|
On December 10 2013 15:49 Plutarch wrote: Basically there is no way you can have a town read on kush and have it be meaningful or based on solid analysis, or any analysis at all. Damn you are good. Keep postind
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
So, xigxag is there any reason your first entry into the game is used to justify a kush read?
Compare the quote you just linked:
On September 21 2013 12:39 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2013 12:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 21 2013 12:28 kushm4sta wrote: um by scumhunting as a team you mean having a conversation between the two of you that no one else wants to read? if so please dont Just make the meta case and stfu before you do so. how the fuck do i make a case on someone when it's like an hour into the game??
to this from this game:
On December 10 2013 08:29 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2013 08:19 Xatalos wrote:On December 10 2013 07:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 10 2013 07:18 Alakaslam wrote:On December 10 2013 07:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 10 2013 06:44 purpletrator wrote:On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote: ##Vote: purpletrator Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else. Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else. Smurfs = Mafia. Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs You could at least start in alphabetical order. What if I reveal my identity? Would you change your vote to a different smurf? Worst post in thread. ##Vote: purpletrator Kusplain? Hello sir, I promise not to get mad at you this game If purpletrator can reasonably explain what he is going to achieve with that post i'm going to unvote. Now i gotta sleep! cya tomorrow. Please don't be useless Alakaslam ok? By the way... rayn, what are you doing? I thought you were going to be one of the most contributive players here. I hope it'll get better from here... Otherwise you're probably scum. dude you need to chillax. it's like hours into the game.
Where is the difference apart from the complete lack of anything this game? He has like 4 posts and they all distinguish nada. It is impossible to get a "town read" on anyone with that lack of content so to enter the thread as that being the only information you bring to the table is something that is highly questionable. Now as someone who was scum and spammed and wrote things like that do you not think one would evolve scum play to avoid the things that people saw as questionable (in this case the spam from noir)?
I don't like how you have addressed Xatalos and cora - the main contention points in this thread as a side note, talking about vig's and telling him to cool down. Was there a reason you decided to do that rather than elaborate on things that have been said?
|
Basically what you are saying is that even though your reasoning is flawed and you cannot provide better reasoning, your reasoning for him being town is good. And my reasoning for him being null is bad. Yet you cannot state why other than mentioning some non-specific facts of the game.
I am more than aware of the differences in a scum and town mindset and I am telling you that there is no way you can tell. Do I think he is scum? I don't know. Do I think he is town? I don't know. And neither should you.
Further, I have played in many games with kush and I can tell you that he is more than capable of this style of play as both alignments.
What is odd though, is that you are defending a town read that is at best a large stretch to the hilt. And time and again people who provide town reads that I cant quite understand and who aren't able to provide solid reasons for those reads are scum.
This kush read is very scummy.
|
I think neither Corazon or Xatalos are good lynches. Which is why I mentioned neither of them.
Cor's first post was atrocious, you'll have no arguments from me on that front. His follow up as been too attention grabbing for me to desire to vote him on day one. He is worth pressuring though and I need to understand him more to get a real read on him which I would be willing to commit to.
Xatalos pooped on everyone in a dumb way early in the game. Alienating that many players as scum early on is unwise, he loses too much support for his lynch should he do that. It makes me uncomfortable to lynch him day one. I still need to know more of course but for now I find him non lynchable, Also there is a thing about him which suggests non-scum. I haven't decided if it suggests Sebastian the crab or town but it does suggest non-town.
As of this moment I have not yet found a player I am willing to lynch. You can tell by the way my vote has not yet fallen on anyone.
|
That was directed at xigxag
|
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
So, then what do you think on the points that I/LSB raised on sidesprang's introduction to the thread?
Also, just because they are not good lynches does not mean you can't elaborate on your reads on them, especially as they were both mentioned on your entry and are part of current events. You've given the information now so why was it that it needed to be dug for rather than your free kush town read and your need to look at alak more read?
|
Where you at right now Vayne? What do you think about the game.
|
Sidesprang is pretty scummy. Long posts with no content.
|
On December 10 2013 16:22 Plutarch wrote: Basically what you are saying is that even though your reasoning is flawed and you cannot provide better reasoning, your reasoning for him being town is good. And my reasoning for him being null is bad. Yet you cannot state why other than mentioning some non-specific facts of the game.
