EPTI don't think Warrent is a slam dunk, I don't like how quickly everyone got on him today. Mafia can easily throw 3 votes on whoever they want today.
Don't trust Rainbows because he says so. Make up your own mind. We can still win this.
Newbie Mafia XL - Page 52
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Smancer
United States379 Posts
I don't think Warrent is a slam dunk, I don't like how quickly everyone got on him today. Mafia can easily throw 3 votes on whoever they want today. Don't trust Rainbows because he says so. Make up your own mind. We can still win this. | ||
|
Moloch
Canada222 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
##Vote: JarJarDrinks | ||
|
nobodywonder
United States848 Posts
I think its best to no lynch at this point. I think itll be much more clear that way. | ||
|
Fishgle
United States2174 Posts
Your defense of Smancer is "Smancer defended me, so he can't be scum". "TRN is not scum otherwise he would have voted for me" - it seems to me scum has been getting mis-lynches off the whole game with little direct effort. Why would he jump in now, since you already have enough votes anyway. Plus, he's your scum buddy, so... I've already told you why I'm not voting for jarjar, even if he does look scummy. It looks like a set-up. As for nobodywonder, sorry you're right, you haven't ever directly defended him. But he's as likely to be scum as jarjar is. Just as you are questioning why I'm choosing NW over jarjar, i'm curious as to why you do the opposite. I think warent is scum, guys. But if you guys insist, i'll vote for a no-lynch. It's a stupid idea, tho. The only way we'll have chance of winning this is if we kill off their roleblocker so that rainbows can get his nightkill off. | ||
|
Smancer
United States379 Posts
| ||
|
Fishgle
United States2174 Posts
JarJarDrinks (3) Saraf, jrkirby, jampidampi - first 3 to die | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
On April 13 2013 08:32 Fishgle wrote: @Warent Your defense of Smancer is "Smancer defended me, so he can't be scum". "TRN is not scum otherwise he would have voted for me" - it seems to me scum has been getting mis-lynches off the whole game with little direct effort. Why would he jump in now, since you already have enough votes anyway. Plus, he's your scum buddy, so... I've already told you why I'm not voting for jarjar, even if he does look scummy. It looks like a set-up. As for nobodywonder, sorry you're right, you haven't ever directly defended him. But he's as likely to be scum as jarjar is. Just as you are questioning why I'm choosing NW over jarjar, i'm curious as to why you do the opposite. I think warent is scum, guys. But if you guys insist, i'll vote for a no-lynch. It's a stupid idea, tho. The only way we'll have chance of winning this is if we kill off their roleblocker so that rainbows can get his nightkill off. Fish: Your defense of Smancer is "Smancer defended me, so he can't be scum". Huge difference now compared to the other days, when I flip green it's game over. Scum does not need to think about the future. game with little direct effort. Why would he jump in now, since you already have enough votes anyway. Plus, he's your scum buddy, so... Er, right. No he did earlier. I don't need to convince you of anything anyway. Nw is using logic and providing reason, he had his vote on me and started to think - "hey this might actually be wrong". | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
On April 13 2013 08:39 Fishgle wrote: day 1 vote count JarJarDrinks (3) Saraf, jrkirby, jampidampi - first 3 to die Or perhaps the easy explanation? They were on the right track. | ||
|
Fishgle
United States2174 Posts
On April 13 2013 08:41 Warent wrote: Or perhaps the easy explanation? They were on the right track. possibly. But the doubt is enough for me to not vote for him. annnd you're right i should be equally cautious towards voting for you. But i think a no-lynch is giving away any chance of winning :S | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
VOTE COUNT: Warent (3) No-Lynch (2) Rainbows (1) TheRavensName, JarJarDrinks (2) Smancer, Warent Not Voting: Deadline is in 10 minutes. Voting is mandatory. Currently Warent is Set to be lynched! If you see your vote (or anyone else') out of place please inform me or someone else on the hosting team so that we can correct it. | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
Vote: No-Lynch | ||
|
Warent
Sweden205 Posts
It's hard to get it right!  | ||
|
Moloch
Canada222 Posts
If he was, the rest of the scum could easily vote for something else and outvote the people voting for Warent. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
do it | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
##Vote:Warent No, its pretty easy to get it right. Fish is right. | ||
|
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
vote: no-lynch | ||
| ||
