EPT[Code A] RO24 Day 3 2012 GSL Season 5 - Page 63
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Starting page 57, any tangent that can be construed as SC2 vs BW will be bannable | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:29 KristofferAG wrote: So, I managed to saw down two christmas trees in the forest, walk them back to our cabin, shovel all the snow down to the beach and all the snow on our terrace, and GSL is not over. Judging from Khaldor, these previous two sets were awesome? Weird games. Definitely not standard. So yes, they were entertaining | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:29 KristofferAG wrote: So, I managed to saw down two christmas trees in the forest, walk them back to our cabin, shovel all the snow down to the beach and all the snow on our terrace, and GSL is not over. Judging from Khaldor, these previous two sets were awesome? How long is your beard? | ||
|
sitromit
7051 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:26 Azzur wrote: I consider Curious a patchzerg and his patchzerg skills were showing in that game he should've easily won So now Curious, the only player to win Code A without dropping a single map when it was still its own tournament, is a patchzerg? OK... | ||
|
WhX
Germany778 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:26 Azzur wrote: I consider Curious a patchzerg and his patchzerg skills were showing in that game he should've easily won I lol'ed. Hope you're joking about this | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:27 Shellshock1122 wrote: GSL S5 Code A Ro24  Genius vs  CuriousGame 3 Map: Cloud Kingdom 0:00 Genius spawns in the bottom left Curious spawns in the top right2:00 pool first for Curious forge first for Genius pylon block at the natural of Curious 3:00 pylon canceled nexus for Genius hatch for Curious cannon for Genius Gateway for Genius 4:00 3rd for Curious double gas for Genius Cybernetics core for Genius 5:00 zealot for Genius sentry for Genius Stargate for Genius double gas for Curious | ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:29 KristofferAG wrote: So, I managed to saw down two christmas trees in the forest, walk them back to our cabin, shovel all the snow down to the beach and all the snow on our terrace, and GSL is not over. Judging from Khaldor, these previous two sets were awesome? Yeah your run-of-the-mill Genius GSL games. Something happens, followed up by something half-assed, followed up by something awesome, followed up by something strange and unexpected into GG. | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:29 shabby wrote: Every player has their one run. Its just variance. I was agreeing with you about him not being a patchzerg | ||
Olli
Austria24416 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:30 sitromit wrote: So now Curious, the only player to win Code A without dropping a single map when it was still its own tournament, is a patchzerg? OK... Everybody is a patchzerg. I'm a patchzerg too, my PvT got a lot better after the queen buff. | ||
KristofferAG
Norway25712 Posts
Average Norwegian length. Meaning, it covers my nipples. | ||
|
Prevolved
United States573 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:31 shabby wrote: Yeah your run-of-the-mill Genius GSL games. Something happens, followed up by something half-assed, followed up by something awesome, followed up by something strange and unexpected into GG. ROFL, so damn true | ||
|
Grovbolle
Denmark3804 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:30 bo1b wrote: How many seasons in a row has curious been in code s? 6 http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/GOMTV_Global_StarCraft_II_League/Code_S_Streaks | ||
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:31 Shellshock1122 wrote: I was agreeing with you about him not being a patchzerg Aight, couldn't remember when the patch came out, people have been whining about zergs for so long the GSL seasons are a blur. | ||
|
BackSideAttack
1103 Posts
mkp has superb micro but awful multtasking. If you watched some of his GSL games, in particular the ones where he tried to do a hellion drop in the main followed by a bio attack at the natural against a zerg opponent, people were bming him on his poor control and how he shouldn't try to multitask his micro so much. Mvp's micro is definitely not as good as fantasy's despite being quite good. Go find me a game where mvp does all the things fantasy did in his games against roro. Mvp's mech heavy playstyle is much easier to multitask with than fantasy's bio heavy playstyle. When zerg counter-attacks its much easier to defend with stationary defenses than bio. If you watch his games in GSL against leenock, he lost because his bio play couldn't stand up to leenock's heavy counter-attack play. Simply he couldn't multitask and micro well enough. Gumiho has really subpar micro but great multitasking. He hits you everywhere at once but doesn't micro. Wolf mentions this in some of his gsl games Polt has awful multitasking. His macro isn't really even that much better than fantasy's especially considering he is doing less actions