EPTIt looks bad and is bad
Newbie Student Mafia XI - Page 67
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
It looks bad and is bad | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:07 ruXxar wrote: Seems like we hit the right nerve. #Productive. ^ This is an even worse post. You're trying to make it seem like your post was bait when it wasn't even intended that way. Keep them terrible posts coming ruXxar, and while you're on that, make more associative cases and jump on more wagons. Don't forget that you had the same behavior with Sulfurus, so we might have to look into that bb.  | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5668 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:09 MoosyDoosy wrote: ^ This is an even worse post. You're trying to make it seem like your post was bait when it wasn't even intended that way. Keep them terrible posts coming ruXxar, and while you're on that, make more associative cases and jump on more wagons. Don't forget that you had the same behavior with Sulfurus, so we might have to look into that bb. You activated my trap card baby. <3 | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On June 13 2015 02:08 scott31337 wrote: So, geript is good as scum, but is playing worse than his mafia capabilities (and also therefore worse than his town capabilities, assuming he helps town at least a little more when he's town than when he's mafia). It's simply not alignment indicative, but scott31337 uses this as an excuse to not do anything about his geript read.Geript has four posts and very little content. I know he's good as mafia - but on the scum side of null for now. On June 13 2015 07:29 scott31337 wrote: In addition to the (at the time) easy target (MoosyDoosy), he said he could lynch everyone who could be a lynch target for the day, everyone that everyone else had been suspecting. He could be credited with leaving Rels out of the "could lynch" category, but then:Who I'm liking so far - Wave Trfel n00bKing Damdred Oats Probably wouldn't lynch today - Rels Kickstart Could Lynch - Batsnacks Geript MoosyDoosy Sulfurus RuXxar On June 14 2015 05:13 scott31337 wrote: So, nope.I can get aboard this and feeling better then a Sulf lynch - you pulled a lot of work Trfel. You the man! Reading through his filter, he only twice provided analysis on a player that is longer than one sentence. Combine that with how unoriginal he's been and how he's been willing to lynch everyone who might possibly be lynched, and he looks pretty scummy. I'm used to scott31337 being much more willing to go his own way and explain why. I feel like I kind of got pocketed when he pointed out the Bat Traps thing to me in url code earlier. It was a good point, but he never acted on it. I wish I had noticed sooner. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:12 MoosyDoosy wrote: Alright I'm out. If ruXxar's going to continue to be a shit there's no point in being here. You aren't even responding to,actual problems that are being shown | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:13 Damdred wrote: You aren't even responding to,actual problems that are being shown Then please point out these actual problems so that I can be productive than wasting time on ruXxar. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:19 Damdred wrote: If someone keeps promising activity when ever attention is given to them. Dissapears when thread looks everywhere and,never fulfills promise it a scummy Then can Kickstart respond to this rather than continuing to promise more activity and/or provide a solid argument? | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:22 Trfel wrote: Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337? I'll talk to you trfel. | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:22 Trfel wrote: Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337? I feel it's similar to behavior from Sulfurus and Kickstart. All three promise to post more and provide more content on some level but always give little content, end up on wagons, and disappear for some lengths of time unless directly referred to. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:24 Trfel wrote: Based on my post a few posts up, what do you think about scott31337? I cba to go looking through scott's filter for URL code could you maybe just paste all his secrets in the thread? I feel like that's an important part of what I'm trying to understand. | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Kickstart 1. Early posts don't attempt to provide reads + Show Spoiler + (first post in thread excluded as it obviously couldn't contain a read) On June 12 2015 08:14 Kickstart wrote: Liers means if you say you are going to do something but don't when it comes to forum mafia. Also good job breaking one of my rules, you answered a question directed at me! On June 12 2015 08:15 