|
On January 05 2013 00:54 Lazermonkey wrote: thrawn, your case is just sooo bad. I don't know what to say even. Like you point out several things but HOW do them make me scummy? Like all your points are based on very extreme WIFOM.
I never said my vote is useless. It is however not very usefull when it's 45 hours untill lynch and I'm the only one that's voting the person.
the phrasing thing is not a proof of anything really.
Firstly, how was my push against Tunkeg OMGUS? You then say that it is scummy that I first tell everyone that I'm going to check Tunkeg's meta before doing it. Well, it isn't.
My grush/kush policy thing was hardly serious.
You say I'm trying to bandwagon but that's also massive WIFOM. Maybe I'm just town who reconsider.
|
On January 05 2013 00:56 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 00:52 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 05 2013 00:42 Hopeless1der wrote:On January 05 2013 00:41 thrawn2112 wrote: well i don't want to lynch either you or palmar How do you feel about cc's promised, yet undelivered, reads On January 04 2013 08:24 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 04 2013 08:23 iamperfection wrote:On January 04 2013 08:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On January 04 2013 08:20 debears wrote:On January 04 2013 08:18 iamperfection wrote: you should join the wagon of justice as well debars Can we please keep CC around til at least day 2? I love the kid. He's so funny Nope. All serious biz this game. Lynch me Dibbers c'mon. hey you haven't tried to hunt scum at all. What have you to say to this accusation? It's not an accusation - it's truth. Truth for half the players too. Don't worry I'll be cooking up something later tonight after work. don;t remember who it was but somebody pointed out the difference between scum cc and town cc, scum cc posts are much better quality. in witchcraft i thought cc was 100% scum because of how trollish/annoying/illogical his posts were and he ended up flipping town. if the point of lynching cc is to lynch a lurker i'd prefer selecting from people with lower content uhh, unless there was more, I remember it was kush, and thinking 'godamnit' to myself: Show nested quote +On January 04 2013 13:46 kushm4sta wrote: town cheesecake seems more trolly. "Cool story" etc scum cheesecake makes cleaner posts. So for meta reasons with 2 games experience.
so... you disagree with those reasons?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
iamp, you make me very very sad indeed.
|
As hard as I try, I have no idea what the hell we're talking about anymore.
Ima go read Adam's filter because for some reason he has been flying under my radar. Then I will have to go back to class because astronomy is my only free period
|
On January 05 2013 00:57 Lazermonkey wrote: Agree with kush/thrawn on the CC. He can just as well be a lazy townie.
are you not suspicious of me for this "bad case" I made against you?
|
On January 05 2013 00:58 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 00:54 Lazermonkey wrote: thrawn, your case is just sooo bad. I don't know what to say even. Like you point out several things but HOW do them make me scummy? Like all your points are based on very extreme WIFOM.
I never said my vote is useless. It is however not very usefull when it's 45 hours untill lynch and I'm the only one that's voting the person.
the phrasing thing is not a proof of anything really.
Firstly, how was my push against Tunkeg OMGUS? You then say that it is scummy that I first tell everyone that I'm going to check Tunkeg's meta before doing it. Well, it isn't.
My grush/kush policy thing was hardly serious.
You say I'm trying to bandwagon but that's also massive WIFOM. Maybe I'm just town who reconsider. Shit, you found me...
|
On January 05 2013 00:59 marvellosity wrote: iamp, you make me very very sad indeed. you said it yourself me and palmar are likely town palmar feels strong about this case it must be done
|
On January 05 2013 00:59 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 00:57 Lazermonkey wrote: Agree with kush/thrawn on the CC. He can just as well be a lazy townie. are you not suspicious of me for this "bad case" I made against you? Not really. I think generally townies are more capable of pushing retarded cases than scum is. You can be scum tho. But I don't really care, it's not like town and scum MUST disagree on everything. I agree with you on this point.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 01:01 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 00:59 marvellosity wrote: iamp, you make me very very sad indeed. you said it yourself me and palmar are likely town palmar feels strong about this case it must be done
no, it mustn't. you've disappointed me.
|
On January 05 2013 01:01 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 00:59 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 05 2013 00:57 Lazermonkey wrote: Agree with kush/thrawn on the CC. He can just as well be a lazy townie. are you not suspicious of me for this "bad case" I made against you? Not really. I think generally townies are more capable of pushing retarded cases than scum is. You can be scum tho. But I don't really care, it's not like town and scum MUST disagree on everything. I agree with you on this point.
