|
ehh I have a problem with these two posts.
On February 16 2016 09:27 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 09:17 Trfel wrote:Shapelog, why do you not care that I caught mafia I am actually writing a reply to your questions Lol. But about Eden, tbh not a whole lot to go off of (I mean like 4 posts not counting the miller softclaim joke). In those two posts: Set up speculation, Rosukl Town read, Asking if people abject to Miller claiming, Miller claiming. Like why would mafia push Miller claiming AND while speculating that a DT is in a game?
On February 16 2016 23:19 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Sick Mafia Stat that while it has not…] + OK so this is great. I was reading R-Girl's Filter and This pop into my head. This is comptlely Off topic and I highly suggest to you to NOT reply to this. IT will clog up the thread and my filter with useless crap. Only thing worth noting is the end.
SUPPOSE THAT THE MILLERS are NOT Aware. Cheekey right? I mean we have had everyone post and no one claimed. What if mafia posts a list like Eden's. Saying the Millers sound aware (while knowing somehow either by mafia knowledge or host question). and THEN having their partner claim Miller? Sure, they might run into problems later on. But that would be a amazing play.
IMPORTANT INFO So, While I am all for Millers to claim if they are aware. I think we need to be careful since we do not actually know if Millers are really Millers. And if we have a DT, they can not check. Further more, we need to see if there is any associative behavior with the person who claims Miller and with people like Eden who assumes Millers are aware.
the first one shows meaningful insight into why edens "setup speculation" wasn't scummy. This makes me think that he has obviously thought about what eden is saying and realised millers are self aware.
then the second post he suddenly backtracks and says a bunch of words about not much. I know dumbtells almost always come from town and mafia hardly ever fake them but this isn't really a dumbtell because it isnt about the mafia roles. Like I don't get how the same person wrote these two posts. Scum lean on Shape
|
Hi shape
It is actually hard because yes i still don't see how you could make both of those posts but I don't see why you do it as mafia. Dumbtell obviously but that is jsut a MEH reason. I also get the same kinda vibe rsoul said she got where you seem like "fake happy" but that might just be you and im far too lazy to look at your other games to see if that's true.
Some people want to lynch shining. What is your opinion on that shape?
|
yeah im also leaving now but will be around before deadline
|
last few pages from shape seem really really scummmy. Especially this
On February 18 2016 03:20 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 03:19 nooniansoong wrote: um shape why are you voting trfel for a joke...? Because I am tired of voting off GB L33t. But Srs. he is prob mafia.
I'm not sure if he is reffering to trefel or GB here im fairly sure it's trefel but he doesn't bring it up again when he should 100% be trying to push a counter wagon especially if someone is "prob mafia". I get that he also scumreads SL but it just seemed like the easy way out and he ahsn't explained this read at all.
##Vote Shapelog
Also trefel it might not be important now but how do you think that no one responds to you when you point out my early questions went nowhere and correctly idenify this as something I do as scum. Makes me feel that there is scum in people that are more familiar to me and are resigned to not lynching me. Is this a bad assumption?
|
On February 18 2016 04:10 Shapelog wrote: Can I Explain it? if this is directed towards me yes please do.
Also the people who are voting SL did you read all his posts? There seems to be an important one you need to call BS on before you vote him.
|
On February 18 2016 04:12 Trfel wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 04:07 Breshke wrote:last few pages from shape seem really really scummmy. Especially this On February 18 2016 03:20 Shapelog wrote:On February 18 2016 03:19 nooniansoong wrote: um shape why are you voting trfel for a joke...? Because I am tired of voting off GB L33t. But Srs. he is prob mafia. I'm not sure if he is reffering to trefel or GB here im fairly sure it's trefel but he doesn't bring it up again when he should 100% be trying to push a counter wagon especially if someone is "prob mafia". I get that he also scumreads SL but it just seemed like the easy way out and he ahsn't explained this read at all. ##Vote ShapelogAlso trefel it might not be important now but how do you think that no one responds to you when you point out my early questions went nowhere and correctly idenify this as something I do as scum. Makes me feel that there is scum in people that are more familiar to me and are resigned to not lynching me. Is this a bad assumption? I mean, maybe you're right. Part of the problem is that it's extremely subjective, while I personally feel that that initial question went nowhere, I can see how people would feel that it really did have a point behind it. I can also see how people wouldn't care enough to respond and say so, unfortunately. I think it's probably more of people just not wanting to talk about you, other than maybe Palmar, anyway. I guess it would make sense for scum to push you more than they have, assuming you are town, but I'm not yet sure what that means.
