WL vs PL format - Page 2
Blogs > Spazer |
mierin
United States4942 Posts
| ||
Yodo
Russian Federation327 Posts
Honestly I love WL. But maybe that's because I'm a KT fanboy. Actually in WL, Flash is rarely sent out, so Flash fans should be disappointed. Bisu was even able to snatch away 1-st place with most wins due to this format. I think in the next game vs ACE you wouldn't see Flash either. I like WL coz it give more play-time to rookies. | ||
xxpack09
United States2160 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:55 Yodo wrote: Actually in WL, Flash is rarely sent out, so Flash fans should be disappointed. Bisu was even able to snatch away 1-st place with most wins due to this format. I think in the next game vs ACE you wouldn't see Flash either. I like WL coz it give more play-time to rookies. How does WL give more play time to rookies? In WL, teams send 4 players. In PL, they send 6 or even 7 if they choose to do so | ||
Chef
10810 Posts
I like the variety of switching between formats with WL and PL though. Keeps things fresh. | ||
moopie
12605 Posts
On February 26 2011 08:43 xxpack09 wrote: How does WL give more play time to rookies? In WL, teams send 4 players. In PL, they send 6 or even 7 if they choose to do so Yes but in WL, if a team has a strong ace they can rely on to clean up, the risk of losing the set is much lower than in proleague, where aces can only get you 1 + ace match (and you still NEED the other players on the team to score some wins to get to the ace match). As such, most teams can spare 1-2 slots for more dubious players (depending on the team and their opposing team of course). | ||
| ||