EPTScum are mafia pretending to be someone else.
Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else.
Smurfs = Mafia.
Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs
II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else. Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else. Smurfs = Mafia. Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote: ##Vote: purpletrator Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else. Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else. Smurfs = Mafia. Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs Whose smurf is purpletrator? | ||
|
purpletrator
Vanuatu64 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote: ##Vote: purpletrator Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else. Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else. Smurfs = Mafia. Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs You could at least start in alphabetical order. What if I reveal my identity? Would you change your vote to a different smurf? | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:43 LSB wrote: ##Vote: purpletrator Scum are mafia pretending to be someone else. Smurfs are players pretending to be someone else. Smurfs = Mafia. Flawless mafia. Lynch all Smurfs That only accounts for 75% of the mafia. I expected better from you on the first hour of D1, LSB. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:31 Spaghetticus wrote: @Grackaroni and Holyflare You were red last game. You were victorious. Can we expect any changes in your play-style now that you are presumably town? Grack in particular, you trolled through the initial stages last time, are you gonna be more helpful this game? Don't think you'd see anything different most of my games are "pretty" similar. I guess there are wordings in my posts that you can pick up on sometimes when I'm scum, knowing more information than I should etc. Marv would be able to see afaik (if it is marv). ------------------------------------------------------------ What I don't like though is cora's different responses based on who pushed him see when Plutarch pushed cora, his response was: On December 10 2013 06:13 Corazon wrote: I sense the fact that you aren't reading my posts 100%. You've already gotten off to a rocky start with me due to your baseless accusation. Make sure it doesn't happen again. pretty aggressive - an omg you pointed something out and tried to generate discussion between players don't ever do that again. A hinderance to discussion, and an OMGUS post all within the first few posts. Not something I'd see usually, most people's normal reaction is "just thought people should know" not "shut up im watching you". Then couple it with when I pointed it out again: On December 10 2013 06:14 Corazon wrote: I appreciate getting asked the same question twice. Thanks. Off to work on English. Be back in an hour or so. Complete flip in responses and then a leave the thread, plenty of things to talk about or conclusions to draw early but he just disappears. + Show Spoiler + On November 20 2013 12:37 Corazon wrote: I took a shower. Sorry for not wanting to smell bad. Moc, I'm quite concerned that you have already used up >25% of your "self-allotted posts". If you're going to start spamming, it's going to be a problem. Now to my goals/early game statements: 1. I'm not gonna make any meta crap posts. TBH I don't remember anyone's meta and it's ridiculously stupid logic. I'm not going to stand for it and I don't think you guys should either. 2. I'm voting for the scummiest person. My last game was Titanic and it came down to 3-4 days of "X is scum, Y/Z/Q is scum as well". That led the town way off of the path and allowed my scum team the easiest scum win in a very long time. I don't care if they're not on the two lynch trains that are going to form. It's not instant majority so as long as I feel like I'm voting for the scummiest person in my opinion, I'm going to be happy with my vote. 3. I'm going to do my best to not be just an onlooker. I'm gonna try and facilitate discussion and ask a lot of questions instead of just answering questions and throw my ideas out there and just create more chaos. On that note, sciberia needs to stop analyzing the first page so hard and just discuss. We're not going to find scum on the first page. You guys just need to talk instead of being at each other's throats 30 minutes into the game. I don't like his responses or his auto peace out of thread, like the point that was brought up on him. ##Vote Corazon | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
If you're scum, you can get policy lynched. That's fine. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Do you guys really think I'm more scummy at this point than Spag and Slam? I'm being open and honest with all of you. I'm not hiding anything. I've always tried to be genuine and not put up façades or wear masks. I'm telling you that I was going to be busy and I told you how I felt coming into this game. If you guys want to call me scum for that, go ahead. But just know that it is really silly to call me scum when Slam and Spag made one post and peaced out. Spag had to be coerced back into the thread and Slam still hasn't come back. Plutarch wasn't trying to prod me for discussion; he was trying to twist my words and call me scum. Holyflare is just piggybacking off of everyone else's arguments to take town credit. If you guys would look into the game, you would see that I am far from the scummiest player here. Also, it is good to know that you are all down for pressure voting so now I don't have to take your votes seriously until very close to the deadline. Sweet. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:52 LSB wrote: Well that was some quick analysis. I can't tell if you are trying to flush out people who bandwagon easily or forcing things way to much If it was the first, why would you point it out? If it was the second, why would you point it out? | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
