On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred
Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.
And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?
While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.
I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because:
A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad
And
B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers
And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off
On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred
Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.
And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?
While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.
I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because:
A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad
And
B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers
And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off
##vote 27ninjabunnies
Enjoy your date
I'm not brushing it off, I' trying to look at it objectively. I think what he said makes sense. A. I know what he said. I said he was talking about policy lynching and lurkers. I never specifically said what he thought about it.
I don't think it's scummy. I think people are making something scummy out of nothing.
Thanks for the vote I knew it was to happen eventually, but I figured Ritoky would be the first to do it!
And I will enjoy my date Food and alcohol. what's better?
Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
On December 09 2014 08:42 Alakaslam wrote: Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
For shame if there is naebody to FITE
Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.
Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?
Better than food and alcohol is speed (not te drug)
Exceeding 200 MPH and messing with gravity, making dirt and rubber play nice and creating clouds from thin air off your wingtips via speed and phase change causing the ignorant to rail about conspiracies
On December 09 2014 08:42 Alakaslam wrote: Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
For shame if there is naebody to FITE
Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.
Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?
Why with everything going on do you not comment on it and instead only post about a joke and focus on fighting slam?
On December 09 2014 08:42 Alakaslam wrote: Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
For shame if there is naebody to FITE
Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.
Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?
Why with everything going on do you not comment on it and instead only post about a joke and focus on fighting slam?
Developing a read on slam seems like something nobody can reliably do so I may as well try
On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred
Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.
And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?
While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.
I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because:
A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad
And
B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers
And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off
##vote 27ninjabunnies
Enjoy your date
I'm not brushing it off, I' trying to look at it objectively. I think what he said makes sense. A. I know what he said. I said he was talking about policy lynching and lurkers. I never specifically said what he thought about it.
I don't think it's scummy. I think people are making something scummy out of nothing.
Thanks for the vote I knew it was to happen eventually, but I figured Ritoky would be the first to do it!
And I will enjoy my date Food and alcohol. what's better?
Well no. You said people talking about lynching lurkers are "off" and he was an "easy target to look scummy" which is already a contradiction in one post and now you are saying you know what he said and it doesn't look bad and people are making mountains out of mole hills which is a contradiction with your first post. There's a great deal of backtracking in what you are saying and I don't like it.
On December 09 2014 08:42 Alakaslam wrote: Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
For shame if there is naebody to FITE
Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.
Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?
It is the right way
Indeed I waste post! I am trying to garner your response; indeed there is WIFOM
I now must read, and ask of ye! Let us see if Townread or scumread forms for I didn't see you earlier
On December 09 2014 08:42 Alakaslam wrote: Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
For shame if there is naebody to FITE
Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.
Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?
Why with everything going on do you not comment on it and instead only post about a joke and focus on fighting slam?
On December 09 2014 08:46 KelsierSC wrote: So i have noticed something with this set up. If you are scrooge just claim.
You should fully explain any holes so that we all know what you're talking about and then can discuss whether it's safe to do it. Don't like all your small 1 liner posts wasted on nothing.
On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred
Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.
And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?
While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.
I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because:
A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad
And
B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers
And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off
##vote 27ninjabunnies
Enjoy your date
I'm not brushing it off, I' trying to look at it objectively. I think what he said makes sense. A. I know what he said. I said he was talking about policy lynching and lurkers. I never specifically said what he thought about it.
I don't think it's scummy. I think people are making something scummy out of nothing.
Thanks for the vote I knew it was to happen eventually, but I figured Ritoky would be the first to do it!
And I will enjoy my date Food and alcohol. what's better?
Well no. You said people talking about lynching lurkers are "off" and he was an "easy target to look scummy" which is already a contradiction in one post and now you are saying you know what he said and it doesn't look bad and people are making mountains out of mole hills which is a contradiction with your first post. There's a great deal of backtracking in what you are saying and I don't like it.
where is the contradiction?
she seems to be saying other people might find it scummy \flag him but she doesn't think it is?
On December 09 2014 08:35 Vivax wrote: What froggy said is simple common sense but also something that never matters cause at the end of the day it's mostly some scummy looking person getting lynched.
I don't see it as scummy, just as something useless to talk about which isn't scummy at this stage of the game. The biggest accusation you could make is that he's so serious in a setting where people are kinda joking, but that's not enough to go with in my book. It's more like he's annoyed that people are discussing policies when in past games it always led to that statement of his making the most sense.
Null for me.
I don't like this post at all. Like i might like it less than frogs post
On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred
Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.
And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?
While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.
I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because:
A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad
And
B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers
And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off
##vote 27ninjabunnies
Enjoy your date
I'm not brushing it off, I' trying to look at it objectively. I think what he said makes sense. A. I know what he said. I said he was talking about policy lynching and lurkers. I never specifically said what he thought about it.
I don't think it's scummy. I think people are making something scummy out of nothing.
Thanks for the vote I knew it was to happen eventually, but I figured Ritoky would be the first to do it!
And I will enjoy my date Food and alcohol. what's better?
Well no. You said people talking about lynching lurkers are "off" and he was an "easy target to look scummy" which is already a contradiction in one post and now you are saying you know what he said and it doesn't look bad and people are making mountains out of mole hills which is a contradiction with your first post. There's a great deal of backtracking in what you are saying and I don't like it.
Ummm no, In every game I have played, people always first attack the guy who talks about policy lynching and lurkers, whether doing it is bad or good. The same thing is happening this game. I don't think it is alignment indicative for froggy. I would need him to talk more to get a read. I'm just saying that there's no sense in attacking someone for something that seems "scummy" when it isn't. It seems off to everyone else, which is why people are targeting him, you get what I'm saying?
On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote: @ Slam @ Damdred
Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.
And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?
While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.
I'm still here and haven't made an excuse about leaving? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying in bold at all though. It's one thing to talk about policy but this is showing that first and foremost you did not read his post because:
A) he wrote about not policy lynching lirkers because it's bad
And
B) he wrote about agreeing to policy lynch lurkers
And secondly you are defending a person that "is an easy target to be scum read" when that person has done genuinely scummy things and you are brushing it off
##vote 27ninjabunnies
Enjoy your date
I'm not brushing it off, I' trying to look at it objectively. I think what he said makes sense. A. I know what he said. I said he was talking about policy lynching and lurkers. I never specifically said what he thought about it.
I don't think it's scummy. I think people are making something scummy out of nothing.
Thanks for the vote I knew it was to happen eventually, but I figured Ritoky would be the first to do it!
And I will enjoy my date Food and alcohol. what's better?
Well no. You said people talking about lynching lurkers are "off" and he was an "easy target to look scummy" which is already a contradiction in one post and now you are saying you know what he said and it doesn't look bad and people are making mountains out of mole hills which is a contradiction with your first post. There's a great deal of backtracking in what you are saying and I don't like it.
On December 09 2014 08:42 Alakaslam wrote: Yes they come with great influence but even the sibling is inconvenienced by such things. The awkward intensifies to the sick; the lulz come to those who know
But ultimately my sis decided she would not trade my GF of Christmas past, (B. Friend of hers, I know slam so creepy whatever) because ultimately 100% men take some influence by this whereas legs, butthijole, arms be like 20, 45, 3; but of course ppl vary
Btw who scumreads me yet for wasting posts being vulgar? If no one is shocked by this chile then he DINNAE care anymore because he don't know why it all matters
For shame if there is naebody to FITE
Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.
Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?