|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 15:54 rsoultin wrote: to be more specific, i see a waffleface on rayn a why is damdy hard-defending tina's one post of awesome - oops he was saying lynch her for that and a prod that to me seemed more aimed at joni than damdy?
so what am i missing here?
Also this post is wrong. Ec is saying damdred hard defended geript and he didn't like it. Which is a good comment to make because it doesn't make sense if you don't know damdred that well.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
And why is damdred your tip town read?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 18:07 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 18:07 rsoultin wrote:On July 13 2017 18:05 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 15:54 rsoultin wrote: to be more specific, i see a waffleface on rayn a why is damdy hard-defending tina's one post of awesome - oops he was saying lynch her for that and a prod that to me seemed more aimed at joni than damdy?
so what am i missing here? Also this post is wrong. Ec is saying damdred hard defended geript and he didn't like it. Which is a good comment to make because it doesn't make sense if you don't know damdred that well. ??? think you should reread that buddy <3
I did. He said damdred feels off for his defence of a person off of one post. That was geript at the time.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 18:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: I mean, i think geript is doing the gumshoe incident thingy™ where he is not trying to figure out who is mafia rather than saying things he thinks town wants to hear.
I can get behind that. More thread coppy than giving reads. Literally trying to disprove things to you while town reading you. Waste of time.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Yeah but why is damdred town?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Not since you stated it and I asked why.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 18:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: It's the way he presents the geript read, regardless of if he is right or wrong it makes him town.
Oh you mean this. Don't agree.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Damdred knows what his own meta is. He probably has some kind of meta with geript. I don't think it's out there for him to fake that kind of read if he's mafia.
Still feel like damdred was uncharacteristically annoyed somehow.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 14:54 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 11:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 10:59 Damdred wrote: I'm right about geript 100% rayb.
And rux Idk what you want exactly me to take her post and just mark everything as boring? Like it by itself does make her mafia, and it doesn't necessarily even make her mafia. I'd just rather lynch Tina when she acts a certain way over someone like you who I don't know how to read yet and don't have enough information on. Damdred, you know a lot of people playing mafia. Why is Tina any more scum than anyone else with low/no posts. I could apply the same meta read to rels, or VA or tumblewood. And for a fact I don't even agree with your rsoul meta read of her not doing anything when mafia. From my own personal experience with her she fights hard even as mafia. But the fact that you chose her out of all the people in the game to put a scum meta read on makes no sense to me. How is this any different to what you were doing with Geript?
This is a good post though. Ruxxar gets called out for poeing geript out of players that are playing. Throws a hissy fit when called out.
Then calls out damdred for not thinking about low/no post people.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
We'll have to disagree then. I put much more weight into damdred's ability as mafia. I think he could definitely know geript is town and bend a read to fit his thought process.
I also think it's extremely uncharacteristic of damdred to throw out that many reasons on his read on geript this early whereas normally he just has a few feels and sticks to those instead.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 10:59 Damdred wrote: I'm right about geript 100% rayb.
And rux Idk what you want exactly me to take her post and just mark everything as boring? Like it by itself does make her mafia, and it doesn't necessarily even make her mafia. I'd just rather lynch Tina when she acts a certain way over someone like you who I don't know how to read yet and don't have enough information on. Damdred, elaborate please.... This doesn't make any sense, you either think you have a read on me or you don't. You're saying both here.
He's talking to ruxxar.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 20:11 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 19:06 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 14:54 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 11:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 10:59 Damdred wrote: I'm right about geript 100% rayb.
And rux Idk what you want exactly me to take her post and just mark everything as boring? Like it by itself does make her mafia, and it doesn't necessarily even make her mafia. I'd just rather lynch Tina when she acts a certain way over someone like you who I don't know how to read yet and don't have enough information on. Damdred, you know a lot of people playing mafia. Why is Tina any more scum than anyone else with low/no posts. I could apply the same meta read to rels, or VA or tumblewood. And for a fact I don't even agree with your rsoul meta read of her not doing anything when mafia. From my own personal experience with her she fights hard even as mafia. But the fact that you chose her out of all the people in the game to put a scum meta read on makes no sense to me. How is this any different to what you were doing with Geript? This is a good post though. Ruxxar gets called out for poeing geript out of players that are playing. Throws a hissy fit when called out. Then calls out damdred for not thinking about low/no post people. You are confused. I called out geript for looking for targets to sheep. I called out damdred for attributing a meta a meta scum read to rsoul when there are plenty of people to attribute scum meta reads to who have no or very low post count.
And who would those people be?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 20:11 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 19:06 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 14:54 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 11:04 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 10:59 Damdred wrote: I'm right about geript 100% rayb.
