|
On April 23 2013 06:53 kushm4sta wrote: lurking on phone. rather kill yamato oats is just really inactive so I can't get a good read.
he was active enough. Read Vivax's case. Both posts on this page are pretty damning.
|
On April 23 2013 07:58 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 19:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: First of all:
##Unvote: Bill Murray I really hate your play. I agree with BC you should be vigged asap.
well, you can get over it. you're a high filutin ignoramous that thinks he's breakthrough, and liberal so what if i dont care the only people who care about my revolutionary town techniques are mafia, or Ace. He seems to be avoiding the spotlight this game, though, so I'm going to let him be. He might bag us ~3 mafia before it's all over.
|
could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day?
|
I think Oats is definite scum, yamato likely scum. But someone being useless is worth lynching. Too bad Town has gimped Vigis so we're gonna waste time getting rid of them both.
|
On April 23 2013 08:47 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 08:39 Ace wrote: could it be that yamato and Oats are both Scum but Oats has a great role so they want him to live for one day? hmmm. It might be too late for a shift, but this logic is definitely something that I wouldn't mind a concerted effort in analyzing... Scum have that sort of mindset... but what if Oats is an offering? That would look bad on Vivax, then!
how would that look bad on Vivax?
|
Thanks for the suggestion Bill. Make sure everyone who posts in this thread has correct grammar.
|
but you've got no credibility yamato. If VE is scum - tough shit. You've played bad enough that your words carry no weight and screaming about it isn't moving the needle towards his lynch. Stop trying to derail the wagon and at least vote for Oats.
|
##vote Oatsmaster
Think he's the better lynch looking at Vivax's list. Too many people prefer Oats but haven't changed to it so I will do so. yamato just being useless, eventual vigi bait.
|
Pretty sure that response from Oats seals the deal. For the people that were waffling on him according to Vivax's list I think it's time to vote now.
|
On April 23 2013 09:18 Vivax wrote: Vivax → Case Ace → prefers Oats, initially pushed yamato CC → announces to look through yamato and Oats VE → Would get behind Oats lynch Kush → prefers yamato Giyga → Ask Oats question about earlier vote against him OO → Prefers yamato Rayn → Prefers oats Kush → Changes mind to lynching Oats Palmar → Could do Oats. Also, VE is scum. Giyga → Announces delay in looking through them WoS → Says VE is scum, mentions something scummy about Oats. Worried about Oats posting something about yamato Yamato → Said Oats could be scum earlier, VE IS SCUM but pops in and says BC and Ace could both be mafia. Bleh. Getmoript → votes yamato BM → Votes yamato TRN → Votes yamato for martyring Giyga → Prefers Oats WoS → Claims to prefer Oats. Kush → Actual change of vote to Oats
Ones in bold need to follow through and vote for Oats.
|
@TRN: both are still scummy, just that one is more so than the other. Definite Scum vs probable scum at this point.
|
On April 23 2013 11:54 getmoript wrote: So you voted for a town read when you got mad. Are you serious? I can't even keep a straight face right now considering how fucking hilarious of an excuse that is.
the more he talks the more hilarious he gets
|
On April 23 2013 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
Because I already said enough about it, and I wanted to get a bandwagon rolling on ace.
|
On April 24 2013 04:53 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2013 04:01 yamato77 wrote: So why didn't we lynch BC?
And why did Vivax apparently post an intentionally misleading votecount?
And why did people not listen to me and not hammer Oats?
And why did Clarity apparently not care that town was lynching someone he didn't want to lynch?
And why did no one decide to listen to the only person who gave a fuck about who we were lynching yesterday?
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I didn't not want to lynch him either. It didn't feel right but as hopeless pointed out in the face of dying he was just still being trolly.... you don't do that as town.. Yamato why were you so certain that oats was town, I think you were the only one. It wasn't that you were explaining how he was a bad lynch, you were saying HE IS TOWN OMG IDIOTS. What made you so sure?
because he is scum. Unfortunate that Oats flipped Town but the case against him was solid. Tomorrow we go back to the original wagon on yamato.
|
damn we shoulda lynched this dude and not Oats - at least he was actually funny. yamato is corny as hell.
|
On April 24 2013 17:32 yamato77 wrote: He was after TRN, which he later dropped, and rightly so. His case was meh, but his conclusion that TRN was likely town is not one I would see a mafia in Sharrant's position make.
