|
On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote: rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point.
|
On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote: rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START"
You were the only one to mention rayn as being possibly scummy for it. There was no bandwagon and at the time you were answering a question Rayn asked Palmar so there is no rational way you could have thought that answering rayns question was defending rayn from a bandwagon.
Unless you think he was bandwagoning on himself.
|
I am not sure if i buy this. It just does not make any sense to me.
|
On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote: rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START"
If this is Coag posting you should know that's not how I lynch people. Rayn was in no danger.
|
On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote: The red reply thing? That was good. 3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply. rayn kept up pressure. Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote: If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote: pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote: You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point.
Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased.
-Koshi his judgement-
|
OH IS THAT WHY YOU ASKED
On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour?
Bullshit.
|
Like i have no idea why anyone would think they need to "defend" me or stop a bandwagon which isn't even there. When i read the post i actually thought Coag meant i was trying to start a bandwagon on Palmar which would make a bit more sense (although it's false) but there DEFINITELY was no abdwagon starting on me lol.
|
On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote: The red reply thing? That was good. 3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply. rayn kept up pressure. Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote: If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote: pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote: You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement-
The point is not about finding me scummy at the start, the point is why could you find that post defensive enough to list it as a major reason for your read but NOT think that coag, whom is clearly going massive over defense rage mode, is not?
|
On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:37 DarthPunk wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 19 2014 08:32 Koshi wrote: The red reply thing? That was good. 3 people were saying rayn case was good. He had to reply. rayn kept up pressure. Coag kept replying. With more caps.
I don't see overdefensive. Really. The all caps thing was not over defensive? But you agreed that I was over defensive. On March 19 2014 07:18 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:13 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:12 Koshi wrote:On March 19 2014 07:11 DarthPunk wrote:On March 19 2014 07:10 Koshi wrote: If anybody is interested I am following Holyflare atm. What does that mean? I think you are scummy scum. Why? You need to provide reasoning or your position is meaningless. I liked what Kush said. On March 19 2014 07:19 Koshi wrote: pointing out overdefensive post. Could be Coag. But it looks like Kush. For this post: On March 19 2014 07:00 DarthPunk wrote: You realise that policy thing was like over a year ago HF? I said I was going to policy vote coag before the game started and I did.
Further I don't think it is a shit policy. I literally would prefer the game to not have a 10 plus member Hydra in it.
I would think you were scum but you, you know, did the same thing last game as town so yeah. I want to know how on earth you though I was scummy/over defensive for that post, but Coag ragingin all caps was NOT over defensive. That seems like a very arbitrary decision for one thing to be over defensive and another far more defensive thing to not be. I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement- replying for reasons
|
On March 19 2014 08:44 Coagulation wrote:OH IS THAT WHY YOU ASKED Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour? Bullshit. I wanted Palmar to clarify his stance on DP's post, that's why there is the "what do you call it" line in the post. It was not clear to me what he was going to do.
|
On March 19 2014 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like i have no idea why anyone would think they need to "defend" me or stop a bandwagon which isn't even there. When i read the post i actually thought Coag meant i was trying to start a bandwagon on Palmar which would make a bit more sense (although it's false) but there DEFINITELY was no abdwagon starting on me lol.
No it wasn't there and the whole thing reeks of Post-hoc rationalisations.
|
If I wasn't going to bed I would ask you to search another topic to discuss rayn. But since I am going to bed and I will enjoy to read many mafia when I arrive at work I will not limit your artistic spirit.
|
Coag could you clarify what posts make you think there was a stupid bandwagon starting on me?
|
On March 19 2014 08:47 Koshi wrote: If I wasn't going to bed I would ask you to search another topic to discuss rayn. But since I am going to bed and I will enjoy to read many mafia when I arrive at work I will not limit your artistic spirit. What do you suggest?
|
Also why are you defending Coag? Is there a reason why he needs defending Koshi?
|
bullshit. YOU were refering to "NOTEWORTHY"
Bullshit bullshit
On March 19 2014 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote: rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point.
On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour?
There is nothing about DP HERE AT ALL "WHAT DO YOU CALL IT" IS REFERING TO NOTEWORTHY.
NOW YOU JUST GOT CAUGHT IN A LIE.
|
On March 19 2014 08:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:47 Koshi wrote: If I wasn't going to bed I would ask you to search another topic to discuss rayn. But since I am going to bed and I will enjoy to read many mafia when I arrive at work I will not limit your artistic spirit. What do you suggest? Pressure the other people that enter the thread. I have a feeling we will need info on many people and we need to draw them into the game by talking to them and pretending to find them very interesting. If we ignore them and talk too much about 1 subject and milk that subject till it is dry and vaporated these new guys will only read about 1 topic and will be disappointed. But when we engage in different topics with all the new guys we can have opinions by new guys on new guys and many discussions will be created.
This is a titanic game. thread has to be long.
|
On March 19 2014 08:49 Coagulation wrote:bullshit. YOU were refering to "NOTEWORTHY" Bullshit bullshit Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:41 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:36 Coagulation wrote:On March 19 2014 08:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 19 2014 08:01 Coagulation wrote: rayn ur bad and should feel bad Do you think your post was good and moved the thread forward. What was your plan on finding mafia with that post? This is the main question and if you do not answer me reasonably i am not going to move my vote. of course at the time I thought it was a good post. It was an attempt to stop a seemingly bad bandwagon based on pure bullshit. and then you jump up my ass for no reason and now Im wondering why the fuck im bothering trying to defend you from bullshit logic when your content to just spew bullshit logic all over me. I dont give a shit what you do with your vote. What was the bandwagon you were trying to stop? the one that would start with a slow chant of "RAYN WAS INACTIVE AT START" and turn to a maddening rumble of "RAYN WAS SCUMMY AT START" But that was not the point at all. It had already been clarified at that point. Show nested quote +On March 19 2014 07:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar can you explain to me why is it odd/weird/what do you call it that i posted at the start of the game and then didn't post for an hour? There is nothing about DP HERE AT ALL "WHAT DO YOU CALL IT" IS REFERING TO NOTEWORTHY. NOW YOU JUST GOT CAUGHT IN A LIE.
He is CLEARLY referencing my observation about rayn in that post. reading the thread is useful.
|
say what Coag? Where is the lie? I'll totally lynch rayn if you can prove he lied.
|
SO Rayn you get to pick an answer
A) Was it already clarified at that point and you made a useless fluff POST that your gonna pretend you didnt make now.
OR
B) You just told a lie about it being clarified at that point when its pretty fucking clear that wasnt your mindset at the time and now your backtracking.
PIck one.
|
|
|
|