|
On June 12 2014 04:22 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 03:51 Chromatically wrote:On June 12 2014 03:36 ritoky wrote:Idk, I don't think Koshi's suspicions of Chrom are completely unwarranted. I found this interaction very strange: On June 11 2014 06:55 justanothertownie wrote:On June 11 2014 06:50 sinani206 wrote:On June 11 2014 06:46 Chromatically wrote:
Sinani what do you think of JAT? Mostly one-liners and wishy washy, I don't really have time right now to quote because I have a meeting at 2:50 but if he keeps this kind of useless posting up I can see a chance of him being red. In this post sinani basically gives a null read on me. His reasoning can be used for almost 100 % of the players in this game. I think he added the part with the "chance of being red" to create the illusion that his question towards me had something to do with scumhunting -> tries to get Chrom off his ass. At the time, I don't feel like JAT had done anything that was alignment indicative in the slightest, so I don't really know why Chrom would ping sinani for a read on him. I just think in some regards you were baiting him. However, sinani's response is pretty horrible imo. It reads forced, noncommittal, and not really substantive. I think JAT was right to pounce on it and for good reason and I think he seems more town for it. I explained why I asked this. And I didn't like your explanation. JAT made a joke/dodged sinani's question and you have this expectation of him that he was supposed to get a strong read off of it. His response is crap, but sinani says he dodged it and has to go. Then you criticize him for not scum hunting.....the guy just said he was leaving?
Did I really? Funny, I don't remember that.
I expected that, if sinani thought that JAT's post was weird enough to ask him a question about it, sinani would mention the post or the question in some way in his read on JAT. He doesn't, and posts something highly noncommittal instead. And, again, this is all in the first few hours of the day.
But sorry, I forgot that leaving the thread excuses you from scumhunting.
|
I really like how ritoky comes in and randomly throws some suspicion on me while completely ignoring the case on Koshi (or anything else relevant to the lynch today).
|
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else.
|
On June 12 2014 05:00 Chromatically wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 04:22 ritoky wrote:On June 12 2014 03:51 Chromatically wrote:On June 12 2014 03:36 ritoky wrote:Idk, I don't think Koshi's suspicions of Chrom are completely unwarranted. I found this interaction very strange: On June 11 2014 06:55 justanothertownie wrote:On June 11 2014 06:50 sinani206 wrote:On June 11 2014 06:46 Chromatically wrote:
Sinani what do you think of JAT? Mostly one-liners and wishy washy, I don't really have time right now to quote because I have a meeting at 2:50 but if he keeps this kind of useless posting up I can see a chance of him being red. In this post sinani basically gives a null read on me. His reasoning can be used for almost 100 % of the players in this game. I think he added the part with the "chance of being red" to create the illusion that his question towards me had something to do with scumhunting -> tries to get Chrom off his ass. At the time, I don't feel like JAT had done anything that was alignment indicative in the slightest, so I don't really know why Chrom would ping sinani for a read on him. I just think in some regards you were baiting him. However, sinani's response is pretty horrible imo. It reads forced, noncommittal, and not really substantive. I think JAT was right to pounce on it and for good reason and I think he seems more town for it. I explained why I asked this. And I didn't like your explanation. JAT made a joke/dodged sinani's question and you have this expectation of him that he was supposed to get a strong read off of it. His response is crap, but sinani says he dodged it and has to go. Then you criticize him for not scum hunting.....the guy just said he was leaving? Did I really? Funny, I don't remember that. I expected that, if sinani thought that JAT's post was weird enough to ask him a question about it, sinani would mention the post or the question in some way in his read on JAT. He doesn't, and posts something highly noncommittal instead. And, again, this is all in the first few hours of the day. But sorry, I forgot that leaving the thread excuses you from scumhunting.
You're right, we should all start hunting scum while we have no accessibility to the thread.
Also, you contradicted yourself in here. Just sayin.
