|
I'm surprised Plutarch wants to lynch Slam, but I happen to agree so...
Slam is still not talking sense. It looks to me that he's scaled back the persona just enough to give him a fighting chance of wifoming his eminent demise.
I wanted to find someone better to lynch and I wanted Slam to step up, but neither of these things have happened and I am not unhappy with this direction for day one. I was posturing with my pressure vote, but this doesn't rule out me actually voting him.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Ok, slam, you want to lynch spag and get us to consolidate onto him. So, give us reasons. Outline WHY we should lynch him over everyone else? Has he broken rules, has he participated in scum motives? Why not purple/bum(who you think is town?)/X?
|
Slam if you make a decent case on me I'll reconsider lynching you
|
I find the last pages pretty unconstructive..
Spaghetticus, this has now been asked many times. Who are your scumreads? Last day you managed to not catch up while you were doing it, instead you made ~60 posts that said just about nothing. Now it's time to start giving out reads. If you say you don't have any, i won't believe you, because while you were not comfortable with any scumreads in LXIII at this point, you still had this to say: + Show Spoiler +On November 16 2013 03:50 Spaghetticus wrote: I started this a little after Artanis' prodding, it's taken me awhile.
I’m going to have to read through again soon, as not everything is sticking with me. It’s currently 5am and I’ve had four hours sleep in the last 48 hours. I’m also having difficulty catching up on some of the terminology, though I’m gradually cluing in. I’ll just splurge out my impressions. I won’t make any formal cases just yet, I want to put my thoughts on paper then attend to them once I’m rested. Apologies in advance for poor formatting.
I’m comfortable with confirming Yamato town. This may seem redundant since that’s the general consensus, but I’m very stringent so this is actually a pretty big step.
On my next readthrough I’ll be fine tooth combing for Mocsta and VE. I’ve got precious history with Mocsta, but he’s also quite active. I want to confirm him town if possible. VE seems like the next most obvious, given the amount of material he has provided. I don’t like some of VE’s towncalls, but I think they’ve already been covered by others.
LoneMeow masoning incident: I find this unsuspicious. I’m probably more interested in those who tried to force this to be an issue.
Artanis and SS: SS seems dense. The projected paradigm within which he claims to view the world where everyone’s decision making is based entirely on the single factor of whether or not victory is achieved, is silly.
Does he seriously expect people to sit through a month of his needless abuse in order to slightly increase their chances of winning a prizeless endeavour?
Does he seriously think that by espousing his (so far generally unimpressive) logic to the exclusion of compromise in the pursuit of cooperation, he will achieve his intended position of mayor?
I understand that some people have difficulty getting along with others, but it seems to me a cover. I’d like to hear people’s thoughts on his meta. For someone who proclaims his own competency as a vet at the beginning of the thread, this incompetency is not consistent from my (admittedly limited) perspective. It could very easily be used to obscure scummy motives.
Admittedly, there have also been town tells. I've mixed feelings here.
Grack: The trolling seems a poor move. BC is hammering him, and IMO rightly so. Grack has fluffed, and Grack has not done much else. I can only think that: - Grack does not care (useless town) - Grack is in some way trying to modify his meta (unlikely) - Grack is trying to scumbait (somewhat more likely) - Grack is scum (most likely) The Kush4prez line was possibly scumbait, but honestly I don’t see how a town Grack was planning on taking that bait (if successful) and then convincing town of his plan post hoc. The inevitable arse biting his actions have reaped was entirely foreseeable. It’s difficult to see him as town, as his actions have caused little but discord.
Yamato lynching BC: I’m not sure, but did I miss the case? I see BC as good, I don’t want him to be scum. I’m not sure why that makes us need to lynch him without further information, as so far he’s been valuable. Unless I’m missing something, Mocsta was right to demand more reasoning for yamato’s platform based on BC. That said, Mocsta’s reasoning about cost/benefit for lynching BC confused me. If it’s what I think it is, it’s suspiciously dull. Sharrant: I’m not entirely certain how this became a thing, I’ll look into it in my next read. There didn't seem enough information at the time to make reads, that it was mentioned so many times sort of makes me think of artificial intervention.
