|
Off-topic discussions pertaining to Gamergate will be moderated from page 5 onwards. |
Ah, the good old ad hominem. Why do you people always get angry when I disagree with you? I haven't said anything that reasonably should offend you. I said vocal minority, not majority. Afaik, no one in this thread has claimed these people represented the majority of the community.
To me, Scarletts popularity is a shining example of how the gaming community by and large are accepting of all people regardless of gender, race and orientation, and disproves any kind of pervasive misogynist culture that needs to be eradicated.
|
|
On November 18 2014 00:54 Stijn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:50 vult wrote: That second paragraph is kind of poorly written and off-topic. Sure, shedding light on what her family does is cool, but having 10+ lines telling what her parents and brother do, especially the line "they prefer to call their parents Rob and Joyce," seems kind of unnecessary. Well, a lot of people find it strange that I'm on first-name basis with my parents. It says something about your upbringing and family dynamics I suppose, so I think it makes sense to put that in if you're trying to sketch a background.
My mother would smack me if I called her by her first name, so it seems very weird to me.
|
Well, there you go!
|
On November 18 2014 00:50 vult wrote: That second paragraph is kind of poorly written and off-topic. Sure, shedding light on what her family does is cool, but having 10+ lines telling what her parents and brother do, especially the line "they prefer to call their parents Rob and Joyce," seems kind of unnecessary.
The New Yorker is strange, though, so I understand why it's there. Grats to Scarlett on the publicity.
Actually I think it gives perspective on the person that you wouldn't otherwise have. I like how the article details some of her family's personal time (making Fajitas, gaming together, etc.). It's very humanizing.
I thought the article was well written.
|
On November 18 2014 00:26 Killscreen wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:17 Conti wrote:On November 18 2014 00:08 Killscreen wrote:On November 17 2014 23:13 Ragnarork wrote:On November 17 2014 20:01 Killscreen wrote:On November 17 2014 19:54 Stijn wrote:On November 17 2014 19:48 Killscreen wrote:On November 17 2014 19:23 Ragnarork wrote:On November 17 2014 19:18 WigglingSquid wrote:On November 17 2014 18:55 Killscreen wrote: [quote] Yeah, I must have. Link(s)? I'd like to invite posters to ignore the request for links. Please don't derail this thread with gamergate nonsense and debate club quibbles. There's no such "links" anyway. It's all in the Automated Ban List thread, and requires digging. One could also look for threads that spawned at that time (was it an IPL ?) to see the kind of comments. That's just scattered in a lot of places. But I agree, no such point in reviving this. So there is no evidence of this alleged shit storm, and yet we are just supposed to accept it as gospel. Sounds about right, and in accordance with the anti GG movement. There is no evidence to support my initial quote either. The article does mention gamergame, and it is pretty damn apparent that the article is GG related, so I don't see why you guys seem so reluctant to discuss this major aspect of the article. Scarlett is one of the most popular and beloved players in the community, and yet we are supposed to be these bigoted misogynists. Am I not allowed to point out this glaring contradiction? GamerGate? Have you seen how huge that article is? GamerGate is mentioned 3 times, of which only one really goes into it. "Major aspect of the article", what? I've been reading threads and chats for a while and when Scarlett was mentioned, people would make often hurtful comments about her gender. You can probably dig up "evidence" by looking up reddit threads about her from a while back and checking the downvoted comments. Beyond that I honestly don't see it as big enough of a deal to do the work to present you with a list of links. The plural of anecdotes is not evidence. People like to present these guys as representative of us, but never feel required to actually prove that they actually do represent us, that they are not a small vocal minority. Even though the burden of evidence lies with the people making these claims, I would offer Scarletts popularity as evidence that this simply isn't the case. But fine. You people are obviously not interested in discussing it, so I'll let it go. It's shame though. This stuff is important. This is not evidence. These are the facts. Either you accept the facts (that are scattered, sorry for your lazy ass, it's not compiled in one nicely formatted article), or you dismiss them, but then we can't do anything for you. Sorry not to be a banling to provide you with a more accurate description (like maybe stats, etc) of what happened at this time, but as a regular poster, there was a noticeable _increase_. Which is not to say it was not minor, but that was still noticeable, which is still alarming. Not sure what you meant by "This is not evidence. These are the facts". Yes, some people undoubtedly posted some nasty stuff. I believe you. What I don't agree with is that it is particularly alarming or that this is evidence that proves the gaming community needs to change it's views and culture to better accommodate women and adopt feminist ideals. Scarletts enormous popularity makes it pretty hard to make that claim, and I think the article dropped the ball not pointing that out. The article made it pretty clear that the SC2 community supports Scarlett, despite idiots being present. Heck, there's a quote that basically goes "Gaming community minus harassment equals Starcraft community", which is one hell of a compliment. So I'm not sure what your issue is to begin with. My issue with that is that SC is framed as an exception that proves the rule. Why isn't the allegedly sexist fighting game community the exception that proves the rule? We are definitely in the wrong thread for this kind of discussion. Neither this thread nor the article is about sexism in gamer communities.
