On August 12 2009 17:09 Railz wrote:
Really now, if every player stayed with the original team they were on, you'd have about 5 teams now. Why should boxer be loyal to a team when it dark reality, teams back then meant almost nothing other then just practice partners. The PL wasn't really a set in stone thing. Needless to say Boxer didn't 'poach' anyone, they left on their own accord (so you should attack intotherainbow's loyalty too then?) Questioning boxer's loyalty when he has stayed with the team HE made for well past retirement years for pro-gamers is not only illogically, it is borderline insulting.
Really now, if every player stayed with the original team they were on, you'd have about 5 teams now. Why should boxer be loyal to a team when it dark reality, teams back then meant almost nothing other then just practice partners. The PL wasn't really a set in stone thing. Needless to say Boxer didn't 'poach' anyone, they left on their own accord (so you should attack intotherainbow's loyalty too then?) Questioning boxer's loyalty when he has stayed with the team HE made for well past retirement years for pro-gamers is not only illogically, it is borderline insulting.
the point isn't boxer, it's the team's journey.
What started out as a team growing talent and taking it to the arena, they turned into a team that purchased lost momentum from loaded bank accounts.
I don't think this is particularly bad or anything, but the posters above hit the nail on the head when they say it robs the team of a certain elegance.