On July 27 2013 10:24 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: Alright men. I have successfully managed to get on board, and I have a feeling that the captain of this ship is a complete imbecile and needs to be replaced. Therefore, I plan to democratically elect myself to be captain. ##Captain: Captain Jack Sparrow I promise you that good things will happen if you all do this. What could go wrong? I'm Captain Jack Sparrow! On another note, lynching a lurker sounds like a great plan if we all want to get thrown off the boat. I don't want to get thrown off the boat, I'm a wanted man in the water, and it's always really cold, and there's no rum. But worse of all, there is no rum out in the middle of nowhere. So I think Oatsmaster has to try a bit harder to come up with a half-functioning plan. lynching lurkers was also the way he started titanic one, and he was scum there | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:47 Holyflare wrote: Don't think you'd see anything different most of my games are "pretty" similar. I guess there are wordings in my posts that you can pick up on sometimes when I'm scum, knowing more information than I should etc. Marv would be able to see afaik (if it is marv). ------------------------------------------------------------ What I don't like though is cora's different responses based on who pushed him see when Plutarch pushed cora, his response was: pretty aggressive - an omg you pointed something out and tried to generate discussion between players don't ever do that again. A hinderance to discussion, and an OMGUS post all within the first few posts. Not something I'd see usually, most people's normal reaction is "just thought people should know" not "shut up im watching you". Then couple it with when I pointed it out again: Complete flip in responses and then a leave the thread, plenty of things to talk about or conclusions to draw early but he just disappears. + Show Spoiler + On November 20 2013 12:37 Corazon wrote: I took a shower. Sorry for not wanting to smell bad. Moc, I'm quite concerned that you have already used up >25% of your "self-allotted posts". If you're going to start spamming, it's going to be a problem. Now to my goals/early game statements: 1. I'm not gonna make any meta crap posts. TBH I don't remember anyone's meta and it's ridiculously stupid logic. I'm not going to stand for it and I don't think you guys should either. 2. I'm voting for the scummiest person. My last game was Titanic and it came down to 3-4 days of "X is scum, Y/Z/Q is scum as well". That led the town way off of the path and allowed my scum team the easiest scum win in a very long time. I don't care if they're not on the two lynch trains that are going to form. It's not instant majority so as long as I feel like I'm voting for the scummiest person in my opinion, I'm going to be happy with my vote. 3. I'm going to do my best to not be just an onlooker. I'm gonna try and facilitate discussion and ask a lot of questions instead of just answering questions and throw my ideas out there and just create more chaos. On that note, sciberia needs to stop analyzing the first page so hard and just discuss. We're not going to find scum on the first page. You guys just need to talk instead of being at each other's throats 30 minutes into the game. I don't like his responses or his auto peace out of thread, like the point that was brought up on him. ##Vote Corazon Actually I think Corazon has a surprisingly good chance of flipping Mafia (considering it's this early). Slightly scummy opening post, slightly OMGUS response, apathetic tone in next post... Definitely not looking good. Has anyone played with him before though? How does this compare to his town/Mafia play? | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:54 VayneAuthority wrote: lynching lurkers was also the way he started titanic one, and he was scum there Yeah that was before lurkers ruined Basics | ||
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:25 Xatalos wrote: May I ask... Where did you disappear to? This is the kind of non-contribution that Mafia love to make. Especially combined with fading to the background right after that. I understand. If you are really suspicious, this came up. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=437953 I'm here now. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:55 Xatalos wrote: Actually I think Corazon has a surprisingly good chance of flipping Mafia (considering it's this early). Slightly scummy opening post, slightly OMGUS response, apathetic tone in next post... Definitely not looking good. Has anyone played with him before though? How does this compare to his town/Mafia play? Why do you need meta to make your read on me? My opening post was not scummy. My OMGUS wasn't an OMGUS. I'm going to call people out for not reading. That isn't scummy to you? Holyflare was just piggybacking off of Plutarch. I'm going to call people out for piggybacking. That isn't scummy to you? I hate to tell you that you are wrong but you are wrong. Sorry. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9673 Posts
On December 10 2013 06:53 Corazon wrote: Lol can I go one game without being the first one voted. Do you guys really think I'm more scummy at this point than Spag and Slam? I'm being open and honest with all of you. I'm not hiding anything. I've always tried to be genuine and not put up façades or wear masks. I'm telling you that I was going to be busy and I told you how I felt coming into this game. If you guys want to call me scum for that, go ahead. But just know that it is really silly to call me scum when Slam and Spag made one post and peaced out. Spag had to be coerced back into the thread and Slam still hasn't come back. Plutarch wasn't trying to prod me for discussion; he was trying to twist my words and call me scum. Holyflare is just piggybacking off of everyone else's arguments to take town credit. If you guys would look into the game, you would see that I am far from the scummiest player here. Also, it is good to know that you are all down for pressure voting so now I don't have to take your votes seriously until very close to the deadline. Sweet. Spagetticus and Alakaslam certainly didn't start in a townish way. But I have to ask which is worse: weak non-contribution (them) or passable non-contribution (you)? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
| ||
