|
I agree with austin, we shouldn't lynch vivax. His reaction to gumshoe claim looked indeed very townie. I'd like to add that he kind of offered kush a way out by enticing to claim that his power was 1-shot. He cares about kush being converted or not in the future. Also I'm not convinced by kita case, the same way I was not convinced by his case on rayn yesterday.
I believe Vivax is town, don't lynch a townie please !
|
I'd lynch Toad but I don't mind to consolidate on Hopeless if it can avoid Vivax lynch. That's my position for today
|
On April 04 2014 04:17 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:12 Djodref wrote: I agree with austin, we shouldn't lynch vivax. His reaction to gumshoe claim looked indeed very townie. I'd like to add that he kind of offered kush a way out by enticing to claim that his power was 1-shot. He cares about kush being converted or not in the future. Also I'm not convinced by kita case, the same way I was not convinced by his case on rayn yesterday.
I believe Vivax is town, don't lynch a townie please ! What bits of the reaction look very townie to you? HAHA THIS IS THE AGREEING WITH AUSTIN TEST. DO YOU PASS?
This one is my favorite. It's just after Vivax realized the claim was fake. It's very spontaneous and I don't imagine scum write something like this at a moment like that. As scum, I think it was a WTF moment, not a LOL moment.
On April 03 2014 04:33 Vivax wrote: Lol gumshoe you're so fucked
Also, as I said in my post, Vivax was trying to offer kush a way-out.
On April 03 2014 05:03 Vivax wrote: Fuck's sake. Kush, is it a 1-shot-ability?
On April 03 2014 05:06 Vivax wrote: Kush u genius say it's one-shot -.-
Vivax cares, Vivax is likely to be town.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On April 04 2014 04:25 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:24 Djodref wrote:On April 04 2014 04:17 austinmcc wrote:On April 04 2014 04:12 Djodref wrote: I agree with austin, we shouldn't lynch vivax. His reaction to gumshoe claim looked indeed very townie. I'd like to add that he kind of offered kush a way out by enticing to claim that his power was 1-shot. He cares about kush being converted or not in the future. Also I'm not convinced by kita case, the same way I was not convinced by his case on rayn yesterday.
I believe Vivax is town, don't lynch a townie please ! What bits of the reaction look very townie to you? HAHA THIS IS THE AGREEING WITH AUSTIN TEST. DO YOU PASS? This one is my favorite. It's just after Vivax realized the claim was fake. It's very spontaneous and I don't imagine scum write something like this at a moment like that. As scum, I think it was a WTF moment, not a LOL moment. On April 03 2014 04:33 Vivax wrote: Lol gumshoe you're so fucked Also, as I said in my post, Vivax was trying to offer kush a way-out. On April 03 2014 05:03 Vivax wrote: Fuck's sake. Kush, is it a 1-shot-ability? On April 03 2014 05:06 Vivax wrote: Kush u genius say it's one-shot -.- Vivax cares, Vivax is likely to be town.
Alternatively Vivax wants to know if he should convert Kush?
@Hopeless
I don't think mafia would be that obvious. I liked Vivax explanations on this here.
On April 03 2014 05:48 Vivax wrote:What's this going to be? If scum assumes you aren't just 1-shot they convert you and have a vig. Had you thought a little more you would have said you were one-shot. But maybe you want to be converted, fuck knows. I for one know that past this day you will have to use your powers much more in accordance with town as to get away that possibility, ie vigs out of the blue or stuff like that are a reason to lynch you.
Vivax cares if one power roles is going to get converted or not. I feel he really wanted kush to claim 1-shot. And now he resents kush for not doing it, and being a potential conversion for the mafia.
|
@ Hopeless
Why did you start to vote Vivax with opportunistic posturing ? You didn't believe in Toad lynch ?
|
On April 04 2014 04:44 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:43 Djodref wrote: @ Hopeless
Why did you start to vote Vivax with opportunistic posturing ? You didn't believe in Toad lynch ? I didnt think Toad would get lynched. At this point I'm probaly gonna get lynched.
Are you town ? Do you have anything to claim ? I'm going to vote you. This is your last chance to change my mind.
|
lol thrawn, you wanna lynch kita instead ?
|
Hey, kita ! I don't want yesterday to happen again, I mean I don't want Vivax to be lynch and the rest of the voters to be spread on other targets. Because I think he is town. I don't feel like I have enough traction to lynch Toad, so shall we reach a consensus and lynch Hopeless instead today ? I think there is a good momentum to consolidate on Hopeless now !
|
|
On April 04 2014 04:57 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 04:48 Djodref wrote:On April 04 2014 04:44 Hopeless1der wrote:On April 04 2014 04:43 Djodref wrote: @ Hopeless
Why did you start to vote Vivax with opportunistic posturing ? You didn't believe in Toad lynch ? I didnt think Toad would get lynched. At this point I'm probaly gonna get lynched. Are you town ? Do you have anything to claim ? I'm going to vote you. This is your last chance to change my mind. Here's the real reason i wanted ot lynch vivax: I'm a modified watcher A targetted B Vivax Targetted B I know the role name of A. I do not actually know who A is or who A targetted.
I don't understand how your power can be useful... You watched Vivax yesterday and you get the name of the guy who is targeting the same guy as Vivax ? Did you breadcrumb anything ? Why do you think Vivax is maf given your results ?
|
Hey Vivax, did you target anyone yesterday ?
|
Mmm, maybe we should wait for the full role from Hopeless first.
|
On April 04 2014 05:06 Vivax wrote: Guys, let's get back to business for a moment while hopeless thinks what he should write. We need a lynch, hopeless is out of question for today imo. Kita or Toad pick one.
Why would he be out of the question ?
|
wow thrawn ! What's the ninja vote on kita ?
|
On April 04 2014 05:16 JarJarDrinks wrote: Is it implying that vivax and rose targetted the same person?
Yeah, that's exactly what he says
|
It doesn't make any sense... My vote stays where it is
|
On April 04 2014 05:20 JarJarDrinks wrote: Actually vivax already admitted to targetting someone. I vote that he says who it was.
thoughts?
Well, if you both targeted the same person, Hopeless i somehow cleared, if you didn't, we can lynch him without remorse. But it's Vivax decision at the end. Hopeless, did you hint somewhere in your filter that your power sucked ?
|
Shall we lynch Toad then ? I doubt scum would have such a poor fakeclaim...
|
On April 04 2014 05:24 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 05:18 JarJarDrinks wrote: K, I'm Rose. Vivax did you target someone? awww, I found my daughter :3
And is this a claim as well ? Isn't the father of Rose supposed to be dead ?
|
On April 04 2014 05:30 JarJarDrinks wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 05:23 Djodref wrote:On April 04 2014 05:20 JarJarDrinks wrote: Actually vivax already admitted to targetting someone. I vote that he says who it was.
thoughts? Well, if you both targeted the same person, Hopeless i somehow cleared, if you didn't, we can lynch him without remorse. But it's Vivax decision at the end. You seem really confident that Vivax and I are both town.
Well, you just have to be both not scum and if you claim your targets together Hopeless is cleared. I don't believe both of you are scum.
|
|
|
|