|
On March 07 2014 08:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am fucking tired of discussing this with you two because you have no idea what you are talking about. I can read or post. Also I don't think we've discussed anything. You were entirely gone while I was posting yesterday, and I was gone while you were initially posting.
|
On March 07 2014 08:34 austinmcc wrote: But this is such a ... good response. If rayn believes 100000% in his plan, and things go WRONG with the plan, then LSB is right. There's no upside. Either rayn is trying to get a townie lynched, or rayn is mafia AND THE WHOLE PLAN WAS CREATED BY MAFIA IN THE FIRST PLACE AND THAT'S PROBABLY NOT A GOOD THING.
False.
Plan is uber-pro-town.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
it's just not interesting to talk about this close to deadline if it is not in relation to lynching mafia.
|
On March 06 2014 22:21 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2014 06:48 prplhz wrote:On March 06 2014 06:47 yamato77 wrote:On March 06 2014 06:43 Xatalos wrote:You mean to say "no" with this post? On March 06 2014 05:29 yamato77 wrote:On March 06 2014 05:14 prplhz wrote: Hi. yamato i really want to know what you think about me Not caught up yet. Some time before numbers are due I'll read the rest of the thread. Still not reading close enough. This is almost comical. Just to make this end. link Lol.... Dunno how I could miss that post. Phoneposting sucks etc. Well, that's good then. Show nested quote +On March 06 2014 14:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also i'll keep track of this: 1. Palmar [1,1] 2. Oatsmaster [3,1] 3. prplhz 4. Hopeless1der 5. Artanis[Xp] [11,11] 6. marvellosity 7. yamato77 8. austinmcc 9. Xatalos 10. gumshoe [2,?] 11. LSB [2,1] 12. raynpelikoneet [2,1] I picked 8 4 in the end. Seems like it wasn't such a good idea... There were less clashes than I thought. I also sent in my role choice, but apparently this choice isn't permanent, so it's not like it matters too much. A lot has happened while I was away. Mainly austin and gumshoe have come under new suspicion. Both resisted rayn's plan for bad reasons. Also LSB remains as a suspect. prphlz not so much anymore. I dunno about him, but at least he's pretty active in the discussion, so I'm not too fond of lynching him. I'm not truly sold on gumshoe. His stance against rayn here reminds me of his stance against me in GoT Mafia (I was pretty clearly townie and putting in a lot of effort, but he kept opposing me for dumb reasons). Then he pretty much went AFK and was town KP'd. On the other hand, as scum (granted it was a long time ago) he was a lot more passive and unnoticeable. Does he do this thing where he baits a lynch on himself as scum nowadays? austin... He's really focused on a pretty irrelevant topic (unlikely host speculation). I guess he does have a point, but it's not like all the roles will be greatly changed (maybe like DT, but probably not much else). I don't think it's that bad to talk about this topic in itself, but he hasn't really done anything else worthwhile. Most importantly he has done nothing to help with the D1 lynch and has just 100% focused on a pretty irrelevant branch of the PYP stuff. He's certainly null at best and slightly scummy at worst (for contributing in a way that's overall not helpful and even anti-town by distracting the discussion and undermining rayn's plan). LSB has also mostly attacked rayn's plan, but at least he had some slight contributions to scumhunting (rayn+austin+Hopeless). Although he seems VERY fast to jump to conclusions (rayn Mafia for shaky reasons, austin Mafia for one post (?), Hopeless Mafia for sheeping...). His crusade against rayn is also very tunnely and doesn't seem genuinely concerned about the best direction for town. It's more like he just wants to attack it for the sake of attacking it, not to determine if it's truly useful or not. His play is just pretty scummy and even at best it's just null. Hopeless seems to have dropped from the discussion entirely. He's an extreme sheep but I don't really think he's Mafia for it. More like just lazy/insecure. We'll see if he'll push anything of his own. I'm starting to feel pretty scum on yamato. True, he didn't pick 1 1 at the start, but even more worryingly he's become very antagonistic and useless. It's kinda like here (as scum): http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/423047-got-mafia-lords-and-liars?user=yamato77 On the other hand, as town, he usually feels quite townish (see http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/438132-tl-mafia-lxiv-a-game-of-intrigue?user=yamato77 - although it was a PM game so part of his contributions were in PM land). My preferred lynches would be yamato/LSB/austin atm. gumshoe doesn't really fit in my lynch candidates unless I'm convinced that this is scum gumshoe playing like this (against my experiences with him). Also someone pointed out that there isn't necessary a Survivor in this setup. And that seems to be the case currently, I guess. xatalos,
why did I "resist rayn's plans for bad reasons"? What are my reasons and why are they bad? How's the resisting bad, but then later you say I have a point, and it's not bad to talk about the topic. I know those aren't entirely non-congruent, but ... what reasons and why bad?