Best post
|
On January 04 2013 10:31 marvellosity wrote: I'm still pretty happy with my vote on Palmar, for reasons already given. There's nothing in what Palmar has done so far that suggests in the slightest that he gives a shit for town, and he should be one of the town leaders.
I know another guy who should be a town leader ^^
|
Palmar, why are you just so different from the last two games you were in?
I second thrawns' thoughts about CC, and I agree with his arguments about LM except for the argument with the "looks bad"-phrasing. I'm not lynching Lazer based on some retarded phrasing-argument.
As a birthday present, I demand that we lynch VE, Kush or Lazermonkey.
Hopeless, I don't see what you see about that red highlighted stuff. You want to lynch Lazer or not?
@ Thrawn
I want to know why you said that town kush is easily identifiable in your post about LM. Do you think he is town in this game?How is he easily identifiable as town when he isn't as scum?
|
marv is palmar scum? you have never said you thought he was scum. You want to lynch him for annoying you?? esp with this mason claim that does not seem reasonable.
|
On January 05 2013 01:09 Vivax wrote: Palmar, why are you just so different from the last two games you were in?
Because I felt like being different?
|
On January 05 2013 01:10 kushm4sta wrote: marv is palmar scum? you have never said you thought he was scum. You want to lynch him for annoying you?? esp with this mason claim that does not seem reasonable. read the thread goddamnit.
|
On January 05 2013 01:09 Vivax wrote: Palmar, why are you just so different from the last two games you were in?
I second thrawns' thoughts about CC, and I agree with his arguments about LM except for the argument with the "looks bad"-phrasing. I'm not lynching Lazer based on some retarded phrasing-argument.
As a birthday present, I demand that we lynch VE, Kush or Lazermonkey.
Hopeless, I don't see what you see about that red highlighted stuff. You want to lynch Lazer or not?
@ Thrawn
I want to know why you said that town kush is easily identifiable in your post about LM. Do you think he is town in this game?How is he easily identifiable as town when he isn't as scum? Sorry to make you dissapointed then. We aren't lynching any of these players.
|
On January 05 2013 01:09 Vivax wrote: Palmar, why are you just so different from the last two games you were in?
I second thrawns' thoughts about CC, and I agree with his arguments about LM except for the argument with the "looks bad"-phrasing. I'm not lynching Lazer based on some retarded phrasing-argument.
As a birthday present, I demand that we lynch VE, Kush or Lazermonkey.
Hopeless, I don't see what you see about that red highlighted stuff. You want to lynch Lazer or not?
@ Thrawn
I want to know why you said that town kush is easily identifiable in your post about LM. Do you think he is town in this game?How is he easily identifiable as town when he isn't as scum? Don't want to lynch lazer yet, but he discredits thrawn by saying the "mafia motive" part of the case is missing, then goes on to address the "mafia motive" in the case.
|
|
On January 05 2013 01:11 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 01:10 kushm4sta wrote: marv is palmar scum? you have never said you thought he was scum. You want to lynch him for annoying you?? esp with this mason claim that does not seem reasonable. read the thread goddamnit. i did
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 01:10 kushm4sta wrote: marv is palmar scum? you have never said you thought he was scum. You want to lynch him for annoying you?? esp with this mason claim that does not seem reasonable.
why don't you fucking read my filter? I've unvoted Palmar and said he was probably town.
|
|
|
|