|
On March 19 2008 09:50 Falcynn wrote: Shallow...if fusion posted any screenshots of a PM do you really think anyone would believe him after what happened last game? If anything fusion would just be getting himself lynched.
I know, but I'm not going to risk it. Especially if he and Artanis are in it together, seeing as they've both sent me close to identical pm's
|
On March 19 2008 09:50 ahrara_ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 09:47 Ace wrote: If ANY Detective speaks up against the Mayor and we can't decide whether or not who to believe, we go to the ultimatum approach - just lynch the DT first and if he is telling the truth the Mayor is Mafia. Boom - Mafia Mayor gone by the second day.
That's what I was looking for. You've completely won me over.
offtopic : how is DT short for detective?
DeTective? DetecTive?
|
Ok fusion now you're just wasting your time
|
On March 19 2008 10:19 CDRdude wrote:Hey guys, I just got this totally legit, 100% non-edited PM from Shallow! Wow, what are the chances
Didn't you use that same picture last game as well? :p
|
On March 19 2008 10:24 fusionsdf wrote:
LOL the best part is that it says "to : ShaLLoW[baY]" and not from.
|
I don't know what the point of the sudden influx of shitty PM doctoring is, by the way
|
On March 19 2008 12:13 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 12:11 Empyrean wrote:On March 19 2008 12:07 JeeJee wrote: people who vote for empyrean crack me up. if he's legit, the best he can do for us is verify the mayor then get shot by mafia, because there's no reason to vote for him at all, since saboteur will juts be laughin at us (realize that he had nobody to roleblock until empyrean went "im dt lulz!") if we elect him
I PM'd Ace something. Don't worry. Hi FS incarnate. How are you this fine eve?
*watches as JeeJee slowly stirs the shit*
|
On March 19 2008 12:20 ~OpZ~ wrote: dt is detective?
apparently, although i still dont understand why
|
Conjohnner just joined tl-west, I wonder what he's up to!
woopsie wrong thread, Ambition is thattaway!
|
On March 19 2008 12:26 ahrara_ wrote: Shallow, on this page alone you have three posts that pretty much contribute nothing. I'm sure everybody appreciates your clue analysis from before, but the pointless one liners are annoying. There are enough posts to wade through already, and you've made 20 or so such posts already today. Please stop.
Oh fuck off, I'm not even dead this time so please no bitching about me posting.
And I even said that one of the posts was an accident.
|
On March 19 2008 12:59 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 12:57 ahrara_ wrote: I see clues as largely a means of supporting a suspicion, not the beginning of one. Like I said, if you've been following the thread, there have been people who've done some weird things that warrant suspicions. Nothing for sure, but plenty of starting points not based on clues. This is something that needs constant repeating.
You seriously do remind me of Tracil last game. You just don't say "scum" as every second word.
|
On March 19 2008 13:02 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 13:00 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:On March 19 2008 12:59 Ace wrote:On March 19 2008 12:57 ahrara_ wrote: I see clues as largely a means of supporting a suspicion, not the beginning of one. Like I said, if you've been following the thread, there have been people who've done some weird things that warrant suspicions. Nothing for sure, but plenty of starting points not based on clues. This is something that needs constant repeating. You seriously do remind me of Tracil last game. You just don't say "scum" as every second word. I'm being careful about throwing that word around, I don't want to start any false bandwagons by accident. I haven't even accused anyone yet lol
This isn't meant as an insult or anything by the way, it's just a statement of fact.
|
On March 19 2008 13:40 Chuiu wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 13:00 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:On March 19 2008 12:59 Ace wrote:On March 19 2008 12:57 ahrara_ wrote: I see clues as largely a means of supporting a suspicion, not the beginning of one. Like I said, if you've been following the thread, there have been people who've done some weird things that warrant suspicions. Nothing for sure, but plenty of starting points not based on clues. This is something that needs constant repeating. You seriously do remind me of Tracil last game. You just don't say "scum" as every second word. As long as he's not using 'scum' and '<->' ten times a post... (seriously though <-> started to annoy the fuck out of me)
<-> <-> <-> wow it annoys me to type that, let alone read it.
|
On March 19 2008 13:52 Falcynn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 13:41 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:On March 19 2008 13:40 Chuiu wrote:On March 19 2008 13:00 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:On March 19 2008 12:59 Ace wrote:On March 19 2008 12:57 ahrara_ wrote: I see clues as largely a means of supporting a suspicion, not the beginning of one. Like I said, if you've been following the thread, there have been people who've done some weird things that warrant suspicions. Nothing for sure, but plenty of starting points not based on clues. This is something that needs constant repeating. You seriously do remind me of Tracil last game. You just don't say "scum" as every second word. As long as he's not using 'scum' and '<->' ten times a post... (seriously though <-> started to annoy the fuck out of me) <-> <-> <-> wow it annoys me to type that, let alone read it. eh? I don't recall Tracil using <-> that many times in his posts...it would be annoying though.
Me neither but I just realized how irritating it would be!
|
On March 19 2008 13:58 CDRdude wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2008 13:39 ShadowDrgn wrote: Clue: he was cut off by Mr. Blonde, coming out of nowhere it seemed Suspect: CDRdude Reason: Sig mentions lurkers unburrowing, which can "come out of nowhere" and cut armies off.
While I appreciate your thoughts on the clues, I disagree with this one.
Really? I can't begin to imagine why.
|
By the way, I apologize to Vharox, I didn't even consider that it could be your brother, and you didn't seem like the kind to cheat when we were discussing last game.
|
On March 20 2008 04:58 Empyrean wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2008 04:55 BlindAlbino wrote: ace that seems very flawed. How will you know the other detectives besides empyrean is telling the truth? they would have to reveal themselves for this to happen. And finally, if I do die this night, I'd like to just post one thing after my death.
Be sure that it's 100% seriuz buzinez or people will start bitching at you for ages.
|
On March 20 2008 06:33 Hittegods wrote: While this is mafia, it's also TL mafia, so don't expect people to act 100% rational or serious.
Quoted for motherfuckin' TRUTH!
|
I'm compiling a suspicion list based on peoples actions throughout the game so far. I won't be posting it until later, when there is more to go on.
|
On March 20 2008 09:26 Showtime! wrote: We're the mob. What do you expect?
Are you now?
|
|
|
|