MLG only because of the larger player pool. The delay at the beginning and the day 1 stream sucked ass. I wonder how a larger scale IEM SC2 Event would compare to MLG.

hacpee

United States740 Posts

October 18 2010 05:45 GMT

GSL isn't in the poll?

Subversion

South Africa3620 Posts

October 18 2010 05:45 GMT

where's gsl? :O

also, where can i find vods of mlg? are there any?

GTR

48572 Posts

October 18 2010 05:47 GMT

gsl isn't in america.

G3nXsiS

United States656 Posts

October 18 2010 05:48 GMT

IEM definitely mainly because of the overall players that attended with Idra, Huk and of course my favorite player atm Select.

enzym

Germany1033 Posts

October 18 2010 05:49 GMT

very, very a hard pick for me. cologne was >> raleigh easily but this time, even though iem hat carmac and fenix's fantastic games, you just got to see more of the players at mlg dc because of some limitations iem had. or maybe i just see it that way because you did see a lot from the players at iem cologne.

hard pick. but dc wins by a close margin.

hacpee

United States740 Posts

October 18 2010 05:49 GMT

#10

On October 18 2010 14:47 GTR wrote:
gsl isn't in america.

Well it said best overall SC2 event, not best overall SC2 event in America.

bigjmachine

United States309 Posts

October 18 2010 05:51 GMT

#11

MLG, very good event

Noxie

United States2188 Posts

October 18 2010 05:53 GMT

#12

Had to go with MLG.. I think the player pool really made it interesting.

Keitzer

United States2505 Posts

October 18 2010 06:06 GMT

#13

MLG by far. Stream was better quality wise, more matches, different casters, etc. Just all around better.

QuothTheRaven

United States5512 Posts

October 18 2010 06:08 GMT

#14

Definitely MLG. Day9, JP, and Wheat did a fantastic job, the matches were great, the SotG mini-casts and interviews with the players gave a very human feel to the event, and the shots of the crowd were awesome. Stream problems aside, it was a really solid event.

On_Slaught

United States11751 Posts

October 18 2010 06:10 GMT

#15

I enjoy the fact that IEM gives us more opportunity to see competitive play but;

1. There wasn't a single zerg at IEM (not their fault).

2. There were A LOT of issues that I remember (like never showing the players and bad stream).

3. Frankly the casting was better at MLG.

4. MLG had a lot of behind the scenes stuff and constantly showed the players and their reactions. It was much more immersive.

IEM did one thing better though... they randomly had classical music playing in the background during one of their matches, on Xelnaga I think.

FuzzyJAM

Scotland4649 Posts

October 18 2010 06:11 GMT

#16

On October 18 2010 14:48 G3nXsiS wrote:
IEM definitely mainly because of the overall players that attended with Idra, Huk and of course my favorite player atm Select.

Huh? You're thinking of MLG.

I voted for MLG. I thought it was a great event despite the technical screw ups at the start.

Bear4188

United States1797 Posts

October 18 2010 06:21 GMT

#17

The games at MLG DC were phenomenal.

undyinglight

United States593 Posts

October 18 2010 06:22 GMT

#18

MLG because of the Mothership.

Lmah

United States17 Posts

October 18 2010 06:27 GMT

#19

I think MLG had better matches of the 2.. but it really didn't look like a comfortable experience for the players. I think IEM Cologne was the best of the 4 if you look at all 4 of the events.

I did like MLG Raleigh better than MLG DC though. MLG's free stream quality was terrible at DC.

I hope they work on improving the experience for the players, it's an insult to their skill level. IEM Cologne seemed the most professional of the events.

Blizzard does need to add LAN support to SC2 though, there has been some lag issues in every event.

2g4u

Bulgaria27 Posts

October 18 2010 06:50 GMT

#20

/offtopic
Best overall SC2 events are held in Korea, then in Europe and at last in USA.

/ontopic

The poll question should be changed to "Best overall SC2 event in USA in last month" or "Which of those two events was better" ?