On May 12 2015 00:36 Palmar wrote:
I have found 3 people that call me palmer consistently.
geript, sicklucker, tehpoofter.
I have found 3 people that call me palmer consistently.
geript, sicklucker, tehpoofter.
all my money on geript
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 00:36 Palmar wrote: I have found 3 people that call me palmer consistently. geript, sicklucker, tehpoofter. all my money on geript | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 01:43 justanothertownie wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 01:41 Damdred wrote: Can we not policy lynch vivax today XD maybe a day vig could just take him out lol. I agree roughly that the pregame where BM gave his posts up and didn't do much is kinda meh. It helped me immensely at that juncture though. As such the excuse that BM used to fire the nuke isn't necessarily the least believable thing I've ever read. It's based on meta yes but I didn't feel it was horrible, it could of led to some really useful information and its a pity that it didn't. (10) Vivax is certainly not a policy lynch. Not sure how you can say BM is a policy lynch when he's done actual really scummy stuff and Vivax isn't (although I do agree) when he hasn't posted anything at all | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 01:59 Bill Murray wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 01:54 Half the Sky wrote: 14/60 On May 12 2015 01:50 Bill Murray wrote: Half the Sky you say I listed you at random when you clearly posted this earlier: So I'm curious to see why he has BM in one category versus Bats/BH in a worse category. Not differentiating is either him making a list post to get out of determining people's alignment (and I hear he doesn't play as scum) or a double standard, either of which look scummy. I know I had you at null BM. In reference to the quote you posted, I wasn't scumreading you for that. I was scumreading Yamato for that. On May 11 2015 02:38 Half the Sky wrote: 4/10 [...] Things that jumped out at me: Yamato's list post - Bats/BH/Bill Murray all fall into the category (null so far) of having posted much about nothing, nothing in terms of figuring out people's alignment. So I'm curious to see why he has BM in one category versus Bats/BH in a worse category. Not differentiating is either him making a list post to get out of determining people's alignment (and I hear he doesn't play as scum) or a double standard, either of which look scummy. At no point did I scumread you pre-game. Clearly you need to read more carefully or read to begin with :/ yeah it was a mistake i wasnt even wagonning talkingdead for the record i cant be the leading votegetter when I fire a nuke or it doesnt work i dont know why my nuke @ marv isnt working I think the moderator is messed up I even doublechecked my role PM.... OH WELL but back on topic I dont really read into you or talkingdead talking about me as being negative I see you all as likely town. Marv is probably scum for the way that he got a wagon on me when I'm an obvious blue to him. Look who Marv/Palmar are pushing... me and blazinghand... but they are FoSing blazinghand and voting me... Go figure. Jeep tell 101. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/484076-assassination-mafia?page=22#430 It got shot down bro. You're not reading the thread. I have no idea what you're saying about BlazingHand. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 08:08 GlowingBear wrote: Oh boy. Kelsen. BH IS up for the lynch today. Oh boy. Oh. Boy. no he isn't. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 09:13 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 09:09 Trfel wrote: Actually, now that I think about it again, maybe I could still lynch Bill Murray.... That's fine and all, but none of the reasons you posted are conclusive for a player like BM. It is a policy lynch, plain and simple. I generally don't do policy lynches. you're not a good enough player to understand what a policy lynch is | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 18:51 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 18:44 marvellosity wrote: On May 12 2015 09:13 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 09:09 Trfel wrote: Actually, now that I think about it again, maybe I could still lynch Bill Murray.... That's fine and all, but none of the reasons you posted are conclusive for a player like BM. It is a policy lynch, plain and simple. I generally don't do policy lynches. you're not a good enough player to understand what a policy lynch is are you going to be useful, or just sit on a shitty lynch? it's an excellent lynch, you're just too bad to get it | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
Three people who I think are good lynches, other than BM: Vivax - somehow when I read his posts last night they didn't seem *too* uninteresting. So I was left feeling a little town from it. But in the end, they led nowhere, game has been going on quite a while now, not enough to hang my hat on Oats - promised GB he'd try properly this game. I don't really remember his posts. Xatalos - he's boring. that's enough. I'm not very sure about my earlier Onegu read. I read Onegu + rsoultin arguing last night when I was pretty baked and I couldn't work out what the fuck was going on. Anyone have any bright insights? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 18:55 yamato77 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 18:52 marvellosity wrote: On May 12 2015 18:51 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 18:44 marvellosity wrote: On May 12 2015 09:13 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 09:09 Trfel wrote: Actually, now that I think about it again, maybe I could still lynch Bill Murray.... That's fine and all, but none of the reasons you posted are conclusive for a player like BM. It is a policy lynch, plain and simple. I generally don't do policy lynches. you're not a good enough player to understand what a policy lynch is are you going to be useful, or just sit on a shitty lynch? it's an excellent lynch, you're just too bad to get it do you have any thoughts on anything BM has posted since he nuked you, or are you just salty? if by "salty" you mean "trying to lynch mafia" then yes, I am salty. I've read everything up to the start of p47 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:00 TalkingDead wrote: Yes. Can we add RebirthofLegend to said list? We can, ish, but I think that verges a little more into policy, maybe. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:10 TalkingDead wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 19:01 marvellosity wrote: On May 12 2015 19:00 TalkingDead wrote: Yes. Can we add RebirthofLegend to said list? We can, ish, but I think that verges a little more into policy, maybe. Is it really a policy lynch to kill people who have 8 posts about nothing interesting that offer nothing of note and more than likely will continue said trend? Because I call that modus operandi. He's a far worse offender than Palmer. At least Yamato has some interesting posts. yes, because you have to use the meta comparisons. Vivax? Very rarely a do-nothing shitter as town. Can't even remember a time, but i'm sure there might have been Palmar? Long history of doing nothing in many games RoL? As far as I'm aware (and as he himself claims) he can be pretty fucking lazy at the best of times so if i want to lynch one of the 3, it's obvious what the better lynch is (imo) yamato? (as you mentioned him) - doing things with opinions. also not afraid to ruffle me | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:21 TalkingDead wrote: Did Bill Murray play in Nuclear Winter? The nuke game that Ace rolled scum in. I am using 1.67% of my day's posts to say no, he didn't, and look at the database you lazy lazy fucker | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:28 TalkingDead wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 19:19 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 19:12 TalkingDead wrote: On May 12 2015 19:06 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 19:05 marvellosity wrote: Although (p48) BM is still trying surprisingly harder than he might if he were mafia. And with longer posts than usual too. meh it is the argument but his reads are unreasonable and too erratic, really going to look at how he played in boardwalk I've looked at it. Significantly less effort. Very short posts. Mostly careless. That said, the situations aren't really comparable in any realistic way. bleh like I said, BM is just not that easy to read this game Yah, but do you really want to hear people repeat the argument for the next four phases? Can't you at least consider the policy lynch of "killing him now will annoy me less that having to listen retards talk about him constantly for couple of days"? I'd imagine there's some major appeal for you there. This is a kinda similar argument to what i had in my head, which was: if we don't lynch him now, we're never gonna lynch him. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:32 TalkingDead wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 19:30 marvellosity wrote: On May 12 2015 19:28 TalkingDead wrote: On May 12 2015 19:19 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 19:12 TalkingDead wrote: On May 12 2015 19:06 yamato77 wrote: On May 12 2015 19:05 marvellosity wrote: Although (p48) BM is still trying surprisingly harder than he might if he were mafia. And with longer posts than usual too. meh it is the argument but his reads are unreasonable and too erratic, really going to look at how he played in boardwalk I've looked at it. Significantly less effort. Very short posts. Mostly careless. That said, the situations aren't really comparable in any realistic way. bleh like I said, BM is just not that easy to read this game Yah, but do you really want to hear people repeat the argument for the next four phases? Can't you at least consider the policy lynch of "killing him now will annoy me less that having to listen retards talk about him constantly for couple of days"? I'd imagine there's some major appeal for you there. This is a kinda similar argument to what i had in my head, which was: if we don't lynch him now, we're never gonna lynch him. So you're saying I can read your mind... Do tell me more. if you didn't just get naked, you can't read my mind | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:36 sandroba wrote: @marv I noticed a certain absence of stutters in your proposed lynches and would like to know why that is. i just forgot about him. also he doesn't have the meta element that usually tips a low postcount/trying player into being a good/bad lynch. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On May 12 2015 19:41 sandroba wrote: Show nested quote + On May 12 2015 04:24 sandroba wrote: I really don't like jat, he feels very different from the town games I've played with him. He doesn't engage people giving him grief trying to figure out their alignment, but instead comes off as dismissive and angry. He also feels very detached from the game, posting statements instead of the usual inquiries and info digging that I normally see from town jat. I don't think the BM lynch is going to be all that productive regarding info, but he seems to be a problem that needs to be dealt with sooner or later because suspicion will always be around him, especially if marv ends up not flipping scum, so I wouldn't mind a dayvigi dealing with him today. Regarding Vivax I undertand the suspicion prior to him posting, but now that it started I don't see any reason in particular for the number of scum reads he is getting. Between BM and jat I think there is no reason to consider a vivax lynch today so far. Stutters on the other hand is someone that came in late that I find much more suspicous. He entered the thread and only commented on the most recent thing that happened, had no unique perspective or orignal read, just added pretty bland noncommittal statements. I would be much more inclined to lynch into those 3. I changed my mind about jat, but don't you agree with my accessment of vivax and stutters? I think that if you look how both entered the thread and started posting you will see a clear difference. no, I don't agree. Pretty much based on my experience with them both. Stutters has historically been pretty lurky no matter his alignment, and actually I'm not that sure how to read him. Like I can't disagree with what you said on Stutters, but I don't know if it's scummy for him. Vivax I am used to much much more. He struggles to play as mafia. He just came off a mafia game so I'd expect his motivation to play scum again to be pretty low, and I'd expect his motivation to be town again to be pretty high. The best you can say for Vivax is that the few posts he've made have been ok, and that falls a long way short of town-expectation levels and it's in-line with mafia-expectation levels | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
May 12 2015 13:06 GMT
#1040
| ||
| ||
Next event in 7h 40m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations |
Kung Fu Cup
ESL Pro Tour
ESL Pro Tour
PassionCraft
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs Soulkey
AfreecaTV Pro Series
Reynor vs Cure
[ Show More ] ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
|
|