|
Also it's not very useful since the plan is already in motion. Better focus on the lynch now.
|
Well basically you had a slight point about there being changes to the roles based on if the receiver is town/Mafia. It's certainly possible and worth some thought. But it's not a reason to shut down the plan and certainly not worth spending a ton of time on when clearly it's just unlikely that this branch of thought would have any major impact.
|
On March 07 2014 08:48 Xatalos wrote: Well basically you had a slight point about there being changes to the roles based on if the receiver is town/Mafia. It's certainly possible and worth some thought. But it's not a reason to shut down the plan and certainly not worth spending a ton of time on when clearly it's just unlikely that this branch of thought would have any major impact. But you think that IF a shot happens that shouldn't, a RB happens wrong, etc. etc., then we should superkill whoever would have been responsible under the roles in the OP?
Like...the plan is multi-stage here. Rayn wants all this set up IN PART because later, when anything goes sideways, he believes we'll know the cause of the sidewaysness, and can apply a bullet/lynch to it. See his posts re: joats, shots, anything and everything, roleblocks.
BUT BESIDES THAT
What's my bad reason? You say LSB is attacking the plan just to attack it, but I just have nebulous BAD REASONS.
|
WHY THE FUCK WOULD A ROLEBLOCKER SUDDENLY BE A "RANDOM ROLEBLOCKER". YOU ARE SUGGESTING THINGS THAT ARE ENTIRELY DELUSIONAL!
|
Well, the bad reason is just that, that the host could change the roles after they're given out. Certainly there could be some slight changes, for example to DT (since otherwise it would be useless for Mafia), but that's just a bad reason to undermine the plan. But if you don't think I'm scum then why are you focusing so much on me?
|
|
Or the plan in general. It's not like we're going to change it now.
|
"You picked [blue]Day vigilante[blue]. Actually you don't have a gun but instead you have two smellyflowers you can give to people of your choice. Smellyflowers smell so bad the person is unable to post in thread for 24 hours once they have been given a smellyflower. Now i know you wanted to be a day vigilante but instead you became smellyflowerguy so trololol i'm a b-mod!"
-austin
|
You have selected the Jack of All Trades (JOAT) . Unfortunately, you are currently being held below deck aboard a vessel travelling from the West Indies to the New World. You are forced to vote for the current vote-leader because your master will punish you if you dont.
|
i'm gonna punch someone if i become smellyflowers guy instead of dayvig
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I'd love to be punished by my master. Just sayin'
|
too bad, you're gonna be a roleblocker marv.
|
On March 07 2014 09:00 Xatalos wrote: Well, the bad reason is just that, that the host could change the roles after they're given out. Certainly there could be some slight changes, for example to DT (since otherwise it would be useless for Mafia), but that's just a bad reason to undermine the plan. But if you don't think I'm scum then why are you focusing so much on me? All roles that may be chosen are in the spoilers below. Roles may have additional alterations based on whether they are picked by Town, Mafia or Third Party. Players who draft these roles may or may not be informed of these alterations after receiving these roles. I still can't tell what you think my reasons were, and why they're bad.
You think it's bad because the host wouldn't just change roles after they go out, even though the OP says there may be modifications and then goes on to add that you might or might not get notified of modifications, indicating that a couple different roles would change based on alignments (otherwise why make a notified/no notified distinction?)? Or it's bad to EVER undermine a plan that rayn comes up with? Or bad to undermine THIS plan?
Like, when I read your post, it says that I, myself, have bad reasons for resisting. Scummy reasons or just not good reasons to question things?
|
On March 07 2014 09:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: "You picked [blue]Day vigilante[blue]. Actually you don't have a gun but instead you have two smellyflowers you can give to people of your choice. Smellyflowers smell so bad the person is unable to post in thread for 24 hours once they have been given a smellyflower. Now i know you wanted to be a day vigilante but instead you became smellyflowerguy so trololol i'm a b-mod!"
-austin
Lol something related to that is probably going to happen now
|
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
where's this going, austin?
|
|
|
|