Kushmasta: His propensity for unpredictable play makes him unsuitable for mayor. Everyone knows this, though I think some take it too far. Policy lynching him seems both poor play and in poor taste. Using him as a vehicle for lynchbait/trolling is also pretty shit. I think people attempting to bring Kush into the spotlight are hard pressed to provide a believable town motive. Other than that, there are a lot of people that are sliding around on my scale, but also a lot of undercommitment in posts. If you have a read, please don’t just state your conclusion, as it only begs the question, and junks up the thread with people demanding that you elaborate. You may feel like you’re getting straight to the point #lessismore #quietconfidence but the end result is a less cohesive discussion, and a less effective town.
Alakaslam do you understand people do not want to decipher your posts? I have no clue what you are talking about besides you seem to be thinking me and Spaghetticus are same alignment? Why is that? Why can't you just write your thoughts instead of making them an unreadable code? That does not help anyone because unless you have something to say that only one of the people should hear that's not productive, and at this point of the game you can't possibly have something that only one person needs to hear. We need to all hear and understand what you are thinking, and tbh i am willing to lynch you if what you are doing now does not stop. It does not help. It's not also people's job to ask you about your thoughts. It's your job to make yourself heard and offer opinions that help us lynching mafia. You can't just behind "but noone talked with me". If that's so, make people talk to you. Offer them something to talk about. Who should we lynch in your opinion? Why?
bumatlarge i am a bit puzzled, why exactly do you want to lynch Pandain and do you think he is the best lynch today? I'll ask straight up here, are you even trying to find mafia? It does not really look like it atm.
Pandain why exactly did you oppose the policy lynch idea so hard? I think you are good enough to know that even if Slam is town and he continues doing what he does he's never an asset to the town. He'll not be listened to, he is a lynchbait later on unless you want to decide that he is town now (which is stupid in the first place) and he is less likely to make right decisions in his voting because he does not let his train of thought to be know for other people -> does not get feedback regarding it. So all in all he is a random vote and a really likely mislynch in a situation town might not have mislynch. How do you justify lynching / not lynching him then? Also do you have anything else to say than opposing the policy lynch and accusing bumatlarge for his vote? yes it's bad - does it make him mafia? Why will mafia bumatlarge say "Spaghetticus is mafia, i will vote for Pandain"? Do you think he is some random noob that contradicts himself every sentence he writes? Other than that i agree with you, bumatlarge has not really been helping.
Plutarch you here? Or anyone?
|
Vote Count
ALAKASLAM (5): VayneAuthority, Spaghetticus, Grackaroni, Plutarch, Holyflare
GRACKARONI (2): Raynpelikoneet, Sidesprang
XATALOS (2): ArtanisXp, Corazon
VAYNEAUTHORITY (2): Kushm4sta, Xigxag
BUMATLARGE (1): Pandain
SIDESPRANG (1): LSB
PURPLETRATOR (1): Xatalos
SPAGHETTICUS (1): Alakaslam
NOT VOTING : JarJarDrinks, Bumatlarge, Purpletrator
Currently Alakaslam is set to be lynched.
Let me know if I missed anyone!
Deadline is in
|
Alakaslam would be a better Vigi shot, since (almost) everyone seems to agree that he's detrimental. The voting patterns wouldn't really tell that much of anyone's alignment, at least compared to players who have reasons not to be lynched (besides a statistical chance of flipping town). It's better to lynch players who have a higher chance of flipping scum and whose flip will give good insights into the voters. One mistake we made in GoT Mafia was to focus too much on lurkers/anti-town players, and it ended badly.
