EPTOn September 09 2017 22:36 Durnuu wrote:
Shitty ravager build hype
Shitty ravager build hype
This is the memest timeline
[SSL 2017] Challenger Stage 2 - Week 4 - Page 2
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
This is the memest timeline | ||
|
EatingBomber
1017 Posts
| ||
|
sparklyresidue
United States5521 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
On September 09 2017 22:41 EatingBomber wrote: And he refuses to transition There's no real transition from shitty ravager build. | ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
| ||
|
romson87
Poland487 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
On September 09 2017 22:58 romson87 wrote: Nice call from Rapid and Valdes..favourable engagement for ByuN? lol It was pretty favorable, 3/3 vs 2/2 with a bigger army and better concave. He just ran out of steam behind it because his economy is shit. A good trade wasn't good enough. | ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
Who would have thought! | ||
|
romson87
Poland487 Posts
On September 09 2017 22:59 Elentos wrote: It was pretty favorable, 3/3 vs 2/2 with a bigger army and better concave. He just ran out of steam behind it because his economy is shit. A good trade wasn't good enough. Traded a lot of marines for zerglings a couple of hydras and 1 infestor, I'd still call it a favourable engagement for Rogue. | ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4901 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
On September 09 2017 23:08 romson87 wrote: Traded a lot of marines for zerglings a couple of hydras and 1 infestor, I'd still call it a favourable engagement for Rogue. He killed a lot of hydras, not just a couple, and a hatch. The problem was that the game was going so poorly that it didn't do enough. Before the fight Rogue was on a 4k bank so he could live even with heavy losses. | ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
| ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
|
EatingBomber
1017 Posts
| ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55456 Posts
| ||
| ||