I am more than aware of the differences in a scum and town mindset and I am telling you that there is no way you can tell. Do I think he is scum? I don't know. Do I think he is town? I don't know. And neither should you.
Further, I have played in many games with kush and I can tell you that he is more than capable of this style of play as both alignments.
What is odd though, is that you are defending a town read that is at best a large stretch to the hilt. And time and again people who provide town reads that I cant quite understand and who aren't able to provide solid reasons for those reads are scum.
This kush read is very scummy.
It isn't but I don't really care, Kush is likely town and I'm not willing to lynch him day one. I'll reassess him day two when more content exists. For now he appears town to me.
LookOn December 10 2013 07:03 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2013 06:49 Xatalos wrote: Kushm4sta, by the way, I hope you're planning to play this game seriously. I've witnessed several games that you've partly ruined by lurking or worse.
If you're scum, you can get policy lynched. That's fine. Sorry but I'm doing a lurk strat this game! I disagree that it will ruin the game though.
I don't think this post is possible as a scum player. Kush brings out his lurking from the beginning and makes the rest of the thread aware that he is planning on lurking. This is not something that a scum wants. It draws unnecessary attention and weakens his thread position.
If you aren't interested in lynching Kush I have no interest in continuing this conversation. Since you are voting me I assume you have no intention of lynching Kush we can move on.
Can you explain to me why you shut down the case from Cor on Xatalos but did not provide a counter read. All you did was tear it down, why?
|
Don't really think much of anything right now, just memory banking everything for later and keeping an eye out for fake looking conversations. I always come back to day 1 later
|
On December 10 2013 16:29 Holyflare wrote: So, then what do you think on the points that I/LSB raised on sidesprang's introduction to the thread?
Also, just because they are not good lynches does not mean you can't elaborate on your reads on them, especially as they were both mentioned on your entry and are part of current events. You've given the information now so why was it that it needed to be dug for rather than your free kush town read and your need to look at alak more read?
I found them unimportant. Noting I had to say had been unsaid by the thread on the subjects of those two players. Things I had to say on Kush had been left unsaid.
|
I will say though that playing as scum last game you probably realize that Slam basically adds another scum to the game as either alignment. So I'm fine with lynching him regardless unless something very convincing goes down.
|
On December 10 2013 16:25 xigxag wrote: I think neither Corazon or Xatalos are good lynches. Which is why I mentioned neither of them.
Cor's first post was atrocious, you'll have no arguments from me on that front. His follow up as been too attention grabbing for me to desire to vote him on day one. He is worth pressuring though and I need to understand him more to get a real read on him which I would be willing to commit to.
Xatalos pooped on everyone in a dumb way early in the game. Alienating that many players as scum early on is unwise, he loses too much support for his lynch should he do that. It makes me uncomfortable to lynch him day one. I still need to know more of course but for now I find him non lynchable, Also there is a thing about him which suggests non-scum. I haven't decided if it suggests Sebastian the crab or town but it does suggest non-town.
As of this moment I have not yet found a player I am willing to lynch. You can tell by the way my vote has not yet fallen on anyone.
Basically XigXag is saying he doesn't think Xatalos or Cora are good lynches then goes on to agree that cora was scummy and list scummy things about both. But makes sure he doesn't commit to a read.
Oh and he doesn't know who he wants to lynch yet. Basically the scummiest most wishy-washy post in existence.
In fact the only non wishy-washy thing he has posted is an inexplicable town read on kush that he hard defends based off absolutely nothing. Which in itself is scummy.
Xigxag is scum.
|
On December 10 2013 16:33 VayneAuthority wrote: I will say though that playing as scum last game you probably realize that Slam basically adds another scum to the game as either alignment. So I'm fine with lynching him regardless unless something very convincing goes down.
Why do you prefer a policy lynch on Alakaslam over an attempt to lynch scum. What benefit do you see town gaining from this policy lynch over an honest attempt to find scum.
|
On December 10 2013 16:33 VayneAuthority wrote: I will say though that playing as scum last game you probably realize that Slam basically adds another scum to the game as either alignment. So I'm fine with lynching him regardless unless something very convincing goes down. haha I will agree with that. You can already see him planning for his late game martyr in his posts this game.
|
On December 10 2013 16:31 xigxag wrote: Can you explain to me why you shut down the case from Cor on Xatalos but did not provide a counter read. All you did was tear it down, why?
