|
On July 22 2010 11:39 Subversion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:35 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On July 22 2010 11:31 Subversion wrote:On July 22 2010 11:23 youngminii wrote:On July 22 2010 11:19 ~OpZ~ wrote: *Addition* Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that? He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too. I do think Tree.Hugger is quite town aligned. Early I learnt that Tree.Hugger had PM'd people saying 'if we lynch subversion and he flips red, then we have youngminii'. I pointed out that if Tree.Hugger was scum and subversion flipped green, then I'd be 'safe'. There's no logical reason why Tree.Hugger would tie me to subversion if subversion is town and Tree.Hugger is scum. Why would you think this makes him town aligned? All he is doing is putting forth a reason to vote me off. Me being town, this would be a pretty scum thing to do? No Errr... elaborate? Townies don't know you are town so putting reasons to vote for you is not a scum thing to do.
|
Well...if BC is mafia...his vote on Amber is quite interesting....who was it on previously guys?
|
On July 22 2010 11:39 chaoser wrote: I don't like how this situation is playing out...the votes are so close, Mafia should be able to save their own if they wanted to if one of their own was in trouble. But they're not. What does this mean...
we're all trying to lynch townies and they're laughing at us, or they think if one of their own dies it'll draw enough attention off of them that it's worth it?
|
On July 22 2010 11:41 ~OpZ~ wrote: Well...if BC is mafia...his vote on Amber is quite interesting....who was it on previously guys? What is the case on BC now? I like how we have under 80 minutes left, all the votes are on DTA/Chaoser/Subversion and everyone in the thread is talking about opz and tree hugger and bc and amberlight.
|
Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal.
|
I hate this game. It made me miss day9's daily.
|
caveat emptor: if this is wrong, it's on you all to correct me, or i will proceed with my tally
Vote Count:
*8] DarthThienAn (d3_crescentia, Pyrrhuloxia, XeliN, zeks, Subversion, LaXerCannon, rastaban, ~OpZ~) 7] chaoser (youngminii, Roffles, SouthRawrEa, misder, citi.zen, BrownBear, chaoser) 7] Subversion (tree.hugger, bumatlarge, jayme, Amber[LighT], chaoser, DarthThienAn, iNfuNdiBuLuM) 1] Brownbear (tricode) 2] Amber[LighT] (BloodyC0bbler, Divinek) Abstain: (Protactinium, lakrismamma, Pandain)
not voting:
everyone voted!
double lynch:
(1/15) iNfuNdiBuLuM
*=first
|
On July 22 2010 11:47 youngminii wrote: I hate this game. It made me miss day9's daily.
whatsa matter?
|
On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Now what are these posts I left out? He had serious posts answering Foolishness, which I mentioned. He also had a serious post discussing someone's plan at some point. The vast majority of posts were clearly not serious. He had no serious posts until Foolishness and I called him out Day 1. There's no debating that he has become way more serious and logical since I've held his feet to the fire Day 2.
And I don't see how you can be sure that Subversion is townie when he is clearly blue or red at this point.
|
When I die, lynch Pyrr plz.
Vote double lynch
|
On July 22 2010 11:49 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Now what are these posts I left out? He had serious posts answering Foolishness, which I mentioned. He also had a serious post discussing someone's plan at some point. The vast majority of posts were clearly not serious. He had no serious posts until Foolishness and I called him out Day 1. There's no debating that he has become way more serious and logical since I've held his feet to the fire Day 2. And I don't see how you can be sure that Subversion is townie when he is clearly blue or red at this point.
yes, i thin those Foolishness posts and "plan posts" were the ones I'm thinking of.
joking around isn't a sign of scum in my experience. I've seen players do it no matter what side they're on.
By "Townie" i meant town-side, i.e. blue or green. sorry, i should have been clearer there.
|
On July 22 2010 11:41 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:39 Subversion wrote:On July 22 2010 11:35 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On July 22 2010 11:31 Subversion wrote:On July 22 2010 11:23 youngminii wrote:On July 22 2010 11:19 ~OpZ~ wrote: *Addition* Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that? He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too. I do think Tree.Hugger is quite town aligned. Early I learnt that Tree.Hugger had PM'd people saying 'if we lynch subversion and he flips red, then we have youngminii'. I pointed out that if Tree.Hugger was scum and subversion flipped green, then I'd be 'safe'. There's no logical reason why Tree.Hugger would tie me to subversion if subversion is town and Tree.Hugger is scum. Why would you think this makes him town aligned? All he is doing is putting forth a reason to vote me off. Me being town, this would be a pretty scum thing to do? No Errr... elaborate? Townies don't know you are town so putting reasons to vote for you is not a scum thing to do.
But mafia know I am town, so putting reasons to vote for me, assuming I am town, IS a scum thing to do.
|
On July 22 2010 11:50 DarthThienAn wrote: When I die, lynch Pyrr plz.
Vote double lynch
pff die no way brah
##unvote ##vote chaoser
oh shit im scum saving my scum buddy
the power is with you my son
|
On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Most suspicious post in a long time.
|
On July 22 2010 11:55 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Most suspicious post in a long time.
why is it suspicious?
you're not going to convince anyone of anything without some reasons.
or are you just bitter about day 1?
|
On July 22 2010 11:55 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Most suspicious post in a long time. lol yeah ignore chaoser much?
|
On July 22 2010 11:55 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Most suspicious post in a long time.
If you're not convinced by Pyrr's thing on DTA, and you think I'm townie - why not vote for chaoser? There are 3 choices here, not two.
|
On July 22 2010 11:56 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 11:55 youngminii wrote:On July 22 2010 11:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Ugh
i've already outlined my reasons for chaoser being innocent.
at first i was pretty convinced by Pyrr's essay, but youngminii and a couple other players did point out some flaws. upon reexamination it also seems that Pyrr was very selective in which posts of DTA he presented, picking only the worst posts and omitting DTA's more logical and serious posts.
I'm pretty sure Subversion is townie as i've been saying for the past 20 pages or something. but at this point it looks like i have to choose the lesser of two evils.
#vote subversion
Sorry, man. nothing personal. Most suspicious post in a long time. lol yeah ignore chaoser much?
chaoser has been a more positive contributor to the town than subversion has.
|
After careful consideration, I have to
##Vote DarthThienAn.
Your playstyle is too hard to read, and though you're posting in a more normal fashion at this point I believe you have polarized the town the most. While Subversion drew a lot of flak for the missed comment, in the end most of the impetuous people who jumped on that withdrew, but your case has thoroughly divided the town. At this point, I don't even know if any of you three are Mafia, and I am loathe to undertake a last-hour bandwagon. Between the madness you have brought us enough posts to look at, so in the case that you die we will be able to go back and find how this all started.
|
On July 22 2010 11:58 Protactinium wrote: After careful consideration, I have to
##Vote DarthThienAn.
Your playstyle is too hard to read, and though you're posting in a more normal fashion at this point I believe you have polarized the town the most. While Subversion drew a lot of flak for the missed comment, in the end most of the impetuous people who jumped on that withdrew, but your case has thoroughly divided the town. At this point, I don't even know if any of you three are Mafia, and I am loathe to undertake a last-hour bandwagon. Between the madness you have brought us enough posts to look at, so in the case that you die we will be able to go back and find how this all started.
like I said, when I die and flip town, lynch Pyrr
|
|
|
|