[M][T] Haunted Mansion 3 - Page 29
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On September 10 2016 02:20 Holyflare wrote: apart from that time I called you scummy You also said that me not sheeping you made me scum and that me voting a Brit dude confirmed me as mafia, but this was trolling. | ||
Vivax
21691 Posts
I'd like to see an explaining for why he's town that doesn't include something like his activity which is his filter being made up by 50 % his name and site layout and 50 % actual post content while "trying to break the setup" (bitch please). | ||
Calix
3379 Posts
On September 10 2016 01:38 NeverUnlucky wrote: What is your take on the Vivax - Superbia showdown hen? Please tell me you aren't going to go read other games to meta-read someone/understand someone's behavior... duh I prefer to have the person I'm talking to answer my posts, not a spokesperson. I don't consider it a 'showdown' actually, just two people being jumpy around each other. Vivax analysed some of Superbia's posts, Superbia responded and Vivax repeated the points when stating his scum-read on Superbia. Also Superbia accused Vivax of OMGUS which seemed out of nowhere, but I don't remember Superbia's previous scum-read on Vivax. Granted, I only skim-read it so this opinion is shit, but nothing Vivax pointed out is that scummy (seemed more theoretical, like when he was saying "Superbia could be trying to make Calix scum-read NU", so stuff like that is too...abstract (for lack of a better word) to appeal to me) I didn't see anything that only scum would do from either of them. I might reread that later and revise my 'thoughts' but don't hold your breath. lmao. This game is active/ spammy enough for me. Hell no am I going to look at this thread and decide "ah yes I shall spend time reading another game". I haven't properly looked through any 'filters' yet if I am honest. I'd rather try and motivate myself to do that before EOD and see if I can find something. That whole 'finding shit that only scum would say' is why I'm not full-on scum-reading Vivax, by the way, because while scum COULD play like him, I don't recall him doing anything that only scum would do. Don't know if that makes much sense but that's where my thoughts are atm with him. | ||
Vivax
21691 Posts
Besides he can do that with a lot of people, even if he just hinted at thinking they might be mafia. He claims I posted for the sake of posting at the beginning of the game yet didn't mention examples or pushed me for it. Good at spamming the thread with irrelevant content, bad at actually doing stuff, in a scummy way. Attacks at him get deflected with jokes/omgus/asking the thread if he should bother. | ||
Superbia
Netherlands8889 Posts
| ||
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
| ||
fuba
United States663 Posts
Actually, mentioning that he's lynchbait is counterproductive to getting TW lynched, so why even mention it? Gonna need to think about this more after work - need my computer in front of me XD | ||
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
| ||
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On September 10 2016 02:32 Calix wrote:I prefer to have the person I'm talking to answer my posts, not a spokesperson. A spokesperson, eh? I wasn't speaking on Vivax's behalf, the comments I made were my own. Cut off being cold n' oblivious to me. With all the inferences you've made so far, you're no better than the pussy-footing Cryptonic, SJ, and DW. Be direct or GTFO. I'd rather try and motivate myself to do that before EOD and see if I can find something. That whole 'finding shit that only scum would say' is why I'm not full-on scum-reading Vivax, by the way, because while scum COULD play like him, I don't recall him doing anything that only scum would do. Don't know if that makes much sense but that's where my thoughts are atm with him. He is my strongest town-read, so, yes, you will need to filter his posts and make a case on him for me to have a paradigm shift. | ||
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
You get lynched, you can cop check for that night. Once per game only one of those who get lynched can vigi shot instead of a check. You get nk'd, you can protect someone following night. Anyway don't want to stir up mechanics discussion again but might aswell put my stance on it. I mean write whatever you want on your message, it can get manipulated so doesn't really matter what you put in it. However dead can decide on their collective vote accordingly to the message, if it is unchanged then their vote will be manipulated that they know for sure. If it is changed then you know your vote is safe. | ||
Calix