I don't particularly like sinani's response either, as I said, it was forced noncommittal, and lacked substance. But I do agree with Koshi to some degree; I think your asking of the question in the first place is suspect. And then your follow-up is way too strong in proportion, it reeks of TMI to me.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On June 12 2014 04:17 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2014 13:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 11 2014 13:26 Chairman Ray wrote:On June 11 2014 13:23 batsnacks wrote:
Chairman, without reading the above post, I really wish both your posts about me weren't perfectly sequential dissections of literally everything I said. Sorry, I'll try to keep it brief from now on. You can just read the "Overall" statement at the end Look I like everything you said I think it's great. I read the whole thing. You got an A+ on your homework for sure. I really, really, really hate that you commented on everything I said in the order I said it in both posts though. If you are mafia which I think you probably are, that's the only thing you should have changed to make it better. This is stupid. There's nothing wrong with an in-depth post by post analysis and the fact that newer players don't know this is just a sign of how spammy and annoying the meta has gotten .
Post by post is pretty bad actually, usually.
|
gumshoe, I couldn't help but notice that your post is lacking a read on Koshi. Care to indulge me?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On June 12 2014 05:08 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:00 Chromatically wrote:On June 12 2014 04:22 ritoky wrote:On June 12 2014 03:51 Chromatically wrote:On June 12 2014 03:36 ritoky wrote:Idk, I don't think Koshi's suspicions of Chrom are completely unwarranted. I found this interaction very strange: On June 11 2014 06:55 justanothertownie wrote:On June 11 2014 06:50 sinani206 wrote:On June 11 2014 06:46 Chromatically wrote:
Sinani what do you think of JAT? Mostly one-liners and wishy washy, I don't really have time right now to quote because I have a meeting at 2:50 but if he keeps this kind of useless posting up I can see a chance of him being red. In this post sinani basically gives a null read on me. His reasoning can be used for almost 100 % of the players in this game. I think he added the part with the "chance of being red" to create the illusion that his question towards me had something to do with scumhunting -> tries to get Chrom off his ass. At the time, I don't feel like JAT had done anything that was alignment indicative in the slightest, so I don't really know why Chrom would ping sinani for a read on him. I just think in some regards you were baiting him. However, sinani's response is pretty horrible imo. It reads forced, noncommittal, and not really substantive. I think JAT was right to pounce on it and for good reason and I think he seems more town for it. I explained why I asked this. And I didn't like your explanation. JAT made a joke/dodged sinani's question and you have this expectation of him that he was supposed to get a strong read off of it. His response is crap, but sinani says he dodged it and has to go. Then you criticize him for not scum hunting.....the guy just said he was leaving? Did I really? Funny, I don't remember that. I expected that, if sinani thought that JAT's post was weird enough to ask him a question about it, sinani would mention the post or the question in some way in his read on JAT. He doesn't, and posts something highly noncommittal instead. And, again, this is all in the first few hours of the day. But sorry, I forgot that leaving the thread excuses you from scumhunting. You're right, we should all start hunting scum while we have no accessibility to the thread. Also, you contradicted yourself in here. Just sayin. I don't particularly like sinani's response either, as I said, it was forced noncommittal, and lacked substance. But I do agree with Koshi to some degree; I think your asking of the question in the first place is suspect. And then your follow-up is way too strong in proportion, it reeks of TMI to me.
can you explain exactly what you mean by this for me, please?
|
On June 12 2014 05:08 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 04:17 strongandbig wrote:On June 11 2014 13:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 11 2014 13:26 Chairman Ray wrote:On June 11 2014 13:23 batsnacks wrote:
Chairman, without reading the above post, I really wish both your posts about me weren't perfectly sequential dissections of literally everything I said. Sorry, I'll try to keep it brief from now on. You can just read the "Overall" statement at the end Look I like everything you said I think it's great. I read the whole thing. You got an A+ on your homework for sure. I really, really, really hate that you commented on everything I said in the order I said it in both posts though. If you are mafia which I think you probably are, that's the only thing you should have changed to make it better. This is stupid. There's nothing wrong with an in-depth post by post analysis and the fact that newer players don't know this is just a sign of how spammy and annoying the meta has gotten . Post by post is pretty bad actually, usually.
