my fling with WC3
Blogs > geometryb |
geometryb
United States1249 Posts
| ||
snes.tq
United States46 Posts
| ||
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
haha gets quite intense at times if you understand whats happening | ||
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
geometryb
United States1249 Posts
| ||
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
I'm sorry to hear you don't like War3 that much, but it's a different game. The style of play is not supposed to be the same as BW. But when you really see how the game's played (like you learn unit counters and BOs and stuff) you get to see some crazy shit people pull on each other (go on YouTube and see how Moon beat Zacard 3-0 :O mass Cyclone FTW; he had like literally no army and he won) And alffla's post about DotA is true; if you see higher-level games they get crazayyyy ^^ | ||
Wizard
Poland5055 Posts
| ||
Auspicious
United States175 Posts
On August 17 2007 03:16 Wizard[pl] wrote: The thing is DotA is pretty cool, but WC3 like you said is too centered around the heroes. In my opinion, it would be SO much more fun (I don't know if it's possible) if there was no creeping: level 1 heroes with a small army against another level 1 hero and a small army. The obvious problem is the balancing of the heroes...I think creeping slows the game down + I don't want to be fighting an AI, but the actual opponent, but oh well. -__- . . . . . . . .what do you play, DOTA with computers or something? | ||
Wizard
Poland5055 Posts
The thing is DotA is pretty cool, but WC3 like you said is too centered around the heroes. In my opinion, it would be SO.... As you can see I mentioned DotA at the beginning, and THEN, I started talking about WC3 for the rest of the post | ||
Auspicious
United States175 Posts
On August 17 2007 03:49 Wizard[pl] wrote: This is the third thread in which you have misread my post. -_-;;; I was talking about WC3, see:: As you can see I mentioned DotA at the beginning, and THEN, I started talking about WC3 for the rest of the post I didn't misread your post, you weren't clear. | ||
Wizard
Poland5055 Posts
| ||
rpf
United States2705 Posts
| ||
Aepplet
Sweden2908 Posts
| ||
snes.tq
United States46 Posts
On August 17 2007 05:10 Auspicious wrote: I didn't misread your post, you weren't clear. All he saw was DOTA lol | ||
useLess
United States4781 Posts
| ||
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
| ||
CustomXSpunjah
United States1093 Posts
On August 17 2007 06:13 Aepplet wrote: i'd say wc3 suffers more from being imbalanced than boring. yep. at gosugamers nobody ever bets on the humans (i think thats the race that sucks) just because you start off at a huge ass disadvantage | ||
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
On August 17 2007 11:39 CustomXSpunjah wrote: yep. at gosugamers nobody ever bets on the humans (i think thats the race that sucks) just because you start off at a huge ass disadvantage Not really ... HU allows for the easiest FE; just grab 5 Peasants, 3 Footmen, and an Archmage with WE and just creep your nearest empty gold mine; then build a Town Hall with 5 guys and turtle with your army until you get like 30,000 Towers in there and then go Rifle+Caster or something and pwn everything -__- | ||
Falcynn
United States3597 Posts
| ||
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
On August 17 2007 12:46 Equinox_kr wrote: Not really ... HU allows for the easiest FE; just grab 5 Peasants, 3 Footmen, and an Archmage with WE and just creep your nearest empty gold mine; then build a Town Hall with 5 guys and turtle with your army until you get like 30,000 Towers in there and then go Rifle+Caster or something and pwn everything -__- Undead is the weakest race... lol that DotA song and all of basshunter's songs are catchy. | ||
| ||