Kickstart wrote: But I might give you points for answering it correctly. Maybe. Probably not. On June 12 2015 08:16 Kickstart wrote: Also lol@ruxxar not finding the jokey first posts 'genuine enough'. You so silly. or scum. Ill let you decide which it is. On June 12 2015 08:17 Kickstart wrote: Oh also, dont forget that you have to 'actually' vote in the other thread. Generally you still say it here as well though so that people are sure to read it. On June 12 2015 08:19 Kickstart wrote: Day1 just at game start association cases are bad. Especially when I'm not scum. On June 12 2015 08:21 Kickstart wrote: And there are 3 mafia, 10 town. There are probably blue roles and possibly mafia roles but this we do not know, only the possibility that there is. On June 12 2015 08:29 Kickstart wrote: I'm joking with him it means nothing. His statement was silly and scummy, I said I would let him decide which one he wants us to classify it as. (hint: I think it is mildly scummy). On June 12 2015 10:08 Kickstart wrote: I've explained the no lying thing, read please. If you say you will do something do it - that is what is generally meant in forum mafia about lying. If you say " I will give my reads at such and such time", then you better do it, etc etc. On June 12 2015 10:09 Kickstart wrote: And town shouldn't really lie anyways. I don't know how ruxxar got in his mind that this game is about lying all over the place. Towns job is to not lie and be open and honest, only people that need to be thinking about lying this early are scum, save for some rare situations. On June 12 2015 10:17 Kickstart wrote: What case. The only case is that ruxxar misunderstood everything I said. Just an fyi, I will tunnel people to hell and back who willfully misrepresent what I say. Ask Oats. Whenever he decides to show up that is. On June 12 2015 10:18 Kickstart wrote: Look at how long it takes him to really start providing reads. For a very long time he's commenting but not going the next step of taking a stance on someone's alignment. So while he is posting, he actually isn't doing anything to move the game forward. It's best to make reads to at least get the game startedRuxxar is looking most scummy and sulfurus needlessly hoping on me as well is suspicious. Especially when he cites a non existent case as the reason. It's possible that he is simply holding some reads back, but simply scumreading ruXxar and Sulfurus suggests the opposite to me. He doesn't seem all that interested in scumreading, especially for his large volume of posts. 2. Terrible behavior since his return + Show Spoiler + Excuses, complaining, responding whenever someone scumreads him with "inactivity isn't alignment indicative". But no scumhunting, no questions, no content. He's willing to read the thread and say "this scumread of me is stupid" but not scumhunt. On June 16 2015 09:25 MoosyDoosy wrote: I have expectations for scott31337, and expectations for Kickstart. And neither of them are meeting these expectations.I feel it's similar to behavior from Sulfurus and Kickstart. All three promise to post more and provide more content on some level but always give little content, end up on wagons, and disappear for some lengths of time unless directly referred to. | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:28 batsnacks wrote: He just asked me what I thought about the fact that you hadn't used Bat Traps in this game. I responded saying that you generally only use Bat Traps as town, and that this was a good find.I cba to go looking through scott's filter for URL code could you maybe just paste all his secrets in the thread? I feel like that's an important part of what I'm trying to understand. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:30 Trfel wrote: He just asked me what I thought about the fact that you hadn't used Bat Traps in this game. I responded saying that you generally only use Bat Traps as town, and that this was a good find. Well he's right. Why bother to say this to you in code though? Was he defending me from you when I had votes or something? | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:33 batsnacks wrote: If he's town, presumably to make sure that if you were scum, you wouldn't see it and then use a Bat Trap?Well he's right. Why bother to say this to you in code though? Was he defending me from you when I had votes or something? Alternatively, he could have just done that to pocket me.... and it worked, darn it. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On June 16 2015 09:35 Trfel wrote: If he's town, presumably to make sure that if you were scum, you wouldn't see it and then use a Bat Trap? Alternatively, he could have just done that to pocket me.... and it worked, darn it. I don't understand why mafia scott is trying to pocket you of all people with an obscure yet highly accurate meta read on me. | ||
| ||
