Personality Mafia 2 - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
You guys also seem keenly aware of my weak scum meta. Well then take advantage of it. Talk to me - either I'm town and I provide good insight as "very good town slOosh" or I'm scum and I expose my weakness and frailty as "noob sauce scum slOosh". I don't have the spread of time that I used to have, and instead have blocks, so I can't play as I usually do. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 13 2013 11:59 marvellosity wrote: the only thing that makes Foolish look a little less bad is that Ver looks bad as well. that isn't much to go on. Could you expand on this please? Are you making loose relations around vet balance? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 13 2013 13:01 Mocsta wrote: I am going back to HotS As much as I would love to support Cora right now (or Fool with his play) I think it is unwise if we all consolidate right now. In Mafia LX we did that (consolidated vote as in EVERYONE within teh first 12 hrs) and it killed off all discussions and dropped motivation levels as well. It also gave no information on mafia, because everyone voted the same person. I am struggling with this game enough as it is - because its such a shitfest; I think it would be good to avoid those type of repercussions (from consolidating early) So I would like to hear more thoughts from lurkers like Crossfire99 and Risk.Nuke in regards to their top scum reads whilst we have "spare" time. .... consolidating early is a good thing. It forces stances and focus' town attention. Trying to determine lynches last minute never works out for town. What do you make of crossfire's "will post"? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
This next point is open to anyone: BC flipped town, and is one of the best players in TL Mafia. What do you glean from his filter? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
The Plan Give various people NUKEs. Two reasons a) See how people use it. Do they treat it carefully? Do they trust it? Do they just shoot whatever? b) If multiple scum members received it, there will be information leak. They know that multiple NUKEs were given. Information pump yea? c) My last night post was designed in a way where it seemed like they had to fire the NUKEs or it blows up on themselves. Dunno how well this worked or not, but there is more information if people use it rather than if people don't. d) I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures so it doesn't matter if I hand them to scum - in fact it is better because we see true motives come out. e) (for him who knows) You town. I'm glad. I'm saying this all now because enough information has passed and we need time to properly look over it (I'm still doing it myself). p.s. Vivax please cut back on the spam. I understand where you are coming from, I really do, but it is disrupting what we are doing here. The way that marv is handling this NUKE business is one of the most sensible of the lot. Leave him alone for this day cycle please. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures. Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further. Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
Crossfire, explain clearly what you thought when you received your NUKE and the thought process leading up to deciding how to use it. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:40 slOosh wrote: If you honestly think I ruined it I apologize, but I think I brought about a wealth of useful information. I have ANTI NUKE countermeasures. Proper discussion of player behavior and actions and justification does not require me to explain further. Deciding who to lynch of course does, so I'll explain clearly at like, midday or something. I still think there is a wealth of information in how people respond to my claim. But I think you are smart enough to figure out how they might work. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
If you are concerned about consolidating votes. I can move it earlier if you think we can't do it in 24hrs. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:46 Acrofales wrote: This. Please state clearly: you can choose which nukes are going to land and kill their target? Can you cancel just one? Or any number of them? If you don't cancel, will they kill their target? lol. Talk about the people who used the NUKEs and how they responded. I already said multiple times I'll explain, so you don't have to worry about voting stuff, and I don't see how knowing more helps anyone but scum in forming their plan. Also, On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote: So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town. How does this make sense? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:47 austinmcc wrote: slOosh, if you want to go ahead and play the game, I'd like to know what you think about strongandbig. If the person who is controlling prplhz's vote is town and can say so without giving away a ton of information, then that person should state that they're responsible for the vote. Vote controlling not the most townie looking action, and this is information that would be important in figuring some things out. Politician is in no way a town move unless you intentionally take a scum's vote to decide a close lynch. Clearly the way that it was used today was not that. I'll give you a blurb on my thoughts on SnB soon but I'd rather focus on the NUKErs the NUKEees and surrounding conversation. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:52 Acrofales wrote: If yamato is scum, then why would foolish have nuked him? It would be a monumentously stupid thing to do as scum. So if yamato is scum, foolishness isn't. It really is that simple. Why wouldn't you lynch Foolishness today? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 13 2013 22:47 Acrofales wrote: So if the nuke is real, then Yamato dies at the end of the cycle. I think we should leave Foolishness for tomorrow: I see no reason for scum to nuke a scumbuddy right now. If Yamato flips red, then Foolishness is probably town. On March 13 2013 23:46 Crossfire99 wrote: ##NUKE: Foolishness I'm glad I can read the thread. People - is this a scumslip or people who can't read? | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:00 Crossfire99 wrote: Dude it's like a minute after my post. He probably didn't refresh. That makes absolutely no sense and you need to spend more time reading. There is an hour gap between the two posts, and you can't gain information by not refreshing. He assumed that Foolishness will be NUKED before it was posted that he would be NUKED. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 03:47 austinmcc wrote: slOosh, if you want to go ahead and play the game, I'd like to know what you think about strongandbig. Honestly was one of the players I put off reading because his filter is too long for close inspection. I don't like him, given that he isn't trying to figure stuff out as everyone should be. Fricken NUKEs flying around and you casually sit back and enjoy the view? For my turn I pick anyone concerning the NUKE discussion. | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:08 marvellosity wrote: how about you don't tell me how to play ever again. deal? Until slOosh explains exactly what's going in with nukes, I don't see much point in engaging with him. He's made what is quite clearly an anti-town move in giving nukes to volatile, lurky, or suspicious players. If slOosh genuinely had KP to give out, why wasn't he giving it out to his strongest townreads? I know slOosh respects my judgement, why wouldn't he give me a KP to kill mafia with? This whole plan stinks, and his inability just to say "yes" to my clarification is very concerning indeed. Guh ... fine. All the NUKES are fake. Of course if they were real KP I would give them out to my townreads cause dead scum is superior to finding scum. If the last guy doesn't believe me he can shoot me. Way to ruin another trap. I thought you'd be able to figure it out. | ||
| ||