On December 11 2013 16:01 Grackaroni wrote: I'm not really buying Bum's story. If he wants to disregard day1 reads because they are weak and just lynch the most useless player that is his opinion. But if he's against lynching alakaslam, who openly states he will not be useful, just because he addresses his posts to Rayn then we have a problem. It really can't be argued that slam will be more useful than Pandain.
I like this post. Bum's main reason for voting Pandain was because he hadn't posted yet. Now Pandain has posted quite a bit, but bum just keeps going for him regardless of that. It doesn't really look like bum tries to figure out Pandain's alignment, he just chose a target and keeps going for it. That's not a town mindset. I want to hear from bum why Pandain is still a "good lynch" ASAP.
|
|
Yeah i agree with that Xatalos. ##unvote
|
On December 11 2013 19:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah i agree with that Xatalos. ##unvote
The risk is that the Vigi(s) will just shoot someone else and Alakaslam will live to LYLO. That wouldn't be a good situation, since it's clearly difficult to say anything about his alignment. And he's being harmful to the discussion...
But even so, I think he's such a likely Vigi shot that it's better to lynch someone else.
purpletrator hasn't still posted, and the pressure on him has died almost completely. Hopefully he comes back soon. It'd be sad if he was scum and slipped away by just lurking.
Hopefully bum has some explanations soon as well.
|
Slam starts contributing in English or we lynch him. purple starts contributing or we lynch him.
In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged. In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude.
|
On December 11 2013 20:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Slam starts contributing in English or we lynch him. purple starts contributing or we lynch him.
In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged. In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude.
I'd prefer lynching someone like Artanis or Corazon over Alakaslam.
Anti-town/lurker lynches tend to be just giant bandwagons where nobody learns anything. Even if the coin-flip is a success and he flips scum, it doesn't tell almost anything about the voters/non-voters. It's easy to vote for a player like that no matter what alignment the player or his voter is...
|
bum is also in that category unless he can explain why Pandain is scum really well.
|
alaka who is sucmmy and why plz
|
On December 11 2013 20:15 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 20:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Slam starts contributing in English or we lynch him. purple starts contributing or we lynch him.
In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged. In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude. I'd prefer lynching someone like Artanis or Corazon over Alakaslam. Anti-town/lurker lynches tend to be just giant bandwagons where nobody learns anything. Even if the coin-flip is a success and he flips scum, it doesn't tell almost anything about the voters/non-voters. It's easy to vote for a player like that no matter what alignment the player or his voter is... Well if you do not want them lynched better start telling them to contribute.
|
tbh i am getting sick of people who refuse to play the game they have joined in. If it takes me to lose 10 games where we policy lynch town lurkers / shitposters i don't care. Maybe they stop joining games then.
I woke up today and i read 10 pages of shit about policy lych / not policy lych and it made meangry because those posts could have been something uselful. It stops now.
|
tbh im getting sick of your bitching more than im sick of shitposters
|
By the way, I see Spaghetticus mentioned as a lynch candidate every once in a while. I don't really agree. Just look at these posts:
On December 10 2013 22:59 Spaghetticus wrote: @Kush
Could you give insight into why you think the following people are green: - Spaghetticus - Xatalos - Corazon - Purpletrator
I'm on the list because while I know my alignment, it seems fairly unanimous that I've done little to demonstrate it.
On December 11 2013 02:42 Spaghetticus wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 02:28 Xatalos wrote:Spag, have you catched up with the thread? What about those slight scumreads that you mentioned? By the way, this post made me think you're more likely town: On December 10 2013 22:59 Spaghetticus wrote: @Kush
Could you give insight into why you think the following people are green: - Spaghetticus - Xatalos - Corazon - Purpletrator
I'm on the list because while I know my alignment, it seems fairly unanimous that I've done little to demonstrate it. It just seems counter-intuitive to bring pressure on yourself like that for no real reason. They're just single digit contenders on my spreadsheet (on a scale from -100 being mafia, and 100 being town). I adjust scores accordingly after each incident I find interesting. It's more to keep track of my perspective over time, as I often forget the small stuff. It's really not worth talking about, and I don't want scum knowing my reads unless I'm acting on them. I appreciate the town read, though think it's something I'd do as scum too. No I haven't caught up with the thread. I'm still stuck on the same page. I think it's more important to attend to the here and now, and I'm losing focus again (tis 5am).