His read on geript seems genuine. Despite the claim, he finds geript scummy, but can't lynch him because of the sentiment that he's town for the host interaction.
I like his read on you and how he handled it. I like how he interacted with BM, it seemed honest and a real product of frustration.
He also has a scumread on Hopeless. I haven't personally looked at Hopeless, but that's another point in his favor.
In the time he has been here, I like Sharrant's contributions, even if he may be wrong about some things.
???
If Sharrant is Scum and TRN isn't then what other conclusion is he going to make? Like seriously, I'd be interested to know because there aren't many.
The part in red is just ridiculous.
|
@rayne: yamato is doing a lot of talking for Sharrant which amazes me, because he somehow knows this guy is def Town and knows his thought process. Until Sharrant shows up you're talking to the wrong guy. He's talking nonsense.
|
On April 24 2013 17:36 yamato77 wrote: Rayn specifically asked who else Sharrant had been after, so I discussed it in those terms. You're just as bad as BC.
and like an idiot you just made some bullshit up. How does the read Sharrant gave "in his position" nullify a Scum read? If you're going to make statements at least qualify them with some context.
|
On April 24 2013 17:40 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2013 17:35 Ace wrote:On April 24 2013 17:32 yamato77 wrote: He was after TRN, which he later dropped, and rightly so. His case was meh, but his conclusion that TRN was likely town is not one I would see a mafia in Sharrant's position make.
His read on geript seems genuine. Despite the claim, he finds geript scummy, but can't lynch him because of the sentiment that he's town for the host interaction.
I like his read on you and how he handled it. I like how he interacted with BM, it seemed honest and a real product of frustration.
He also has a scumread on Hopeless. I haven't personally looked at Hopeless, but that's another point in his favor.
In the time he has been here, I like Sharrant's contributions, even if he may be wrong about some things. ??? If Sharrant is Scum and TRN isn't then what other conclusion is he going to make? Like seriously, I'd be interested to know because there aren't many. The part in red is just ridiculous. Furthermore, I've seen plenty of mafia tunnel an unpopular scumread to look original. Happens all the time. I rarely see mafia back down from an early read, and even if they do, I even more rarely actually say that person is likely town and close the door on lynching them. That's not a mafia mentality. The part in red is not ridiculous when we're discussing the NUMBER OF SHARRANTS READS. No matter whether I agree with him or not, his read on Hopeless seems genuine and not bullshit.
Ok, and I've seen plenty of mafia players back off their original reads to look like they aren't tunneling. Good, now that we've got the made up hypotheticals out of the way lets get back to this game.
You stated that if Sharrant was Scum, him calling TRN town eventually in his current position doesn't make sense. What position was Sharrant in? Was he in danger of being lynched? No - so how can you really glean anything from what he says about TRN's alignment at the moment? Your post screams you automatically assumed his alignment is Town and then worked backwards. If you don't know Sharrant's alignment your entire example fails hard.
Making a case on hopeless1nder doesn't mean anything. I mean you didn't even point out what about the case was rock solid, you just said "yea that's a point in his favor". That's utter bs.
|
On April 24 2013 17:41 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2013 17:39 Ace wrote:On April 24 2013 17:36 yamato77 wrote: Rayn specifically asked who else Sharrant had been after, so I discussed it in those terms. You're just as bad as BC. and like an idiot you just made some bullshit up. How does the read Sharrant gave "in his position" nullify a Scum read? If you're going to make statements at least qualify them with some context. What are you talking about? I never said anything about "nullifying a scum read". Ace, what the fuck?
nullifying a scum read = seeing Sharrant as Town from now on.
|
|
|
|