Go away.
Liquid City Mafia - Page 55
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
Go away. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On October 04 2012 09:04 kushm4sta wrote: Yes but marv switching from 1 townie to another is different from switching from 1 townie to a scum. I agree with this. Switching between two townies gets you the possibility of one townie killed now, and another one in the future. It leaves an air of uncertainty around the remaining townie that sticks throughout the game. Our present uncertainty (for those who are still uncertain about Node's alignment) indicates this. A switch from townie to scum is different. If most of the scum team saw Node as someone who they could bus for towncred without losing a valuable asset, then they might go for it. I, personally, don't feel that he's a major loss, so I could see it as a possibility that they were bussing him. If it were someone other than Node, I would be less inclined to believe so, but there it is. For a more firm personal stance on Node: I would be willing to vote for him in the future. I can see his posts being at least slightly scummy, and despite my view of his meta, everyone is right in saying that he has done nothing to show that he's town. If he comes back with some solid contributions, I'll rethink it, but at the moment I'd be up for a Node lynch (you know, after the far more secure lynch today XD). I'm heading out for some fun times now. I'll probably be back in a few hours. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 01 2012 12:42 Z-BosoN wrote: + Show Spoiler + One more thing that I don't like is VisceraEyes's case history. Spends a billion posts tunneling annul, based on a "trying to spot clues" (?) read. Then suddenly feels that his emotions got the better of him, and reconsiders. Which is funny, because VE started the attacks. It's not like he was attacked and got emotinal. -snip- At this point I'm null - I got a false read on him early on, and while I think his anger at me seems a little contrived, I know I've overreacted once or twice to people calling my posts stupid or something. Once that I remember for sure. Maybe twice. I've seen him play scum. He's pretty terrifying and that may have biased my read earlier. Then in this post: On October 01 2012 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote: @slOosh Shady is an intelligent guy. Poor play isn't something I'd use to write Shady off. I mean, he's not super awesome like me, but he's good enough to know that what he's doing is newb shit which means it has to be intentional. And while it's possible that he's being straight up with the whole "Oh you know, I wanted to martyr myself to the mod as an example", I tend to think that he's just trying get out of hot water before he's in it, so to speak...which is a scum trait. In fact, ##Vote: ShadySands Going MIA after making shitty accusations and troll entrance is like...strike three for me. @Everyone else I find nothing scummy about KJ's input on scumhunting in an inactivish environment. If that's all he's got, then we'll talk. As it stands though, that one singular post is better than the several who haven't posted at all. That being said, the whole "seemed contrived/was contrived" nonsense does need clarification. @KJ "...seemed contrived" is the same thing as "was contrived" in the context of analyzing behavior. If you're town, then if something "seems contrived" then that's suspicious because townies have no reason to fake it. Saying something that X said "seems contrived" means the same thing as "It looks to me like X is faking his reaction" - do you not understand how someone would get defensive about that? And then trying to paint it scummy (Y U DEFENSIVE) on top of that makes it seem like you're trying to set him up. Ultimately, you're after meaningful contribution and you have provided none. There's stuff going on in the game worth commenting on, and presently you're not. I'm willing to lynch into ShadySands, kingjames01 as it stands. We really need more content from everyone though. He finally addresses shady sands and proposes to vote on him. Now look at how he addresses kingjames. In this same post, he goes from a "not a scum read", to a "someone I want dead". At first I thought it was understandable because he was referring specifically to KJ's input on scumhunting in an inactivish environment. However, it's the bolded underlined part that gets to me. What I understood here is that if KJ only had the one post, he would be better than those who haven't posted at all. But then he goes to say that KJ is not commenting on stuff going on in the game (when, ironically, he himself had only just addressed shady sands, which is the first big issue) plus a bunch of other confusing stuff I don't follow, thus putting KJ as a bigger scum read than the rest. I'd like him to clarify this. This concludes the people I don't