Mmm I understand what you are saying. Will backburner this for later probably
|
On February 18 2016 04:12 Shapelog wrote: Also, As much as it scummy to do this, How do i not get ML today?
explain that post i pointed out and why the person you were reffering to is "probs mafia"
Start actually pushing someone and saying why not just trying to find a good counterwagon
|
On February 18 2016 04:18 sicklucker wrote: i really dont have the energy to try to figure out a new enigma that is shapelog. can we lynch palmar or tumble
Can you explain what you mean by new enigma
|
On February 18 2016 04:21 sicklucker wrote: breske what were my bs posts no one noticed. the part where im like I WONT BE HERE TORMORoW DO I HAVE TO CLAIM NOW softs? I never said they were BS i said i don't see how people were voting you without saying those posts were BS.
Did TT's vote come before or after you made that post where you quoted three of your own? I understand GB because he probably hasn't read it. Honestly thought more people were voting you
On February 18 2016 04:20 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 04:18 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 04:18 sicklucker wrote: i really dont have the energy to try to figure out a new enigma that is shapelog. can we lynch palmar or tumble Can you explain what you mean by new enigma a magicly wild sexy wilderbeast im too tired to decipher + Show Spoiler +im too tired to figure out a new person of his volumn and randomness
this is weird coming from you since you normally would just not care since you dont like D1 right?
|
On February 18 2016 04:52 Shapelog wrote: Is everyone in agreement with Kush?
no, its my opinon that you don't claim what blue you are
|
Shape post your read post
|
On February 18 2016 04:58 Trfel wrote: No don't kill Shapelog
I think kill sicklucker for being willing to kill Shapelog after earlier saying that he wanted to be safe and not kill power roles
also he literally just said he didnt want to work out shape because he was an enigma, shape then claims blue and now he says he will risk it.
Sl did claim blue also though
|
Shape where is your reads post? Even if it isn't finished can you please post it?
|
On February 18 2016 05:00 nooniansoong wrote: Fine let's switch to GB. I still think shape should claim, because we won't know if there is 2 or 3 prs depending on how many mafia prs there are. So if he claims that makes his claim more easily verifiable or falsifiable.
So say he claims vet? Then what?
|
On February 17 2016 22:57 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2016 11:42 sicklucker wrote:On February 17 2016 11:33 Tumblewood wrote: Pretend I quoted rsoul's question. At the beginning of the game (aka when I made that post) the active people (rsoul, Trfel, Eden, kush, TT, SL, Shape, Breshke) were about equally active, and few of their posts at the time provide anything of substance. Since then, rsoul, kush, and TT have taken on a role of facilitation-- that is, making sure the game progresses. I think that mafia are more content just to let this day pass slowly and quietly and would not actively try to prevent that. In mafia theres also a thing called poweroles. When one receives a powerole they want to fly under the radar Show nested quote +On February 17 2016 17:21 sicklucker wrote: little chance ill be here for deadline tbh. so if im getting lynched let me know soon for obvious reasons Show nested quote +On February 17 2016 17:23 sicklucker wrote: its just a general good rule of thumb to not lynch people afk at deadline on day 1 I made all these posts and people are probably still trying to lynch me. I expect to return to the thread later dead one way or the other. gl with that I have no time today
SL confirm this was a blueclaim. There is no point not talking about it
|
On February 18 2016 05:04 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Shapelog, claim your role
No stop. Why does everyone want him to claim his role? How is that the good play GB unless you are very sure he is mafia.
SHape said he was working on a reads list. If you think he is fake claiming it is also very likely he has no such reads list. Shouldn't this be a higher priority for him to reply to.
|
On February 18 2016 05:06 sicklucker wrote: ok breske is role hunting now nice
please, we literally were talking about this before you claimed blue people want to lynch you and dont understand that you claimed blue.
|
On February 18 2016 05:07 nooniansoong wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:04 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:00 nooniansoong wrote: Fine let's switch to GB. I still think shape should claim, because we won't know if there is 2 or 3 prs depending on how many mafia prs there are. So if he claims that makes his claim more easily verifiable or falsifiable. So say he claims vet? Then what? That's worst case scenario if he's scum and best case scenario if he's actually a pr. If he claims vet then we know he's lying if someone else claims vet. We know he's probably lying if there ends up being too many prs. Or we lynch him if he looks scummy enough after the reads list or another day, because his role is useless anyway.
Yeah so why cant we lynch someone else then he claims his role tomorrow when we can actually verify what his power has done.
|
Like I don't hate that reads list from shape, not to say i agree with it and think a lot of it is weak reasoning but it is enough for me to show that as scum he wasnt just relying on his fake claim to get through the lynch and makes me sure that he doesn't claim here.
I have problems with SL but it is better I talk about it D2
I have no idea who we lynch but im fairly sure it will be one of the less active players.
|
On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote: Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options.
Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out.
|
|
|
|