End of the World Party Mafia - Page 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
On March 03 2019 19:38 Holyflare wrote: Got 'em. You're either mafia who got caught out or lying as town. I think you're floundering. + Show Spoiler + I was never lying, you on the other hand: On March 02 2019 20:33 Holyflare wrote: Didn't like rayn that much tbh. He seems to not be saying much but talking in walls of text and circles. The red bolded part has many lies in it: Lie #1: As i said at the time i was not "not saying much" compared to what was actually happening in the thread. Everyone can go and check that out. Lie #2: I never talked in circles. Lie #3: Even if i did it doesn't make me mafia because i tend to do that as town. I am calling this a lie because Holyflare should be 100% aware of this fact. * * I never said i ALWAYS do that as town, so this twisting of my words that if i don't it makes me mafia atm is just hilarious... | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
Very good read A+ | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
HF Acrofales Meapak Palmar sicklucker - i think he is too calm to be town, dunno hard to explain Then probably x number of lurkers or something because i am most likely wrong on something. Trfel doesn't look town anymore, FF still doesn't impress in anyway but i am terrible at reading him. I don't really have any problems with BC. Rels and Mocsta are people who tend to put effort as mafia because they hate to not help their team so i think their absence points towards town more, especially Rels' who genuinely doesn't know what to do on D1 as town. Umm what else, Exo_ seems more like stubborn idiot than mafia, Maybe tubesock is mafia because he acknowledged HF's comment on me as scumread yet +1'd it despite it being lies. DF looked okayish, a bit "lame" but given he's not been around much i'd give him more time. If Ace doesn't start playing properly on D2 lynch with fire. I understand he may not want to give away too much information as per his playbook on D1 but this becomes unacceptable D2. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
On March 03 2019 20:02 Palmar wrote: No one on TL knows me worse than you rayn, no one. You compare me every game to some version of me that only exists in your mind and conclude shit. Na-ah, this is not debatable because there is nothing to "know", one can just go and read your posts during weekends in games (especially D1's). | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
On March 03 2019 20:02 Palmar wrote: Like why the fuck are you complaining about Acro doing legwork on lurkers, what the hell is that? Because giving a list of liek 10 people and calling all of them scum or "let's lynch them" and not havign a single read on anyone else doesn't actually accomplish anything. Like earlier he made a big post which said: 1) rsoultin shouldnt be any alignment atm 2) bc shouldnt be any alignment atm 3) hell everyone should be on your watchlist 4) Grack made a useless list post as first entry and then fucked off again. It seemed quite a lot like scum doing stuff to "seem active" ---> continues making lurker list posts after that all game | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
I feel like the whole first chapter is full of nonsense because it doesn't really say anything. Second chapter also doesn't say anything because Sentinel isn't playing, it's like saying "i wouldn't call you mafia if you were more town". Another thing; Do you think a guy who jumps guns blazing on people who jokingly (or not) claim mafia at the start of the game can somehow thing it is less suspicious to fake claim masons than to say that they are not actually masons? I mean like if your principles that strong on stuff like that (like for example you and your policies) how on earth does it makes sense the guy who is telling the truth is more worth questioning than the guy who is lying? I call big big BS on Meapak's stuff on that. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
##vote Acrofales | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
On March 04 2019 20:07 Palmar wrote: Rayn did quickly defuse when I was arguing with him though, although some of it may be my reluctance to engage in the argument with him. I don't know what it means. Yeah i tried to actually talk with you when you asked me to, then you never answered anything but with nonsense posts and then left.. So there is that. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
On March 04 2019 20:37 Palmar wrote: well you were gearing up for a shitstorm, and I'm trying to stay away from those by walking away from situations where I want to yell at people. That is completely made up interpretation of the situation. I was being polite and shit and these are the last things i asked you before you fucking off: On March 03 2019 20:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar, if you are town, go seriously read Acrofales' filter and actually look at what he says. Then look at his case on Grackaroni and read the posts after that again. On March 03 2019 20:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: First of all there is no figuring out if your policy lynch is ideological or scum, because its ideological regardless of your affiliation. I am not arguing lynching Sentinel is a bad thing i just dont come to games participating into policy lynches on people who dont post or dont read their role pm, because they should not join the games in the first place and should just fuck off and get modkilled. I play because i want to play and lynch mafia and there is no way to tell if those people are mafia or not. I feel like the whole first chapter is full of nonsense because it doesn't really say anything. Second chapter also doesn't say anything because Sentinel isn't playing, it's like saying "i wouldn't call you mafia if you were more town". Another thing; Do you think a guy who jumps guns blazing on people who jokingly (or not) claim mafia at the start of the game can somehow thing it is less suspicious to fake claim masons than to say that they are not actually masons? I mean like if your principles that strong on stuff like that (like for example you and your policies) how on earth does it makes sense the guy who is telling the truth is more worth questioning than the guy who is lying? I call big big BS on Meapak's stuff on that. On March 03 2019 20:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes Damdred claimed masons and i don't believe that was an obvious joke for Meapak because i am assuming he doesn't know either Damdred or LS. The worst part is that when i asked why did he question LS for telling the truth instead of the liar Damdred he said it wasn't actually for that but for something else, which doesn't make any sense because if you want to question something else then why don't you ask it in the first place instead of some completely useless question? LS answered him and he never followed up with his suggested "what i was really after" posting until i accused him. In the second post i answer to your response to the first one. We disagree but nowhere i am gearing up to a shitstorm. You literally said nothing in your post towards acro except that you basically confessed you had a townread on him based on shit things and that you hadn't actually read him at all and apparently weren't even willing to do that. So mr. Palmar now you are just lying. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
Changed vote to blazinghand. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland42134 Posts
| ||
| ||