And rux Idk what you want exactly me to take her post and just mark everything as boring? Like it by itself does make her mafia, and it doesn't necessarily even make her mafia. I'd just rather lynch Tina when she acts a certain way over someone like you who I don't know how to read yet and don't have enough information on. Damdred, you know a lot of people playing mafia. Why is Tina any more scum than anyone else with low/no posts. I could apply the same meta read to rels, or VA or tumblewood. And for a fact I don't even agree with your rsoul meta read of her not doing anything when mafia. From my own personal experience with her she fights hard even as mafia. But the fact that you chose her out of all the people in the game to put a scum meta read on makes no sense to me. How is this any different to what you were doing with Geript? This is a good post though. Ruxxar gets called out for poeing geript out of players that are playing. Throws a hissy fit when called out. Then calls out damdred for not thinking about low/no post people. You are confused. I called out geript for looking for targets to sheep. I called out damdred for attributing a meta a meta scum read to rsoul when there are plenty of people to attribute scum meta reads to who have no or very low post count.
Yes but the point is your argument that you fought against rayn was that "oh geript is scummy by poe out of the people that posted because what is the point of reading 0 post players!"
Then you are confused why dandred isn't targeting 0 post players.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 08:08 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 08:01 ruXxar wrote: And if geript is lynched I wouldn't shed a single tear. On July 13 2017 08:03 ruXxar wrote: He looks worse than the rest. Aka Poe so far. I am gonna say this is a big pile of bullshit because half of the game hasn't even posted yet so you -- as town -- can't have a single idea of if geript is town or mafia by PoE. This statement is clearly bullshit because I can only Poe people that have posted so far. Also, 1+1 = 2, more news at 11.
You posted this.
Why couldn't damdred do the same?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Oh baby some good points.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 20:53 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 20:50 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 08:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 08:01 ruXxar wrote: And if geript is lynched I wouldn't shed a single tear. On July 13 2017 08:03 ruXxar wrote: He looks worse than the rest. Aka Poe so far. I am gonna say this is a big pile of bullshit because half of the game hasn't even posted yet so you -- as town -- can't have a single idea of if geript is town or mafia by PoE. This statement is clearly bullshit because I can only Poe people that have posted so far. Also, 1+1 = 2, more news at 11. You posted this. Why couldn't damdred do the same? Because damdred clearly said he wanted to lynch rsoul based on meta activity and *not* based on the post she actually made. There's an important distinction here that is crucial to my argument.
His read was nothing about activity. It was dull, boring and not interactive.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Hey rayn. If you thought the case ruxxar posted to ec was good and ec didn't answer it properly why do you not engage ec on it?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 20:59 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 20:55 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 20:53 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 20:50 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 08:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 08:01 ruXxar wrote: And if geript is lynched I wouldn't shed a single tear. On July 13 2017 08:03 ruXxar wrote: He looks worse than the rest. Aka Poe so far. I am gonna say this is a big pile of bullshit because half of the game hasn't even posted yet so you -- as town -- can't have a single idea of if geript is town or mafia by PoE. This statement is clearly bullshit because I can only Poe people that have posted so far. Also, 1+1 = 2, more news at 11. You posted this. Why couldn't damdred do the same? Because damdred clearly said he wanted to lynch rsoul based on meta activity and *not* based on the post she actually made. There's an important distinction here that is crucial to my argument. His read was nothing about activity. It was dull, boring and not interactive. ... how is that not about activity?
Because I could post 20 pages of filter and still be dull, boring and not interactive??
It doesn't matter anymore though because it clearly means activity to you so my point is moot. Carry on.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 13 2017 21:02 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2017 20:55 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 20:53 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 20:50 Holyflare wrote:On July 13 2017 08:08 ruXxar wrote:On July 13 2017 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:On July 13 2017 08:01 ruXxar wrote: And if geript is lynched I wouldn't shed a single tear. On July 13 2017 08:03 ruXxar wrote: He looks worse than the rest. Aka Poe so far. I am gonna say this is a big pile of bullshit because half of the game hasn't even posted yet so you -- as town -- can't have a single idea of if geript is town or mafia by PoE. This statement is clearly bullshit because I can only Poe people that have posted so far. Also, 1+1 = 2, more news at 11. You posted this. Why couldn't damdred do the same? Because damdred clearly said he wanted to lynch rsoul based on meta activity and *not* based on the post she actually made. There's an important distinction here that is crucial to my argument. His read was nothing about activity. It was dull, boring and not interactive. How is a person with 1 post supposed to be "interactive"?
Make a read and interact with a person instead of saying hi and leaving. It's not that she has one post but what she did with her time here that he's commenting on.
|
|
|
|