|
On November 17 2014 19:27 lichter wrote: Khaldor and Wolf often gave shoutouts during Code A. those were the days.
|
On November 18 2014 00:53 Killscreen wrote: Ah, the good old ad hominem. Why do you people always get angry when I disagree with you? I haven't said anything that reasonably should offend you. I said vocal minority, not majority. Afaik, no one in this thread has claimed these people represented the majority of the community.
To me, Scarletts popularity is a shining example of how the gaming community by and large are accepting of all people regardless of gender, race and orientation, and disproves any kind of pervasive misogynist culture that needs to be eradicated.
You are wrong and let me show you why:
If the gaming community was by and large accepting of all people regardless of gender, race, and orientation, as you mentioned, then Scarlett's popularity would not be a shining example of anything. Scarlett is an amazingly talented foreign player. She's on a level far higher than many Koreans even, and is capable of bringing down giants like Bomber, MC and PartinG. It's natural that she be a well liked well accepted player - she deserves it.
Rather, the fact that you believe that her success is an example of how the gaming community accepts trans-gendered people simply highlights your own bigotry. The fact is she has not had the easiest of times. Her skill is much greater than she received credit for - for a long time...
Please can we not let one guy hijack this thread? I know I'm partially to blame for continuing to engage him...
|
On November 18 2014 01:18 DinoMight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:50 vult wrote: That second paragraph is kind of poorly written and off-topic. Sure, shedding light on what her family does is cool, but having 10+ lines telling what her parents and brother do, especially the line "they prefer to call their parents Rob and Joyce," seems kind of unnecessary.
The New Yorker is strange, though, so I understand why it's there. Grats to Scarlett on the publicity. Actually I think it gives perspective on the person that you wouldn't otherwise have. I like how the article details some of her family's personal time (making Fajitas, gaming together, etc.). It's very humanizing. I thought the article was well written.
it's not just any publication... you don't just get to write something for the new yorker. of course it's damn well written. halfway through and and it's great to be honest.
|
You'll have to explain how that makes me bigoted. I stated earlier that she has earned her popularity.
It's a shining example because the gaming community is under attack for being sexist.
|
There's a good reason The New Yorker is considered the gold standard for longform journalism. They really dive into their stories like no one else and manage to consistently get me engaged and interested in topics I normally never think about. In this case, the author (who is obviously a newcomer to e-sports) manages to do a better job of explaining the scene than a lot of "gaming journalists" can do despite following it closely for years. Great article.
|
On November 18 2014 01:45 awesomoecalypse wrote: There's a good reason The New Yorker is considered the gold standard for longform journalism. They really dive into their stories like no one else and manage to consistently get me engaged and interested in topics I normally never think about. In this case, the author (who is obviously a newcomer to e-sports) manages to do a better job of explaining the scene than a lot of "gaming journalists" can do despite following it closely for years. Great article. Very true. I had a good laugh at his bafflement at things like "gas pool". you never really think about how odd all the terminology we use sounds to a complete outsider, and how difficult it can be to follow what's really happening.
|
On November 18 2014 01:23 DinoMight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:53 Killscreen wrote: Ah, the good old ad hominem. Why do you people always get angry when I disagree with you? I haven't said anything that reasonably should offend you. I said vocal minority, not majority. Afaik, no one in this thread has claimed these people represented the majority of the community.