like so far. Out of those, VE seems the scummiest to me, because his play doesn't make sense for me from a town perspective, his conflict with annul seemed too fake. ##FOS VE On October 02 2012 01:13 talismania wrote: + Show Spoiler + so apparently this started I'm caught up to about halfway through pg 11 at the moment so forgive me if someone has already said this: VE is scum basically he has a cold hard activity tell on him that I don't think he's shook yet. see this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668¤tpage=73#1442 If I have time I'll make a pretty graph later. And he's made 11 posts in 24 hours in this game, right on target with his scum pace. His posts are qualitatively similar as well - they all tend to be of medium length with few of the quick one-off responses and conversational feel that his town play has. combine this with the fact that he's doing a couple of things similar to what he did in mad men: --Being a little inflammatory. He accidentally riled up annul, calling him a little bitch. He then said that he didn't mean it that way. Yet you clearly don't say someone is doing something "like" a little bitch without implying that they in fact are similar to a little bitch. His explanation was contorted and reads to me like he was goading annul more thereby shitting up the thread (might have worked had drH not stepped in). He did this in mad men as well ( http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668¤tpage=46#906 ) --spending day one going after "low-hanging fruit" discussion-wise. I give him some credit for being original with annul, but the rest of his posts are just harping on the usual early day one controversies (kj, shady). I know VE is good enough to know that this post is incredibly optimistic: On September 30 2012 23:28 VisceraEyes wrote: I've got my eye on ShadySands, annul and Mattchew right now. Pretty sure there's scum buried deep within that trio. Will you help me figure out who, if any of them, is most deserving of a rope around the neck? How is he really "pretty sure"? I'd say it's a trap or bait or something but he never follows it up as such. Instead I smell pre-justification. ##Vote: VisceraEyes On October 03 2012 21:33 Kreb wrote: + Show Spoiler + On October 03 2012 21:14 Z-BosoN wrote: Couple of thoughts from reading marvs filter, now that he is pretty much confirmed scum. First off, his reaction to kreb makes me raise an eyebrow. He was extremely aggressive for something that could simply have been a townie thought. Kreb also hadn't made an association case, he simply said that some people looked scummy. Also, kreb said that marvs node push made him look scummy and generally made a weak semicase vs marv. It didn't feel legit and marvs reaction felt forced. I myself don't know what I'm implying but I think this interaction will become useful later. There's also some interesting info regarding the node push. Marv stated that it didn't make sense at all from a mafia perspective, yet made the push. Pretty much an attempt at clearing suspicion. Now, I'm not gonna go and start accusing everyone on the node lynch because I myself sheeped it, as town. But Afaik, VE and marv basically started the Node push, and pretty much at the same time. Initially I thought this would clear node, but it's pretty easy to not actually make it go through as mafia. So, my conclusion from this is: VE looks pretty damn scummy right now. 1) He basically claimed he got RB(and its almost factual that at least one kill didn't go through). 2) marv showed weird hostility on the association kreb didn't make. 3) he co-led the Node push with another scum at the same time -> came from qt, quite possibly. They were pretty much caught with their pants down if it was indeed scum-influenced. Agreed. VE also didnt reply to any questions I asked him afterwards, nor did he reply to me calling him out for a very weak vote-switch to Node (left it to marv to do the dirty work by agressively defending my accusations while also clogging up the thread with plenty of posts?). He has also, should he be town, been either terribly bad or terribly unlucky in his scumhunting. Lets look at a few people he has touched on: 1) I've got my eye on ShadySands, annul and Mattchew right now. Pretty sure there's scum buried deep within that trio. 2 confirmed town flips. 2) Then the attack on annul - confirmed town flip. 3) After dropping annul, posting this I'm willing to lynch into ShadySands, kingjames01 as it stands. We really need more content from everyone though. while placing his vote on Shady. 2 confirmed town. 4) Voted Node - no flip on him yet though. 5) The worst part is that we didn't fucking lynch scum annul. Going back to annul (confirmed town) after mislynch. With very little motivation (and refused to explain himself when I questioned it). 