when not macroing. Polt is known not to be a very mechanical player, albeit he does have great control. He mostly wins by outsmarting his opponents MMA has great multitasking and good micro. However he rose to fame beating zergs who weren't particularly good at multitasking. Even DRG, who despite being great at multitasking, did not use it very much against terrans. The bottomline is, other than maybe MMA, non of the players you mentioned are better at BOTH multitasking and microing than fantasy. This is especially true when it comes to doing both at the same time. They mostly either do one of the other. Also take into consideration that fantasy is doing all this against roro, a player that is known for his multitasking. Obv he's going to look a lot sloppier when his opponent actually responds to his attacks appropriately. Even with his atrocious macro, he still came out ahead in most of the engagements in game 1 and 2 against Roro. That obviously means he controlled his army quite well, because he couldn't have had more units. | ||
|
KristofferAG
Norway25712 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:31 shabby wrote: Yeah your run-of-the-mill Genius GSL games. Something happens, followed up by something half-assed, followed up by something awesome, followed up by something strange and unexpected into GG. Sounds like a good game. I like somewhat sloppy games! | ||
|
Soyuz
Hong Kong996 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:33 BackSideAttack wrote: mkp has superb micro but awful multtasking. If you watched some of his GSL games, in particular the ones where he tried to do a hellion drop in the main followed by a bio attack at the natural against a zerg opponent, people were bming him on his poor control and how he shouldn't try to multitask his micro so much. Mvp's micro is definitely not as good as fantasy's despite being quite good. Go find me a game where mvp does all the things fantasy did in his games against roro. Mvp's mech heavy playstyle is much easier to multitask with than fantasy's bio heavy playstyle. When zerg counter-attacks its much easier to defend with stationary defenses than bio. If you watch his games in GSL against leenock, he lost because his bio play couldn't stand up to leenock's heavy counter-attack play. Simply he couldn't multitask and micro well enough. Gumiho has really subpar micro but great multitasking. He hits you everywhere at once but doesn't micro. Wolf mentions this in some of his gsl games Polt has awful multitasking. His macro isn't really even that much better than fantasy's especially considering he is doing less actions when not macroing. Polt is known not to be a very mechanical player, albeit he does have great control. He mostly wins by outsmarting his opponents MMA has great multitasking and good micro. However he rose to fame beating zergs who weren't particularly good at multitasking. Even DRG, who despite being great at multitasking, did not use it very much against terrans. The bottomline is, other than maybe MMA, non of the players you mentioned are better at BOTH multitasking and microing than fantasy. This is especially true when it comes to doing both at the same time. They mostly either do one of the other. Also take into consideration that fantasy is doing all this against roro, a player that is known for his multitasking. Obv he's going to look a lot sloppier when his opponent actually responds to his attacks appropriately. Even with his atrocious macro, he still came out ahead in most of the engagements in game 1 and 2 against Roro. That obviously means he controlled his army quite well, because he couldn't have had more units. It's way past page 57 | ||
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:33 KristofferAG wrote: Sounds like a good game. I like somewhat sloppy games! You'll enjoy the VODs from this series, I think. Just don't watch fantasy roro. | ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7967 Posts
| ||
|
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On December 14 2012 21:31 Shellshock1122 wrote: 2:00 pool first for Curious forge first for Genius pylon block at the natural of Curious 3:00 pylon canceled nexus for Genius hatch for Curious cannon for Genius Gateway for Genius 4:00 3rd for Curious double gas for Genius Cybernetics core for Genius 5:00 zealot for Genius sentry for Genius Stargate for Genius double gas for Curious 6:00 and 7:00 phoenixes for Genius +1 attack for Genius roach warren for Curious evo chamber for Curious Lair for Curious 3 more gates for Genius 2 more gas for Curious ling speed for Curious 8:00 macro hatch for Curious Genius hiding his phoenixes until the 4th comes out Robo for Genius +1 range attack started for Curious roach speed started for Curious 9:00 Genius sees roaches moving across the map so he sends his phoenixes home spores started for Curious +1 armor started for Genius 3rd base started for Genius 10:00 Robotics bay started for Geinus extra queens coming out for Curious to defend against phoenixes twilight council started for Genius queen picked off by the phoenixes +1 melee started for Curious | ||
| ||