Marv you need new adjectives. "Bad" and "terrible" are getting stale.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else.
remember oats on like d4 in ## and i was absolutely convinced he was mafia
but eventually i had to let it go because everyone didn't seem to go for it no matter how hard i pushed it
search in your heart
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On June 12 2014 05:12 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:08 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2014 04:17 strongandbig wrote:On June 11 2014 13:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 11 2014 13:26 Chairman Ray wrote:On June 11 2014 13:23 batsnacks wrote:
Chairman, without reading the above post, I really wish both your posts about me weren't perfectly sequential dissections of literally everything I said. Sorry, I'll try to keep it brief from now on. You can just read the "Overall" statement at the end Look I like everything you said I think it's great. I read the whole thing. You got an A+ on your homework for sure. I really, really, really hate that you commented on everything I said in the order I said it in both posts though. If you are mafia which I think you probably are, that's the only thing you should have changed to make it better. This is stupid. There's nothing wrong with an in-depth post by post analysis and the fact that newer players don't know this is just a sign of how spammy and annoying the meta has gotten . Post by post is pretty bad actually, usually. Marv you need new adjectives. "Bad" and "terrible" are getting stale.
you are just atrocious
appalling
despicable
awful
your hair smells of feces
your aura has the consistency of sewage
|
On June 12 2014 05:14 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:12 batsnacks wrote:On June 12 2014 05:08 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2014 04:17 strongandbig wrote:On June 11 2014 13:31 batsnacks wrote:On June 11 2014 13:26 Chairman Ray wrote:On June 11 2014 13:23 batsnacks wrote:
Chairman, without reading the above post, I really wish both your posts about me weren't perfectly sequential dissections of literally everything I said. Sorry, I'll try to keep it brief from now on. You can just read the "Overall" statement at the end Look I like everything you said I think it's great. I read the whole thing. You got an A+ on your homework for sure. I really, really, really hate that you commented on everything I said in the order I said it in both posts though. If you are mafia which I think you probably are, that's the only thing you should have changed to make it better. This is stupid. There's nothing wrong with an in-depth post by post analysis and the fact that newer players don't know this is just a sign of how spammy and annoying the meta has gotten . Post by post is pretty bad actually, usually. Marv you need new adjectives. "Bad" and "terrible" are getting stale. you are just atrocious appalling despicable awful your hair smells of feces your aura has the consistency of sewage
Thou art a canker blossom
|
On June 12 2014 05:08 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:00 Chromatically wrote:On June 12 2014 04:22 ritoky wrote:On June 12 2014 03:51 Chromatically wrote:On June 12 2014 03:36 ritoky wrote:Idk, I don't think Koshi's suspicions of Chrom are completely unwarranted. I found this interaction very strange: On June 11 2014 06:55 justanothertownie wrote:On June 11 2014 06:50 sinani206 wrote:On June 11 2014 06:46 Chromatically wrote:
Sinani what do you think of JAT? Mostly one-liners and wishy washy, I don't really have time right now to quote because I have a meeting at 2:50 but if he keeps this kind of useless posting up I can see a chance of him being red. In this post sinani basically gives a null read on me. His reasoning can be used for almost 100 % of the players in this game. I think he added the part with the "chance of being red" to create the illusion that his question towards me had something to do with scumhunting -> tries to get Chrom off his ass. At the time, I don't feel like JAT had done anything that was alignment indicative in the slightest, so I don't really know why Chrom would ping sinani for a read on him. I just think in some regards you were baiting him. However, sinani's response is pretty horrible imo. It reads forced, noncommittal, and not really substantive. I think JAT was right to pounce on it and for good reason and I think he seems more town for it. I explained why I asked this. And I didn't like your explanation. JAT made a joke/dodged sinani's question and you have this expectation of him that he was supposed to get a strong read off of it. His response is crap, but sinani says he dodged it and has to go. Then you criticize him for not scum hunting.....the guy just said he was leaving? Did I really? Funny, I don't remember that. I expected that, if sinani thought that JAT's post was weird enough to ask him a question about it, sinani would mention the post or the question in some way in his read on JAT. He doesn't, and posts something highly noncommittal instead. And, again, this is all in the first few hours of the day. But sorry, I forgot that leaving the thread excuses you from scumhunting. You're right, we should all start hunting scum while we have no accessibility to the thread. Also, you contradicted yourself in here. Just sayin. I don't particularly like sinani's response either, as I said, it was forced noncommittal, and lacked substance. But I do agree with Koshi to some degree; I think your asking of the question in the first place is suspect. And then your follow-up is way too strong in proportion, it reeks of TMI to me.
You should scumhunt when you are in the thread. You could try to scumhunt when you are out of the thread, but I suspect it would be hard. Sorry for the confusion. Your original post implied that you were criticizing me for accusing sinani of not scumhunting when he left the thread. Obviously, the scumhunting in question should have occurred when he was in the thread at some point.
Do explain my contradiction.
|
On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else.
