Hold on, going to ask BH how he RNGd scum D1.
[I] TLLOLOTGDTM - Page 33
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
Hold on, going to ask BH how he RNGd scum D1. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On October 13 2014 06:58 Lord Tolkien wrote: Im fine with jeff as well. But. Hold on, going to ask BH how he RNGd scum D1. I'm not RNGing. Especially this late. He uses some function...I forget what it's called or how it works. | ||
mordek
United States12704 Posts
On October 13 2014 06:56 WaveofShadow wrote: Mordek did you read what I wrote about LT? Do you think it makes sense for him to do what he did? I read he was in your top 2, and you had some kind of read on him and voted. LT then voted Asmo with no explanation. I made some comments after being accused of sheeping with your vote and LT has not convinced me anyone else is scummier. | ||
ketchup
14521 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On October 13 2014 07:04 mordek wrote: I read he was in your top 2, and you had some kind of read on him and voted. LT then voted Asmo with no explanation. I made some comments after being accused of sheeping with your vote and LT has not convinced me anyone else is scummier. No I meant this. On October 13 2014 05:41 WaveofShadow wrote: No, I expect you to do more. If you think that latest post was a buddying attempt you're sorely mistaken. The bolded is exactly why I don't think he's scum either, but pre-flip association IS a bit dangerous so I can't discount it completely. Essentially my reasoning on LT is the fact that the wagons at the time were him and MB...LT then unvotes MB...as scum there is absolutely ZERO reason to do that if MB is town and you can pull off a mislynch. MB could still be scum but I have other reasons to believe he may not be and I'm not sure I want to force the issue. | ||
Requizen
United States33802 Posts
On October 13 2014 06:38 Cixah wrote: No patience. I had things to do today. Most of the reasoning that the majority of the people have come to seems slightly influenced by wave or alaric in some way. Which is fine unless we don't actually get a good lynch after tonight. My reads right now. Soniv is majority town. His lurkyness right now is still mostly in the favor of town when it comes to who has pressed who. I'd like to see more of his opinion on Alaric and Wave's position, preferably before the lynch in 3 hrs. Wave is town. He's being augmentative but only because he's digging for more information. Assuming he doesn't die tonight, we'll have a decent idea of what's to come for d2. Moonbear and Tolkin seem the most scummy to me right now. Moonbear's posts have been analyzed and I really have nothing new to add to them other than I think the lynch on him is probably not tonight. I would feel more comfortable if we had a vigi shot or something similar for him, but that's really not my call. Tolkin's posts have been sporatically themed with a very heavy dose of "Cause Dissension at every Turn". His rabid unwillingness to answer any sort of questions in reguards to reads, why he's voting Bandwagon, and never moving any town facing conversation forward. Comadose hasn't said anything, but if he makes it to day 2 I think he'll make more of an appearance. For now I'm willing to lean on neutral because he legit has 1 page worth of filter. Post more. I need to know how you feel in this game, Specifically about Wave, Soniv, Tolkin, and Asmo. Ketchep leans town for me. I'm not convinced he's The Towniest Town in Town, but he's moving in that direction. Asmo is town. Azladar is Null for me. I'm still unsure how to read his, mordek, jeff's REALLY early bandwagon but it doesn't sit well at all with me. For now those 3 or neutral. Req is leans town but is playing like a wounded sheep. Req how do you feel about Azladar, Mordek and Jeff? I'm still holding my vote for now, but most likely it will be used on Moonbear. I'm not convinced outside of last second heroics that you're not scum. Either that or you're just playing with a giant veil over your words because you want people to read way to deep into your posts and find nothing. Alzadar and Mordek are strange. They have a lot of posts but I don't think they've said too much that's substantive. It makes them suspicious but I feel like they might just be biding their time. Jeff is a shitter. His shit posts make him a bad person but not necessarily scum. I wouldn't be upset/surprised if he died but I'm not pushing it right now. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On October 13 2014 07:05 ketchup wrote: Why does a ghandi bandwagon make more sense than comadose? Especially when comadose is already on the Ghandi bandwagon? Because if we're coinflipping one of those two has an excuse to not be here. The other doesn't. | ||
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
Geez tough crowd I'll talk more when it's over | ||
Alaric
France45622 Posts