I don't like bad cases. Just because I tear down a bad case doesn't require me to replace it with something.
|
On December 10 2013 16:34 Plutarch wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2013 16:25 xigxag wrote: I think neither Corazon or Xatalos are good lynches. Which is why I mentioned neither of them.
Cor's first post was atrocious, you'll have no arguments from me on that front. His follow up as been too attention grabbing for me to desire to vote him on day one. He is worth pressuring though and I need to understand him more to get a real read on him which I would be willing to commit to.
Xatalos pooped on everyone in a dumb way early in the game. Alienating that many players as scum early on is unwise, he loses too much support for his lynch should he do that. It makes me uncomfortable to lynch him day one. I still need to know more of course but for now I find him non lynchable, Also there is a thing about him which suggests non-scum. I haven't decided if it suggests Sebastian the crab or town but it does suggest non-town.
As of this moment I have not yet found a player I am willing to lynch. You can tell by the way my vote has not yet fallen on anyone. Basically XigXag is saying he doesn't think Xatalos or Cora are good lynches then goes on to agree that cora was scummy and list scummy things about both. But makes sure he doesn't commit to a read. Oh and he doesn't know who he wants to lynch yet. Basically the scummiest most wishy-washy post in existence. In fact the only non wishy-washy thing he has posted is an inexplicable town read on kush that he hard defends based off absolutely nothing. Which in itself is scummy. Xigxag is scum.
yes, yes. Very nice. You don't like me. I get it.
Instead of being useless by attacking me why don't you answer the question I've asked you twice now, It matters to my read on you.
Along with that talk with me about Vayne. Vayne brought up Noir and when I looked at Noir and suggested that Kush was playing differently than he was there Vayne said to ignore Noir because of ## What has Vayne's goal been with his posting? To appear involved. Not to find scum.
|
On December 10 2013 16:34 xigxag wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2013 16:33 VayneAuthority wrote: I will say though that playing as scum last game you probably realize that Slam basically adds another scum to the game as either alignment. So I'm fine with lynching him regardless unless something very convincing goes down. Why do you prefer a policy lynch on Alakaslam over an attempt to lynch scum. What benefit do you see town gaining from this policy lynch over an honest attempt to find scum.
On December 10 2013 09:15 VayneAuthority wrote: I would rather enjoy myself and lose then not enjoy it, hence why I am voting you alakaslam, scum or not. I do not care about lynching scum if im not having fun in the first place, that comes first.
add in the fact that he goes out of his way to make it very difficult to win as town. A town alakaslam lynch is still a good lynch, I stand by that after last game
|
On December 10 2013 16:37 xigxag wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2013 16:34 Plutarch wrote:On December 10 2013 16:25 xigxag wrote: I think neither Corazon or Xatalos are good lynches. Which is why I mentioned neither of them.
Cor's first post was atrocious, you'll have no arguments from me on that front. His follow up as been too attention grabbing for me to desire to vote him on day one. He is worth pressuring though and I need to understand him more to get a real read on him which I would be willing to commit to.
Xatalos pooped on everyone in a dumb way early in the game. Alienating that many players as scum early on is unwise, he loses too much support for his lynch should he do that. It makes me uncomfortable to lynch him day one. I still need to know more of course but for now I find him non lynchable, Also there is a thing about him which suggests non-scum. I haven't decided if it suggests Sebastian the crab or town but it does suggest non-town.
As of this moment I have not yet found a player I am willing to lynch. You can tell by the way my vote has not yet fallen on anyone. Basically XigXag is saying he doesn't think Xatalos or Cora are good lynches then goes on to agree that cora was scummy and list scummy things about both. But makes sure he doesn't commit to a read. Oh and he doesn't know who he wants to lynch yet. Basically the scummiest most wishy-washy post in existence. In fact the only non wishy-washy thing he has posted is an inexplicable town read on kush that he hard defends based off absolutely nothing. Which in itself is scummy. Xigxag is scum. yes, yes. Very nice. You don't like me. I get it.
It's nothing personal. Just my job to find scum. And you happen to be scum.
|
|
|
|