EPTTL Mafia XLVIII - Page 114
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
redFF Sandroba Drazerk Annul I'm 50/50 on whatever he is. If we didn't have 3 others that are definitely scum I'd probably vote for him today. But I'm not putting a fifty fifty ahead of 3 others that I'd call 95/5 Drazerk - I can sort of understand your supposed night 1 claim. However I'm not buying it when you state you're going to protect a DT. That's just pure scum move. redFF - You say to compare this game to your scum meta. OK. This is your scum meta. If Sandroba is town I'm fucking Santa Claus. This is not town Sandroba at work. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 12 2011 05:55 Jackal58 wrote: Drazerk - I can sort of understand your supposed night 1 claim. However I'm not buying it when you state you're going to protect a DT. That's just pure scum move. . Lies snowball... once you don't die it becomes worse and worse. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 12 2011 05:56 Drazerk wrote: Lies snowball... once you don't die it becomes worse and worse. Bullshit. If you were town you would have come clean once your teammates didn't kill you night 1. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 12 2011 05:57 Jackal58 wrote: Bullshit. If you were town you would have come clean once your teammates didn't kill you night 1. lol what? | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
i dont like playing metas when you have in-game shit so obviously red (drazerk). tell me what he is doing that makes him so red in THIS game. post a case (if you did already, repost it) | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
|
TruthBringer
United States578 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 12 2011 06:52 TruthBringer wrote: Let's all vote redFF. It doesn't seem like anyone thinks he isn't scummy, whereas there is plenty of reasonable doubt on drazerk and annul. THIS POST AND IM SCUMMY? | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Yes you are | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Warning PMs for those who have not yet voted/posted are being sent out. As per the rules, if you are clearly skirting the post requirement, at the end of today you will be modkilled. This is particularly true for those who have already been warned (in some cases, multiple times) | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
It's now 22:00 GMT, that means 23:00 central european and 24:00 eastern european (though I think syllogism was the only player in that timezone). The deadline is at a shitty time for europe. Last time I woke up to a fucking no-lynch. If there were going to be alternative wagons to annul, then they should have taken off by now. I am pretty much confirmed town by Zephirdd. I want you people to take a moment and think about what's happening here. Syllogism tried to shoot annul night 1 (just about confirmed now). Radfield campaigned for annul's death and supported my case last night, despite that, you morons didn't lynch him and chose a no-lynch. I have presented such a ridiculously solid case for this. And now I see some bullshit wagon coming on xsksc or someone else. Seriously, we are like three of the top town players in this game. Bumatlarge agrees with the case, and he's another great player. Give us the fucking benefit of the doubt and listen. Give me my lynch tonight. Don't fucking push it into a no-lynch, because you're never going to be able to push another wagon this late. Tonight annul hangs. If I'm wrong we'll deal with that tomorrow. But I don't think there is any chance I am. Why the fuck didn't you guys listen to radfield last night? Don't fuck this up. Every town player needs to be on annul tonight, we can't no-lynch ourselves into the endgame. I think we may be in lylo tomorrow if we mislynch tonight. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
Just freaking kill xsksc already. annul and Drazerk are not the best lynches, they are far from it IMO. Too much uncertainty in it. redFF also feels too weird for me. seriously, xsksc is the only choice here that is safe. Corrupt was scummy, xsksc is scum. Just do it already. Palmar, I really doubt you are lynching annul today unless scum decides to jump into it with full strength; if you are really that mad over him at least wait a day or so; We NEED this red lynch. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On December 12 2011 07:07 Zephirdd wrote: *sigh* at this rate we'll end up with a no-lynch. Just freaking kill xsksc already. annul and Drazerk are not the best lynches, they are far from it IMO. Too much uncertainty in it. redFF also feels too weird for me. seriously, xsksc is the only choice here that is safe. Corrupt was scummy, xsksc is scum. Just do it already. Palmar, I really doubt you are lynching annul today unless scum decides to jump into it with full strength; if you are really that mad over him at least wait a day or so; We NEED this red lynch. No, this is not about being safe you moron. Annul has the strongest case for being scum against him. And this late, there's 8 votes on annul and 3 on xsksc. Pushing an alternative lynch to annul is terrible at this point. You're insane. I'm not mad at him, I have a fuckton of respect for him. Squirming his way out of a lynch last night with the bullshit move he made was damning, and somehow people still don't think he's scum. That's some super good scum play. But I don't care, he's the one hanging. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 12 2011 07:07 Zephirdd wrote: *sigh* at this rate we'll end up with a no-lynch. Just freaking kill xsksc already. annul and Drazerk are not the best lynches, they are far from it IMO. Too much uncertainty in it. redFF also feels too weird for me. seriously, xsksc is the only choice here that is safe. Corrupt was scummy, xsksc is scum. Just do it already. Palmar, I really doubt you are lynching annul today unless scum decides to jump into it with full strength; if you are really that mad over him at least wait a day or so; We NEED this red lynch. If Annul is town I'd say scum is already on him "full strength" | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
Seriously, we are like three of the top town players in this game. Bumatlarge agrees with the case, and he's another great player. Give us the fucking benefit of the doubt and listen. Give me my lynch tonight. Don't fucking push it into a no-lynch, because you're never going to be able to push another wagon this late. *sigh* I'm sighing too much. So, we lynch annul, he flips blue and town is fucked thanks to you, or he flips red and we praise you for ever. high-risk, high-reward? I never liked gambling, but you do have a point on the 'you won't be able to lynch somebody else'. *sigh* I guess I'll need to do that leap of faith. I'll leave this on your hands Palmar. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On December 12 2011 07:05 Palmar wrote: Seriously, we are like three of the top town players in this game. Bumatlarge agrees with the case, and he's another great player. Give us the fucking benefit of the doubt and listen. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority#Fallacious_appeals_to_authority Secondly, because the argument is inductive (which in this sense implies that the truth of the conclusion cannot be guaranteed by the truth of the premises), it also is fallacious to assert that the conclusion must be true. palmar provides no logical case against me from the beginning and palmar continues to attack me using blatant logical fallacy. the case on me is useless. also, i am still waiting to hear the redff case in detail. | ||
| ||