Lol
This beautiful example of a post by koshi is the very reason why people do one liner replies such as 'lol'.
I seriously dislike this 'everyone is an idiot' attitude from koshi. Do something more productive other than smearing shit all over the thread like marv is.
|
On June 12 2014 05:13 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else. remember oats on like d4 in ## and i was absolutely convinced he was mafia but eventually i had to let it go because everyone didn't seem to go for it no matter how hard i pushed it search in your heart
No. Chrom can still easily be scum. People are just not seeing that I do not want him instantly killed. I just say that he should be watched.
This entire wagon on me is wrong btw. And the one on batsnacks probably as well.
|
On June 12 2014 05:08 Chromatically wrote:
gumshoe, I couldn't help but notice that your post is lacking a read on Koshi. Care to indulge me?
I liked your push onto him, but I'm not a fan of how quickly the wagon picked up speed. That and alota people I don't like have been taking sucker punches at Koshi throughout the game ( namely chairman). As for the contradiction, it looks bad, but as someone who contradicts himself constantly I can totally see it coming out of town Koshi. Lastly, saying your gonna play awesome then not posting for ages is sorta asking to get lynched, scum Koshi is more careful that that / : I could be wrong( not a foreign state for me ) but at the moment I much rather lynch chair and I'd like to see what Koshi contributes while not under threat of lynch.
|
On June 12 2014 05:18 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else. Lol This beautiful example of a post by koshi is the very reason why people do one liner replies such as 'lol'. I seriously dislike this 'everyone is an idiot' attitude from koshi. Do something more productive other than smearing shit all over the thread like marv is.
Yes. I was looking for the "lol" reply with that post.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On June 12 2014 05:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else. remember oats on like d4 in ## and i was absolutely convinced he was mafia but eventually i had to let it go because everyone didn't seem to go for it no matter how hard i pushed it search in your heart No. Chrom can still easily be scum. People are just not seeing that I do not want him instantly killed. I just say that he should be watched. This entire wagon on me is wrong btw. And the one on batsnacks probably as well.
I don't think I'm interested in pursuing either of you today. Can we be carebear scumhunting buddies now?
|
On June 12 2014 05:20 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:18 Koshi wrote:On June 12 2014 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else. remember oats on like d4 in ## and i was absolutely convinced he was mafia but eventually i had to let it go because everyone didn't seem to go for it no matter how hard i pushed it search in your heart No. Chrom can still easily be scum. People are just not seeing that I do not want him instantly killed. I just say that he should be watched. This entire wagon on me is wrong btw. And the one on batsnacks probably as well. I don't think I'm interested in pursuing either of you today. Can we be carebear scumhunting buddies now?
meh, I can abandon ship on the tryhard stuff. It simply isn't working out.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On June 12 2014 05:21 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2014 05:20 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2014 05:18 Koshi wrote:On June 12 2014 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On June 12 2014 05:06 Koshi wrote:
Either I am really wrong or everybody else is really wrong.
I am going to go with everybody else. remember oats on like d4 in ## and i was absolutely convinced he was mafia but eventually i had to let it go because everyone didn't seem to go for it no matter how hard i pushed it search in your heart No. Chrom can still easily be scum. People are just not seeing that I do not want him instantly killed. I just say that he should be watched. This entire wagon on me is wrong btw. And the one on batsnacks probably as well. I don't think I'm interested in pursuing either of you today. Can we be carebear scumhunting buddies now? meh, I can abandon ship on the tryhard stuff. It simply isn't working out.
well i think i'm over you and Exo now, which is what i was feeling when i went to bed last night
kingofcats, ritoky, ketomai may be interesting but i need more
I'm not really sure on your MZ stuff, MZ can sometimes come across pretty useless as town at the start (he got lynched as town twice in two games just recently) whereas in PYP:LoL where Meapak was mafia, I thought Meapak looked really townie and productive early on until he went off the rails against you and turned really scummy.
|
Gumshoe, I don't see what makes you think I'm afraid to give out opinions on people. I think the vast majority of what's happening so far is silly speculation based on virtually nothing. I have no desire to join the super psycho-analyst club and explain why every little post means you either scum or town. When I've had opinions on people I've voiced them so far.
Though I think the early banter may serve a purpose, people are way to full of themselves if they honestly believe they can discern mafia based on whats happened so far. When I have something to add, I'll add it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
