Well we have three categories.

1) Clues and active, but not defending themselves. Hobbes from day 1 killer 1 would fit into this category. He's posted some, but never tried to defend himself in any real way. I would say the clues aren't that strong on him though. I'm not sure I think about his behavior. He may be playing it safe and to not incriminate himself or just knows there is nothing he can really say. He hasn't really contributed much or defended himself which is a bit odd.

2) Clues and defended self. Flamewheel falls into this category. He hasn't really been that active until he was brought up as a possible suspect. I think that is a little bit suspicious myself. There is still the possibility that he is just trying to honestly defense himself.

3) Clues and inactive. Treadmasta(spelling?) and kane fall into this category. Hard to gauge these. They could be lurking mafia or green/blues. Or just simply not participating.

meeple

Canada10211 Posts

January 24 2010 04:47 GMT

#1104

keit could also possibly fit into the clues and inactive category. Cookie monster could be a link to the first killer on Day 1 and he hasn't posted at all, other than to vote

789

United States959 Posts

January 24 2010 04:50 GMT

#1105

Ah yes, I had a feeling I was forgetting someone.

meeple

Canada10211 Posts

January 24 2010 04:52 GMT

#1106

So what do you think... safest to go with clues and not active or clues and active?

789

United States959 Posts

January 24 2010 04:58 GMT

#1107

I'm not quite sure yet. Flamewheel's olympic link is pretty decent and his behavior is at least a little suspicious. I think him and Kane have the strongest clue links. The problem with the Kane clue ... maybe I went fishing and found something completely unrelated that the writer didn't know about by luck. Then again I can't think of anything that remotely fits that. They both hurt equally bad if they flip blue, but I think flamewheel will hurt more if he flips green. He's at least proven that he does participate by defending himself. I am still leaning towards kane, but I feel less confident about the decision as time goes by.

StimiLant

United States534 Posts

January 24 2010 05:05 GMT

#1108

kanedeth, it seems to me based on day twos clues you are a top suspect, rebuddle in ur defence before i vote for ur death? plz give strong arguments

meeple

Canada10211 Posts

January 24 2010 05:08 GMT

#1109

On January 24 2010 14:05 StimiLant wrote:
kanedeth, it seems to me based on day twos clues you are a top suspect, rebuddle in ur defence before i vote for ur death? plz give strong arguments

I'd like to hear a couple people defend yourself actually,

kane
keit
tredmasta

If you have anything to say, say it now

789

United States959 Posts

January 24 2010 05:21 GMT

#1110

Actually now that I think about it, Hobbes did make one post in his defense. I'm too lazy to go find it, but I remember his point being hobbes isn't barbaric like killer 1 day 1; he's laid back. That's a decent point, but we can't assume that writer knows that.

flamewheel

FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts

January 24 2010 05:23 GMT

#1111

On January 24 2010 13:42 789 wrote:
Well we have three categories.

1) Clues and active, but not defending themselves. Hobbes from day 1 killer 1 would fit into this category. He's posted some, but never tried to defend himself in any real way. I would say the clues aren't that strong on him though. I'm not sure I think about his behavior. He may be playing it safe and to not incriminate himself or just knows there is nothing he can really say. He hasn't really contributed much or defended himself which is a bit odd.

2) Clues and defended self. Flamewheel falls into this category. He hasn't really been that active until he was brought up as a possible suspect. I think that is a little bit suspicious myself. There is still the possibility that he is just trying to honestly defense himself.

3) Clues and inactive. Treadmasta(spelling?) and kane fall into this category. Hard to gauge these. They could be lurking mafia or green/blues. Or just simply not participating.

I admit my behavior can be construed as suspicious, seeing as how I have become suddenly "active" after becoming accused. However, would you not defend? Furthermore, I have a pretty busy school schedule--which in itself doesn't say anything.

Logically speaking though, 789, is it more effective to lynch somebody who does not ever defend themselves? Hobbes has been accused multiple times and has gotten away without defending himself due to extenuating circumstances: t_co causing drama, night 1 killings, etc.

On January 24 2010 13:58 789 wrote:
I'm not quite sure yet. Flamewheel's olympic link is pretty decent and his behavior is at least a little suspicious. I think him and Kane have the strongest clue links. The problem with the Kane clue ... maybe I went fishing and found something completely unrelated that the writer didn't know about by luck. Then again I can't think of anything that remotely fits that. They both hurt equally bad if they flip blue, but I think flamewheel will hurt more if he flips green. He's at least proven that he does participate by defending himself. I am still leaning towards kane, but I feel less confident about the decision as time goes by.

The fact that I have been able to analytically and logically defend myself should say something more about my worth as a player, I feel.

510Sushi

Azerbaijan331 Posts

January 24 2010 05:28 GMT

#1112

Hobbes is still a prime suspect, due to the clues from days one and two (in specific the part in day two about the "wild animal" )

789

United States959 Posts

January 24 2010 05:29 GMT

#1113

While I said your behavior might be a little suspicious, I still have kane #1 on my list for what it's worth. Also I agee with your second point, which is why I said it would hurt more if you flipped green.

StimiLant

United States534 Posts

January 24 2010 05:29 GMT

#1114

hobbes did defend himself, or so i thought, trying to see where but nonetheless he is one of the suspects just need a strong case for him

789

United States959 Posts

January 24 2010 05:37 GMT

#1115

Yeah I said I thought I remembered a small defense post from him in another of my posts. I'm too lazy to go searching for it as I don't have any idea what page it is on.

789

United States959 Posts

January 24 2010 05:40 GMT

#1116

On January 21 2010 01:55 [NyC]HoBbes wrote:
Wow, I log back on and suddenly I'm top suspect... fun. Only thing I'll say in my defense is that out of Calvin and Hobbes in the cartoon, Hobbes comes off at least 90% of the time as the exact opposite of Calvin's Loud/barbaric. Even though he's the tiger, he's usually the laid-back, philosophical one.

Found it on page 11. Decided to put a little bit of effort into it, and I picked a lucky place to start at page 10. I scanned the next 5 pages or so and that is all he really had to say about it.

flamewheel

FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts

January 24 2010 05:42 GMT

#1117

On January 24 2010 14:28 ghote wrote:
Hobbes is still a prime suspect, due to the clues from days one and two (in specific the part in day two about the "wild animal" )

Then am I still your top suspect, ghote? Have you happened to find anymore information on me yet?

flamewheel

FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts

January 24 2010 05:44 GMT

#1118

On January 24 2010 14:29 789 wrote:
While I said your behavior might be a little suspicious, I still have kane #1 on my list for what it's worth. Also I agee with your second point, which is why I said it would hurt more if you flipped green.

And if you're accused, 789, by the same token it will seem suspicious if your posting activity rises in order to save your own life. But I thank you for your logical follow through--I am still strongly protesting my lynching by the rest of the bandwagoners out there.