On December 11 2013 16:31 Spaghetticus wrote:Slam if you make a decent case on me I'll reconsider lynching you
They all just read to me as town. It's not impossible for this attitude to be a ploy, but the far more likely scenario is that Spag is just not afraid of suspicions at all. Which means town.
I also agree with this:
On December 11 2013 01:03 Spaghetticus wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 00:55 Corazon wrote: Plutarch is Marv because all Marv does is tunnel me whenever we are town together. You should just disregard everything he says about me tbh
HF is confirmation biased and refuses to push anyone else besides me. Play the game
Don't call Artanis scum for being right. Be less bad please. How do you expect to convince anyone with this garbage? So we should take you word for it that not only are you trustworthy, you are able to discern smurfs at a glance, and you deem that this smurf is marv, and you also deem that Marv tunnels you, that he does so unfairly, and we should therefore disregard it? How can you not see that this is too much to swallow? HF is biased because he thinks you're scummy and doesn't change his vote with the wind? Artanis can't be scum because you agree with him on something? You're either making terrible arguments because you're terrible town, or you're just bullshitting to look like you're doing something. Can someone weigh in on how good Corazon is supposed to be? If he's at all capable at mafia I want him hung.
The only worrying part is that there isn't much scumhunting in his filter. The previous post is probably the post closest to scumhunting, although it didn't come to any conclusion.
On December 11 2013 16:28 Spaghetticus wrote: I'm surprised Plutarch wants to lynch Slam, but I happen to agree so...
Slam is still not talking sense. It looks to me that he's scaled back the persona just enough to give him a fighting chance of wifoming his eminent demise.
I wanted to find someone better to lynch and I wanted Slam to step up, but neither of these things have happened and I am not unhappy with this direction for day one. I was posturing with my pressure vote, but this doesn't rule out me actually voting him.
Alakaslam isn't a terrible lynch, but it's definitely the easiest way out of D1. And it's a bit worrying that Spag's only committal to a lynch is someone like him.
Spag, if you're town, you need to step up your scumhunting. You mentioned that you had several slight scumreads, but you haven't shared any of them yet (except Corazon, I'd assume). Otherwise you're looking townish, but that's a worrying part about you.
|
There is no reason to personally insult anyone over a perfectly reasonable opinion.
|
On December 11 2013 20:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: tbh i am getting sick of people who refuse to play the game they have joined in. If it takes me to lose 10 games where we policy lynch town lurkers / shitposters i don't care. Maybe they stop joining games then.
I woke up today and i read 10 pages of shit about policy lych / not policy lych and it made meangry because those posts could have been something uselful. It stops now.
That's a noble attitude, but I prefer to focus only on the current game. And I don't want to lose now if it means (possibly) better games somewhere in the future.
|
Xatalos: Corazon is highly emotional player who contradicts himself as town, a lot. To me it seems like he's just pissed off for accusations against him because he finds them unreasonable. Stupid? Yes. Scummy? Not necessarily. He's far more reasonable and tries to control his emotions as scum. I don't see anything scummy in what he has said this game, mor likely it's just frustration. What you just quoted from Spaghetticus is attacking Cora for being emo. That's not scumhunting, that's an easy way to attack someone who says dumb stuff. The fact is Spag was here last night, he said he will catch up and share his thoughts. He ended up not catching up and and instead made 60 fluff posts about something irrelevant (defended himself against people who just wanted him to share his opinions). I find that highly suspicious.
|
|
|
|