See my post right after yours for a more detailed explanation. Although in retrospect I told myself that overly clinging to one's first impression and being fiercely confrontational was also something Tolkien did, and in the very same post I wrote that it made me rethink a bit if that wasn't a town move from me. Why wouldn't Moonbear benefit from the same treatment for how he behaved? It could be pointed out that both you and Tolkien have some experience under your belts, which makes me more likely to "accept" that there's a reason behind you doing that I'm too green to grasp yet. On the other hand, just because it's Moonbear's first game doesn't mean he's not maybe better at this kind of things than you. An issue for me here is that I have no idea what "serious" Moonbear is like, since he's always that jolly cheerful fellow with us in the off-topic thread (heck, even when he warns me it's more like "PSA from your friendly neighbour"!), which muddies my expectations. But in the end I said I'd rather vote for someone dubious than an afk*, so I'm looking at him right now. Moonbear, what that means is that you're close to a default lynch than a 100% scum read for me, so if you wanna stay alive it's up to you buddy! Be convincing, preferable before I go to bed. * my "policy" in terms of lynching lurkers is that I assume noone will lie and pretend they have RL stuff to justify them lurking, and Mafia's still a game in the end, so I'd rather have everyone play. It means I'm wary of lynching people who've been away for non-game reasons, while someone who participated, even if he's lynched day 1 will have at least had a go at it (syntax?). Obviously the more time passes the less it holds, and I won't be as "lenient" in that regard come day 2. Cf. the "carebear" post. | ||
ketchup
14521 Posts
On October 13 2014 07:11 GhandiEAGLE wrote: What I cant be watching a Seahawks game? Geez tough crowd I'll talk more when it's over Pretty sure you could do both especially considering that there is quite a bit of down time in between plays. I'm watching Worlds while reading this thread. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
I think I just got a little more confident in my voting. | ||
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
ketchup
14521 Posts
| ||
ketchup
14521 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On October 13 2014 07:13 Alaric wrote: See my post right after yours for a more detailed explanation. Although in retrospect I told myself that overly clinging to one's first impression and being fiercely confrontational was also something Tolkien did, and in the very same post I wrote that it made me rethink a bit if that wasn't a town move from me. Why wouldn't Moonbear benefit from the same treatment for how he behaved? It could be pointed out that both you and Tolkien have some experience under your belts, which makes me more likely to "accept" that there's a reason behind you doing that I'm too green to grasp yet. On the other hand, just because it's Moonbear's first game doesn't mean he's not maybe better at this kind of things than you. An issue for me here is that I have no idea what "serious" Moonbear is like, since he's always that jolly cheerful fellow with us in the off-topic thread (heck, even when he warns me it's more like "PSA from your friendly neighbour"!), which muddies my expectations. But in the end I said I'd rather vote for someone dubious than an afk*, so I'm looking at him right now. Moonbear, what that means is that you're close to a default lynch than a 100% scum read for me, so if you wanna stay alive it's up to you buddy! Be convincing, preferable before I go to bed. * my "policy" in terms of lynching lurkers is that I assume noone will lie and pretend they have RL stuff to justify them lurking, and Mafia's still a game in the end, so I'd rather have everyone play. It means I'm wary of lynching people who've been away for non-game reasons, while someone who participated, even if he's lynched day 1 will have at least had a go at it (syntax?). Obviously the more time passes the less it holds, and I won't be as "lenient" in that regard come day 2. Cf. the "carebear" post. I have no idea what you're talking about here. I was referring to the fact that you removed your vote from Asmo and then he goes and scums it up a little by talking about how he's giving himself and others opening to control his voting patterns rather than take responsibility for them himself. | ||
ketchup
14521 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On October 13 2014 07:16 ketchup wrote: By the way, if moonbear is a no show, this means he is mod killed anyways. I think stacking mod kill + lynch on moonbear is actually a really good town play. Rather than letting people dictate RNG kill or anything else. This only makes sense if you assume we're not lynching scum today or MB is town. | ||
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
I was fairly certain I was on the right track, especially when the Swaglord bandwagon got some steam. But now the dust is settling and MB has a bunch of votes. I'm not as certain as I was before. | ||
ketchup
14521 Posts
On October 13 2014 07:17 WaveofShadow wrote: This only makes sense if you assume we're not lynching scum today or MB is town. If moonbear is a no show, is that scum play? Are you serious? | ||
| ||