To me, Scarletts popularity is a shining example of how the gaming community by and large are accepting of all people regardless of gender, race and orientation, and disproves any kind of pervasive misogynist culture that needs to be eradicated.
You are wrong and let me show you why: If the gaming community was by and large accepting of all people regardless of gender, race, and orientation, as you mentioned, then Scarlett's popularity would not be a shining example of anything. Scarlett is an amazingly talented foreign player. She's on a level far higher than many Koreans even, and is capable of bringing down giants like Bomber, MC and PartinG. It's natural that she be a well liked well accepted player - she deserves it. Rather, the fact that you believe that her success is an example of how the gaming community accepts trans-gendered people simply highlights your own bigotry. The fact is she has not had the easiest of times. Her skill is much greater than she received credit for - for a long time... Please can we not let one guy hijack this thread? I know I'm partially to blame for continuing to engage him...
Do you not know the meaning of the word bigotry?
|
Wow! What a great article! I linked this on fb, hopefully some friends or relatives read it and get a kick out of it. It really seems like the perfect article to teach newcomers about the scene and hopefully even interest them!
Beyond that, the guy is just a great writer. Dat vocab.
|
Really well-written article, and I am very impressed by the author's range of esports knowledge given how recently he discovered the scene. His explanation of esports for outsiders is also really well done, he hits all the important points and communicates the significance without getting bogged down in trying to summarize all the different rules and strategies. Also, given his frequent of use of Starcraft and Dota 2 examples over League of Legends, I get the feeling that he visits TL quite a bit.
+ Show Spoiler +On November 18 2014 01:23 DinoMight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:53 Killscreen wrote: Ah, the good old ad hominem. Why do you people always get angry when I disagree with you? I haven't said anything that reasonably should offend you. I said vocal minority, not majority. Afaik, no one in this thread has claimed these people represented the majority of the community.
To me, Scarletts popularity is a shining example of how the gaming community by and large are accepting of all people regardless of gender, race and orientation, and disproves any kind of pervasive misogynist culture that needs to be eradicated.
You are wrong and let me show you why: If the gaming community was by and large accepting of all people regardless of gender, race, and orientation, as you mentioned, then Scarlett's popularity would not be a shining example of anything. Scarlett is an amazingly talented foreign player. She's on a level far higher than many Koreans even, and is capable of bringing down giants like Bomber, MC and PartinG. It's natural that she be a well liked well accepted player - she deserves it. Rather, the fact that you believe that her success is an example of how the gaming community accepts trans-gendered people simply highlights your own bigotry. The fact is she has not had the easiest of times. Her skill is much greater than she received credit for - for a long time... Please can we not let one guy hijack this thread? I know I'm partially to blame for continuing to engage him... On November 18 2014 01:35 Killscreen wrote: You'll have to explain how that makes me bigoted. I stated earlier that she has earned her popularity.
It's a shining example because the gaming community is under attack for being sexist.
I wouldn't say that the gaming community is "by and large accepting of all people." It may be a vocal minority that is actively racist/sexist, or it may be the majority, but regardless, the people who have the power to most effectively speak out against that kind of behavior almost never do. Scarlett's success doesn't change that fact.
|
On November 18 2014 01:58 RuiBarbO wrote:Really well-written article, and I am very impressed by the author's range of esports knowledge given how recently he discovered the scene. His explanation of esports for outsiders is also really well done, he hits all the important points and communicates the significance without getting bogged down in trying to summarize all the different rules and strategies. Also, given his frequent of use of Starcraft and Dota 2 examples over League of Legends, I get the feeling that he visits TL quite a bit. + Show Spoiler +On November 18 2014 01:23 DinoMight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:53 Killscreen wrote: Ah, the good old ad hominem. Why do you people always get angry when I disagree with you? I haven't said anything that reasonably should offend you. I said vocal minority, not majority. Afaik, no one in this thread has claimed these people represented the majority of the community.
To me, Scarletts popularity is a shining example of how the gaming community by and large are accepting of all people regardless of gender, race and orientation, and disproves any kind of pervasive misogynist culture that needs to be eradicated.
