[WCS EU] Ro16 Group A Premier Season 3 2013 - Page 64

Post a Reply

Prev 1 62 63 64

lichter

1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts

September 25 2013 04:46 GMT

#1261

On September 25 2013 13:41 Zerg.Zilla wrote:

Show nested quote +

That's a good question,i wanna see Happy - Stardust game 3 again and again and again...

I need it to make the recap =/

NovemberstOrm

Canada16217 Posts

September 25 2013 04:49 GMT

#1262

On September 25 2013 13:46 lichter wrote:

Show nested quote +

I need it to make the recap =/

they have two series up but not the one you want.

lichter

1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts

September 25 2013 04:52 GMT

#1263

On September 25 2013 13:49 NovemberstOrm wrote:

Show nested quote +

they have two series up but not the one you want.

Yeah already saw the initial matches. I wonder if they forgot it, since this is the first time it has taken this long

RiZu

Singapore5715 Posts

September 25 2013 06:59 GMT

#1264

fck yea Targa! I knew he will make it!

NoGasfOu

United States1117 Posts

September 25 2013 07:41 GMT

#1265

Looks like Stardust has outclassed the group again as expected.

Doublemint

Austria8366 Posts

September 25 2013 07:57 GMT

#1266

On September 25 2013 16:41 NoGasfOu wrote:
Looks like Stardust has outclassed the group again as expected.

Outclassed is quite a strong word, considering the fact that he went 0:2 in his first BO3 (yes PvP, but still).

However, I too think that he was one of the strongest players in this group and in hindsight and light of how dramatic the PvT between him and happy was WE should be happy it went that way

Sissors

1395 Posts

September 25 2013 07:58 GMT

#1267

On September 25 2013 16:41 NoGasfOu wrote:
Looks like Stardust has outclassed the group again as expected.

With the smallest differences he barely managed to get second place.

Conclusion: he outclassed the group...

TheBloodyDwarf

Finland7524 Posts

September 25 2013 08:18 GMT

#1268

On September 25 2013 16:41 NoGasfOu wrote:
Looks like Stardust has outclassed the group again as expected.

StarDust got destroyed so badly in first set that nobody can belive you..

TheBloodyDwarf

Finland7524 Posts

September 25 2013 08:21 GMT

#1269

On September 25 2013 07:39 sharkie wrote:

Show nested quote +

On September 25 2013 07:35 Dodgin wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:32 Fanatic-Templar wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:28 Dodgin wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:21 Sissors wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:18 Dodgin wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:14 Sissors wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:10 Dodgin wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:09 Sissors wrote:

On September 25 2013 07:07 Dodgin wrote:
[quote]

I'M PRETTY SURE

if you won the game

you outplayed your opponent

pretty sure

I mean I could be wrong

Yeah better bet on that last one. With outplaying your opponent not the same as winning is meant. So yeah...

But if you won the game you played better than your opponent did, isn't that what outplaying is?

By outplaying generally it is meant that one player (generally the winner) showed clearly across the board better play.

For example if you have a very close TvP, and the toss manages to sneak in two HTs with a flank and storms the entire Terran army, then that was clearly a good move by the protoss, but he didn't outplay the terran. Build order wins are also not outplaying. Outplaying is more like whatever you do, your opponent is doing it better.

this is just semantics, because it's a video game and there are things that are strong and can quickly turn a game around you will have these moments where one player messes up and the other takes advantage like with the storm example. Even if It's just for a moment it is playing better than your opponent because if your opponent was playing better they wouldn't have let it happen.

outplaying in your definition can't exist in this game unless two players of the same race do mirror builds

ZvT example:
You try to drop, he intercepts pretty much every drop. You attack, he flanks you. You try to deny one of his bases, you fail. Then you are being outplayed (assuming the zerg doesn't screw up his macro behind that). Really this isn't rocket science. And it is not my definition, it is the general definition used by everyone who doesn't randomly use the word...

no It's just your subjective bias as to what constitutes as " outplaying "

Objectively, you would agree that Stardust tied for worst player in the group in a bo3?

objectively I would say stardust was the player with the 2nd best win/loss record in the group so he advanced in second place.

targa 4-1
stardust 4-3
welmu 3-4
happy 1-4

and if welmu had won one game it would have been...

Stardust 4-4
welmu 4-4

If welmu would had won one more map he would have been 4 - 0 :D

virpi

Germany3598 Posts

September 25 2013 09:00 GMT

#1270

how did happy manage to lose on belshir? he had some flying buildings and stardust had nothing but a ground army when I turned off yesterday.

NovaMB

Germany9534 Posts

September 25 2013 09:28 GMT

#1271

On September 25 2013 18:00 virpi wrote:
how did happy manage to lose on belshir? he had some flying buildings and stardust had nothing but a ground army when I turned off yesterday.

It was a draw and he lost the rematch