sure no problem' kinda deal. Now that there's an initiative in the ban thread to get BC unbanned for this game, I have to put my foot down and say no, sorry. It sucks to be put in a situation where I have to essentially ban one friend no matter what but someone has to lose here it seems . This has nothing to do with the ban list, hosts always have the prerogative to ban who they choose (i,e Ace banning Bill Murray). In this case it's nothing I have personally against anyone but it's a situation where if party A joins party B/C/D/E etc quit. I assured the latter players and Qatol that their condition would be met (when circumstances were different and it didn't seem a big deal) so it would be unfair to go back on it now that circumstances have changed. I'm also going to close signups unless previously invited because Ace only was going to join the game if it was smaller and 24/25, depending on if FW plays or not, is already plenty. I recognize it sucks for you guys to be excluded like this so for my next game (probably going to be hosted late summer) you both have a guaranteed slot if you want in then. That's all I can offer. Please don't start a huge drama out of this, my decision isn't changing. Game starts Friday night. No shit? That is so fucking 8th grade. /out. I don't want to ruin anybodies gaming experience.
|
On May 11 2011 01:03 chaoser wrote: I remember you scamp! As soon as you signed up I was like "lul, scamp is playing" on IRC. Remember when you blew shit up in Plexa's summer mafia?
I probably do, but I'd have to go back and check exactly which game that was. For being a mostly passive player I've had my share of interesting moments.
Also it seems I've missed a lot of drama. Mafia has never been an easy game to play.
|
On May 11 2011 06:28 Qatol wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2011 06:25 tnkted wrote:If announced in the thread that I was going to choose [1][1], would everyone else not choose that since it would mean that we would both get pulled down? This is, of course, hypothetical. Read the earlier games. People did this. They got pulled down. Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 21:33 Caller wrote: some asshole told me to sign up so here i am No trying to start a new streak! I will find a way to break it before a year ends if you do! curses, foiled again
|
Pretty nice roster, this should be good. Gl hf everyone!
|
I would like to /in if there's still room, I'm assuming there is since Jackal just outed.
|
This is going to be insane, so to speak.
|
On May 11 2011 15:10 KillerSOS wrote: This is going to be insane, so to speak. nah I feel like it'll be pretty tame don't worry about it
|
/in for Sub if sign-ups closed....let me know.
|
On May 11 2011 17:33 VisceraEyes wrote: /in for Sub if sign-ups closed....let me know.
all right, who's the mars volta fan with a smurf?
|
Nope...Just a Mars Volta fan...a very ambitious one.
|
/in If there is a spot, the OP still says "probably full".
|
Couple questions:
Village Idiot
Congratulations, you are Bill Murray! In honor of this venerable veteran of our community, your goal is to do what bill does best, get lynched. If you get lynched, you win. Otherwise, you lose. You are a third party but show up as vanilla town to rolechecks. The game will not end if you get lynched, but you will get your own picture and postgame award.
1. If everyone in this game is getting a role, shouldn't bm NOT appear as vanilla townie? That would be more suspicious than apppearing as mafia, unless the thief has already outed himself.
2. Can the inventor give an invention to the puppeteer's smurf? Would the puppeteer use that invention, or would the smurf?
3. How does role reverser work? Do kills, for example, target the killer rather then the intended victem?
4. How accurate does the assassin's rolename have to be when he/she is guessing? If I were to type Ace Cop, would dirty cop work?
5. America's Nuke power needs to be posted in the thread, and just kills somebody, correct? or does it also kill everyone who voted for that person?
6. NRA members only kill the FIRST person to visit them and not later visiters, yes? What if the person that visits them is mafia trying to kill them? Would the mafia die, or would both players die? What happens if mafia, the night they kill, happen to be protected by a medic? Would the mafia still die, and if not, would the NRA member lose his kill?
7. How does Pardoner work in this game? Is it GM style, where it ends the lynch for the day, or is it a different style?
8. If the dirty cop is blocked by the bone breaker, what happens? Can the dirty cop still sell his services, or does nothing happen?
9. What happens if somebody blocks the puppeteer? Does the puppeteer immediately lose his ability to control his smurf?
10. What happens if the journalist takes control of the puppeteer's smurf? Does that smurf have to post something? Can the puppeteer then reveal that the smurf was taken control of by the journalist, since technically the smurf would be the only person in that relationship who couldn't reveal?
|
|
|
|