[Map] Oryeonggo - Page 5

JMave

Singapore1802 Posts

August 07 2009 11:40 GMT

#81

In my opinion, a map that has only one route to reach a destination, particularly from the main to the other, is extremely terran favoured. PvT looks impossibly hard on this map if terran can push well in this map.

GTR

51279 Posts

August 07 2009 11:48 GMT

#82

very peaksy feel

saritenite

Singapore1680 Posts

August 07 2009 15:46 GMT

#83

With regards to TvZ

The Terran appears to have to go mech because of the gas easily available. With MnM it is really tough to play on this map that has so many line of sight doodads (cliffs as well).

The harass spots I highlighted are really good for drops, even a slow lurker drop. The map will be very expansion/macro heavy still because of the easy gas for all races.

The 4th expo should arguably be in one of the corners, instead of the wide open area to the left and right sides of the map (in blue). After kona changed the map the flanking opportunities for the opponent means the Terran player will not be able to pick up either east or west expo (depending on his starting location)

Which brings me to TvP or TvT

Rallying to that point will reinforce the positions very well. The main ramp further away from your base will be where the opponent puts pressure, if you have taken the expo. However, when the game progresses further, you will find in PvT or TvT, the opponent will want to drop your base (you to him as well) or recall (utterly gay too) and break the ramp closer to your main, so as to cut off your reinforcement route.

I'd like to see two experienced T players go against each other on this map. I haven't analysed PvZ on this map just yet because I know crud about that matchup (other than it's nearly as fun as TvZ)

konadora

Singapore66063 Posts

August 07 2009 16:43 GMT

#84

On August 07 2009 20:48 GTR wrote:
very peaksy feel

because of all the routes now?

KwarK

United States41638 Posts

August 07 2009 17:07 GMT

#85

3 gas for the first 3 base is too much when they're this easily takable. Unless you Loki it up by putting only 1k gas in the back geyser I don't see this being too balanced.

konadora

Singapore66063 Posts

August 07 2009 17:11 GMT

#86

On August 08 2009 02:07 Kwark wrote:
3 gas for the first 3 base is too much when they're this easily takable. Unless you Loki it up by putting only 1k gas in the back geyser I don't see this being too balanced.

It's 2k gas though