3379 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:10 NeverUnlucky wrote: A spokesperson, eh? I wasn't speaking on Vivax's behalf, the comments I made were my own. Cut off being cold n' oblivious to me. With all the inferences you've made so far, you're no better than the pussy-footing Cryptonic, SJ, and DW. Be direct or GTFO. He is my strongest town-read, so, yes, you will need to filter his posts and make a case on him for me to have a paradigm shift. No. "you're no better than the pussy-footing Cryptonic, SJ, and DW" - I laugh at this. What makes you town-read him so strongly? If you don't want to explain yourself then just ignore this post and I'll take the hint. | ||
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On September 10 2016 02:53 fuba wrote: I'd thought that "lynchbait" is when a player is prone to attracting votes as town, which would indicate a TW town read from NU, given that he doesn't have any knowledge of TW's meta. And I was well aware that this is contrary to his general thoughts on TW at that point in the game. That's why I wouldn't really revisit it unless TW flips town (if/when that happens). I.E. if TW flips town, this could have been a slip. Actually, mentioning that he's lynchbait is counterproductive to getting TW lynched, so why even mention it? Gonna need to think about this more after work - need my computer in front of me XD Odd that you change your stance on this point after Vivax and I called you out for it. Calling him bad =/= town-reading him. What does my knowledge of TW's meta have to do with any of this? "That's why I wouldn't really revisit it unless TW flips town (if/when that happens). I.E. if TW flips town, this could have been a slip." So you know he is going to flip town with the addition of the 'when'. I do not see why else you found the need to add this word after 'if' which is a conditional, meaning you know he's town. Scumslip. You're also trying to tie up TW's flip to me which is scummy as fuck. IE - X flipped town and was pushed by Y, therefore Y is scum. You are already setting up a mislynch on me knowing that TW will flip town. What makes you say that I wanted him lynched? Scum-read =/= desire to lynch Fuba is scum. | ||
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:15 Skynx wrote: 3 ppl spend 3 pages discussing simplest mechanics literally. You get lynched, you can cop check for that night. Once per game only one of those who get lynched can vigi shot instead of a check. You get nk'd, you can protect someone following night. Anyway don't want to stir up mechanics discussion again but might aswell put my stance on it. I mean write whatever you want on your message, it can get manipulated so doesn't really matter what you put in it. However dead can decide on their collective vote accordingly to the message, if it is unchanged then their vote will be manipulated that they know for sure. If it is changed then you know your vote is safe. All of this is obvious and has already been said. Looks like a filler/fluff post. | ||
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:18 Calix wrote:No. I cannot deal with your hypocrisy and smartass-ery. If you cannot be honest with me, I've nothing to do with you. "you're no better than the pussy-footing Cryptonic, SJ, and DW" - I laugh at this. x What makes you town-read him so strongly? If you don't want to explain yourself then just ignore this post and I'll take the hint. Basically all of the reasons you can think I would give to defend a tr and would discredit me for. | ||
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:25 NeverUnlucky wrote: All of this is obvious and has already been said. Looks like a filler/fluff post. I'm so close to ignoring you forever. Shall i just lend you my password and let you play from my account? Anything I write seems to be inadequate for your whatever righteousness-o-meter. I let you know how I'm playing, I read through and comment on what I like and you keep saying "that's been mentioned", "fluff/filler post" whatever. As i said those 3 literally spent 3 pages filling their filter with stuff about mechanics and you call this one post useless. | ||
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On September 10 2016 03:39 Skynx wrote: I'm so close to ignoring you forever. Shall i just lend you my password and let you play from my account? Anything I write seems to be inadequate for your whatever righteousness-o-meter. I let you know how I'm playing, I read through and comment on what I like and you keep saying "that's been mentioned", "fluff/filler post" whatever. As i said those 3 literally spent 3 pages filling their filter with stuff about mechanics and you call this one post useless. See, this was a good point. | ||
| ||