You are wrong and let me show you why: If the gaming community was by and large accepting of all people regardless of gender, race, and orientation, as you mentioned, then Scarlett's popularity would not be a shining example of anything. Scarlett is an amazingly talented foreign player. She's on a level far higher than many Koreans even, and is capable of bringing down giants like Bomber, MC and PartinG. It's natural that she be a well liked well accepted player - she deserves it. Rather, the fact that you believe that her success is an example of how the gaming community accepts trans-gendered people simply highlights your own bigotry. The fact is she has not had the easiest of times. Her skill is much greater than she received credit for - for a long time... Please can we not let one guy hijack this thread? I know I'm partially to blame for continuing to engage him... On November 18 2014 01:35 Killscreen wrote: You'll have to explain how that makes me bigoted. I stated earlier that she has earned her popularity.
It's a shining example because the gaming community is under attack for being sexist. I wouldn't say that the gaming community is "by and large accepting of all people." It may be a vocal minority that is actively racist/sexist, or it may be the majority, but regardless, the people who have the power to most effectively speak out against that kind of behavior almost never do. Scarlett's success doesn't change that fact.
Mods were apparently pretty swift with their ban hammers here, and someone said the reddit posts were heavily downmodded, so there is that. In my experience the community has been rather swift in denouncing behavior like that.
Yet this meme of "sexists neckbeard virgins" persists.
|
On November 18 2014 02:07 Killscreen wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 01:58 RuiBarbO wrote:Really well-written article, and I am very impressed by the author's range of esports knowledge given how recently he discovered the scene. His explanation of esports for outsiders is also really well done, he hits all the important points and communicates the significance without getting bogged down in trying to summarize all the different rules and strategies. Also, given his frequent of use of Starcraft and Dota 2 examples over League of Legends, I get the feeling that he visits TL quite a bit. + Show Spoiler +On November 18 2014 01:23 DinoMight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 18 2014 00:53 Killscreen wrote: Ah, the good old ad hominem. Why do you people always get angry when I disagree with you? I haven't said anything that reasonably should offend you. I said vocal minority, not majority. Afaik, no one in this thread has claimed these people represented the majority of the community.
To me, Scarletts popularity is a shining example of how the gaming community by and large are accepting of all people regardless of gender, race and orientation, and disproves any kind of pervasive misogynist culture that needs to be eradicated.
You are wrong and let me show you why: If the gaming community was by and large accepting of all people regardless of gender, race, and orientation, as you mentioned, then Scarlett's popularity would not be a shining example of anything. Scarlett is an amazingly talented foreign player. She's on a level far higher than many Koreans even, and is capable of bringing down giants like Bomber, MC and PartinG. It's natural that she be a well liked well accepted player - she deserves it. Rather, the fact that you believe that her success is an example of how the gaming community accepts trans-gendered people simply highlights your own bigotry. The fact is she has not had the easiest of times. Her skill is much greater than she received credit for - for a long time... Please can we not let one guy hijack this thread? I know I'm partially to blame for continuing to engage him... On November 18 2014 01:35 Killscreen wrote: You'll have to explain how that makes me bigoted. I stated earlier that she has earned her popularity.
It's a shining example because the gaming community is under attack for being sexist. I wouldn't say that the gaming community is "by and large accepting of all people." It may be a vocal minority that is actively racist/sexist, or it may be the majority, but regardless, the people who have the power to most effectively speak out against that kind of behavior almost never do. Scarlett's success doesn't change that fact. Mods were apparently pretty swift with their ban hammers here, and someone said the reddit posts were heavily downmodded, so there is that. In my experience the community has been rather swift in denouncing behavior like that. Yet this meme of "sexists neckbeard virgins" persists. Your argument is all fine and dandy, but it has less and less to do with the article this thread is about. This is not a gamergate thread, and it should not become one.
|
East Gorteau22261 Posts
The Gamergate discussion stops now.
|
On November 18 2014 02:19 Zealously wrote: The Gamergate discussion stops now.
Thank god.
|
Wow wall of text hit me hard but i survived to the end. Good article very thorough.
thx to Scarlett for this chance to know her little better
|
|
|
|