6) Someone shoot him. We can lynch Node easier than Annul, and I want them both dead. Medics, on me and marv. DTs, on BC and Mattchew. We totally got this. Calling for a medic on a confirmed (yea, he is) scum, calling vig shot on a confirmed town. He is either scum or just randomly managed to call out about every single confirmed player (except Risen) the wrong alignment. VE is my top scum read atm. On October 03 2012 23:51 mkfuba07 wrote: + Show Spoiler + Alright, I'm going to be getting a bit more rest since I woke up for Code S. Current thoughts: I could definitely see VE being scum. His unfortunate scumhunting is a big piece of the puzzle, but his interaction with annul keeps nagging at me. On October 03 2012 09:48 VisceraEyes wrote: That's what you think...until he actually feels like he might be lynched. Then watch. *shiver* Palmar couldn't get the guy lynched. PALMAR. And his newbie brigade was in full force at the time! On October 03 2012 10:31 VisceraEyes wrote: What's your point? Did I ever say it was a skill you exclusively possess as scum? I didn't think I did :/ It took me a while to figure out why I was so annoyed by these posts, but I think I've figured it out. VE first emphasizes that as scum annul can become "scary" (which I assume means that he can appear to become a good contributor, though VE never actually says how annul becomes "scary"), but leaves out the fact that he might do the same exact thing as town. It doesn't feel like VE is trying to inform the town of annul's apparent meta, as much as emphasize the scummy aspects of annul's meta and attribute it entirely to scum-annul. It would feel the same way if marv came in and said that I can be incredibly wishy-washy as scum. He's emphasized in previous games that I am the master of wishy-washiness regardless of alignment (though I've only ever been scum once, for little over a day). If he were to come into this game and try to convince everyone that I'm only wishy-washy when I'm scum, then I would be incredibly suspicious of him (In fact, I believe that's part of why he avoided talking about me at all despite my case being in the same post as the Node one). In VE's case, it looks like he tried to do a similar thing, and then when annul called him out on it he tried to minimize the effect. Why say that scum-annul can be "scary" if town-annul can also be "scary" unless you're trying to make vigis take the shot without a proper reason? It seems like a pretty scummy interaction from VE. I'd really like to hear thoughts from others, as this is the first thing I feel pretty confident about this game. Finally, I'm still waiting on input from mementoss... I know that 15 pages is a lot to go through, but I'm not going to put him aside just because one of the people who was calling him out is going to flip scum. There are other lurkers, but he's promised more contributions twice now, and we've seen nothing from it. -Compiled by Kush | ||
iamperfection
United States9635 Posts
On October 04 2012 09:27 marvellosity wrote: but it's a fun game. and it's something i'm actually serious about :o something tells me you might play even if we dont want to | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On October 04 2012 09:04 mkfuba07 wrote: @SloOsh What do you think about my post regarding VE (linked above)? I see it as a reason to see VE as scum that doesn't simply revolve around him being incorrect. Yea, I see your point. I guess it didn't stick out to me because VE is a very social player and he just says stuff all the time and I've learn to dismiss these kind of stuff. While his treatment of 60-75% scum is different from what I would do, I don't think it's a certain tell by itself. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
But I'll tell you tomorrow. And I'll be right about it too. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Beacuse I don't remember you ever sharing that information. | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 04 2012 09:35 slOosh wrote: ? Oh. Yea that was what I was referring to, I guess I wasn't clear. Treatment of someone you think is 60~75% scum. you're 60-75% scum. Or do I mean 40-25%. Scum! Townie. Holy shit reversing 60-75 was hard. Anyway guys, if you leave me alive today I promise I'll shoot scum during the night and be all awesomesauce. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On October 04 2012 09:37 kushm4sta wrote: You said you were going to read through the thread again so you could figure things out. Instead of making a case against someone you just sit in the thread wise cracking? Me? Dude, we're lynching marv today. I can assure you I'm reading. I'll post something, don't you worry. It's not about the wise-cracking. Just...trust me guy. You won't want to lynch me when it's time to actually pick someone to lynch. | ||
iamperfection
United States9635 Posts
On October 04 2012 09:40 marvellosity wrote: I hate scum too. So let's lynch someone else today. i thought you were going to bed | ||
| ||