| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9175 Posts
On October 10 2014 11:47 zev318 wrote: you mean after 5 years he finally got a jumper? impressive. I'm seriously impressed by his progression, some players don't improve much. He's assisting more, is better in the post and has improved his jump shot and free throws every season. also this: http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/10/10/boris-diaw-can-make-an-extra-500000-by-not-gaining-weight-this-season/ | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
parkufarku
882 Posts
On October 08 2014 12:08 Jerubaal wrote: Houstonians are the weirdest sportsfans. they're also the most racist too. figures..texas. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On October 12 2014 04:15 parkufarku wrote: they're also the most racist too. figures..texas. I have to thank you. I would never have even noticed all these racists in Texas if you people on the internet didn't tell me about them. Thanks so much for opening my eyes. | ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
lmao | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13430 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
Too bad about Durant. Intrigued to see what Westbrook's usage rate is without KD. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
FakePseudo
Belgium716 Posts
On October 11 2014 11:41 Ace wrote: http://thedissnba.com/2014/10/10/a-sinister-selfie-the-san-antonio-spurs-and-their-character-issues/ Trying so hard to get hired by the Sun. Or maybe he could be the color guy on Espn1stTake who forces steven AS to take the spurs' side at some point :p. | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On October 13 2014 01:54 AgentW wrote: Okay, Skip. Too bad about Durant. Intrigued to see what Westbrook's usage rate is without KD. 40 shots, easy. | ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13430 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9175 Posts
| ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On October 14 2014 10:18 Ace wrote: https://theespnwatch.wordpress.com/2014/10/10/pity-the-billionaire-with-apologies-to-tom-frank/ Umm...the guy is stupid because eliminating guaranteed contracts also does nothing to affect the owners' bottom lines because the revenue split between players and ownership is unaffected. Just like in the max contract debate it is just redistributing the same amount of money amongst players. In fact, even the salary cap of each team is meaningless with regards to the owners vs. players. The only things that matter in the actual negotiation (and the owners win them because they know this) is the revenue split, and what types of income get counted as part of said split. All the things like salary cap, max contracts, salary floors, revenue sharing, etc are all just debates either between different classes of owners or between different classes of players. TLDR: Article is wrong about the basics, and is just an idiot saying things that would make redditors get angry. | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On October 14 2014 04:16 Xeris wrote: Welp, Westbrook's value in free agency this summer is going to be highly dependent on how he can carry the team this summer. you mean, a max contract or a max contract or.... a max contract? btw a good point i read elsewhere, the NBAPA probably would not be in favour of getting rid of the max contract. other than the lebrons and the durants, very few players would benefit from the removal of the max contract. and it would actually mean less money for the majority of their players. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On October 14 2014 10:38 cLutZ wrote: Umm...the guy is stupid because eliminating guaranteed contracts also does nothing to affect the owners' bottom lines because the revenue split between players and ownership is unaffected. Just like in the max contract debate it is just redistributing the same amount of money amongst players. In fact, even the salary cap of each team is meaningless with regards to the owners vs. players. The only things that matter in the actual negotiation (and the owners win them because they know this) is the revenue split, and what types of income get counted as part of said split. All the things like salary cap, max contracts, salary floors, revenue sharing, etc are all just debates either between different classes of owners or between different classes of players. TLDR: Article is wrong about the basics, and is just an idiot saying things that would make redditors get angry. Without guarantees you can just cut players at any point once they stop producing at a certain level. You can turn a 20/4 into a 3/1 and save money that way. Remember owners don't have to spend all of the money by the cap  That part isn't solely about the money but about job security. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Online Event
WardiTV Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
INu's Battles
Cure vs herO
ByuN vs Rogue
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
Patches Events
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
