|
On October 06 2016 02:58 Koshi wrote: Ok. So let's not lynch into these names. Calix, Koshi, Oats, NU, Superbia, Grack, Damdred, Marv, batsnacks
Who is left? Palmar justanothertownie Holyflare Stutters695
Pretty good stuff. I like this list.
|
HF, do you not see what I see with Palmar?
|
lol Stutters is never going to catch up.
|
On October 06 2016 03:05 Holyflare wrote: you keep linking the palmar post and I have no idea what you're referring to grack, palmar could quite easily be mafia yes and that's why he's in my list Because he didn't read, yet he's pretending like he has read. When town Palmar doesn't read he'll rub it in your face. I was the one that started all of the JAT stuff and he's saying I don't have any direction. He also seems to believe that JAT was spamming out posts in response to himself, which was pretty clearly not the case.
|
On October 06 2016 03:16 Holyflare wrote: I'll just sheep koshi on whatever I don't really care. Aha it's a trap. You think you are sheeping the Koshi, but really you are sheeping the Grackaroni just as I have planned.
|
There are no good information lynches and bad information lynches here Calix, except maybe Stutters. We're going to lynch whoever we think is most likely to be scum, and I think it's Palmar.
|
On October 06 2016 03:35 marvellosity wrote: i'm on page 51 and the lynch on calix seems fine, gonna chill my vote on bats though.
good chance maf maf i suppose Really? Why do you think Calix is maf?
|
On October 06 2016 03:40 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:38 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:35 marvellosity wrote: i'm on page 51 and the lynch on calix seems fine, gonna chill my vote on bats though.
good chance maf maf i suppose Really? Why do you think Calix is maf? thought HF had a compelling post, can't now remember what it said. some 3 point thing something about being around a lot but only being reactive particularly. but vote bats. It was when she said that I could be mafia if Bats is mafia even though I had pushed JAT who she had associated with Bats.
I think she's given quite reasonable explanations for it.
|
On October 06 2016 03:44 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:43 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:40 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:38 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:35 marvellosity wrote: i'm on page 51 and the lynch on calix seems fine, gonna chill my vote on bats though.
good chance maf maf i suppose Really? Why do you think Calix is maf? thought HF had a compelling post, can't now remember what it said. some 3 point thing something about being around a lot but only being reactive particularly. but vote bats. It was when she said that I could be mafia if Bats is mafia even though I had pushed JAT who she had associated with Bats. I think she's given quite reasonable explanations for it. then vote bats Make a case?
|
If you can write a convincing case then I will vote Bats.
|
On October 06 2016 03:47 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:46 Grackaroni wrote: If you can write a convincing case then I will vote Bats. Traitor!!!! Don't worry, his case was unconvincing.
|
On October 06 2016 03:49 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:49 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:47 Koshi wrote:On October 06 2016 03:46 Grackaroni wrote: If you can write a convincing case then I will vote Bats. Traitor!!!! Don't worry, his case was unconvincing. how is it? Because I think JAT may be more guilty of politician posts than Batsnacks. He actually writes out reasons for why someone is playing normally and his scum reads ended up being all omgus.
Batsnacks at least came up with a unique point on Damdred.
|
On October 06 2016 03:52 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:51 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:49 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:49 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:47 Koshi wrote:On October 06 2016 03:46 Grackaroni wrote: If you can write a convincing case then I will vote Bats. Traitor!!!! Don't worry, his case was unconvincing. how is it? Because I think JAT may be more guilty of politician posts than Batsnacks. He actually writes out reasons for why someone is playing normally and his scum reads ended up being all omgus. Batsnacks at least came up with a unique point on Damdred. okay but jat does that as both alignments and bat doesn't so....... I'm not all that familiar with Batsnacks' scum play. Actually isn't he usually a trollish player?
|
Maybe Batsnacks is the right lynch.
|
On October 06 2016 03:54 Calix wrote: We've had this point brought up by JAT ages ago, Grack. Didn't you comment on that yourself? lol
Why are you questioning this now when you know the answer? I don't think I have.
|
On October 06 2016 03:54 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:53 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:52 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:51 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:49 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:49 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:47 Koshi wrote:On October 06 2016 03:46 Grackaroni wrote: If you can write a convincing case then I will vote Bats. Traitor!!!! Don't worry, his case was unconvincing. how is it? Because I think JAT may be more guilty of politician posts than Batsnacks. He actually writes out reasons for why someone is playing normally and his scum reads ended up being all omgus. Batsnacks at least came up with a unique point on Damdred. okay but jat does that as both alignments and bat doesn't so....... I'm not all that familiar with Batsnacks' scum play. Actually isn't he usually a trollish player? just look in the database that's what i did. that's when i voted him, directly after i did that i mean if my case isn't convincing enough on its own and you cba to do that, then meh :> The process begins! He has a hundred percent death rate as mafia.
|
On October 06 2016 03:58 Calix wrote:Pretty sure you did, my dear Grack. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 16:09 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 16:05 Holyflare wrote: Did someone say mafia batsnacks was more serious? That was JAT when he was arguing that batsnacks wasn't being too serious this game. Show nested quote +On October 05 2016 16:11 Grackaroni wrote:On October 05 2016 16:10 Holyflare wrote: Why do i think the complete opposite then? Batsnacks looks like a complete emotionless robot that posts reads and has no passion behind them. That's what Calix said in response. Oh yeah. I know what JAT has said in this game but I have no idea whether it's true. He also said Superbia's scum meta looks like it does this game and I haven't gotten around to looking yet.
|
On October 06 2016 04:00 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2016 03:58 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:54 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:53 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:52 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:51 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:49 marvellosity wrote:On October 06 2016 03:49 Grackaroni wrote:On October 06 2016 03:47 Koshi wrote:On October 06 2016 03:46 Grackaroni wrote: If you can write a convincing case then I will vote Bats. Traitor!!!! Don't worry, his case was unconvincing. how is it? Because I think JAT may be more guilty of politician posts than Batsnacks. He actually writes out reasons for why someone is playing normally and his scum reads ended up being all omgus. Batsnacks at least came up with a unique point on Damdred. okay but jat does that as both alignments and bat doesn't so....... I'm not all that familiar with Batsnacks' scum play. Actually isn't he usually a trollish player? just look in the database that's what i did. that's when i voted him, directly after i did that i mean if my case isn't convincing enough on its own and you cba to do that, then meh :> The process begins! He has a hundred percent death rate as mafia. like if you don't think he's the best lynch after you've done that, then fair enough. not here to bully votes ^^ Well, I am.
|
We could always pile on JAT too.
|
I hate that not defending yourself is now considered townie behavior.
|
|
|
|