|
On March 15 2013 11:20 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 11:19 Promethelax wrote:On March 15 2013 11:16 DarthPunk wrote:On March 15 2013 11:07 Promethelax wrote:On March 15 2013 11:02 DarthPunk wrote: Yeah I actually have to agree with VIVAX on it being doubtful that corazon would try and kill himself as scum day 2. Not only is that against every instinct you have as scum. which is generally SURVIVE! SURVIVE! But I am sure his scummer friends would have something to say about him being suicidal.
Hey oldest friend who I've missed This post is shit You add nothing at all To the Marv/fool brawl Could you give me a read list? I think yamato is town. I think marv is probably town and I am sheeping marv while I catch up. Two reads does not a list make In my little game please partake Give me reasons and reads For that I plead. Your heart I don't want to break. No. Because I don't have any apart from those, and I'm not 100% on marv as it is. I am not going to fake some just because you are asking me.
This I understand I'm a replacing man Go do your reading The thread, stop feeding Until everything do you understand.
|
Five minutes to flip Did you all dip? Super please give your last thought Before you go back to rot From you I'd like one more quip.
|
You all are stupid Cora was scum Just count the deaths thatwiththe night come All townies claim shots The topic is hot We'll know if we killed the right one.
|
Magic marker made a colour change Either way it was strange Red to green or green to red What's said has been said Either way we still have scum to hang
|
Sloosh and fool are still red I want them both dead They have played a scum game We can have it arranged That both turn up with no heads.
|
On March 16 2013 00:48 marvellosity wrote: slOosh, Vivax.
What a out fool where is he? What happened to your top three? Where did he go? And townie in hiro? Your thoughts I want to see.
|
On March 16 2013 00:48 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +So cora and Foolishness are making an elaborate ploy where they deflect a scum lynch onto another scum when they had the power to lynch whomever they chose (given that cora had 2 votes and people weren't aware of Foolishness' deflection). And absolute certainty means they planned this out, so they can do a fake message that implicates marv as scum. This part is irrefutable. Foolish telling us how his role works was pro-town. Cora voting himself when he could have gotten others lynched wasn't scum agenda.
Whether is was town or scum It was pretty dumb This was a ploy Whether by green or red boy Up his ass was his thumb.
|
Yamato, you've missed nothing of worth of logical posting there has not been a birth there is yelling and screaming it is not redeeming though some things cause some mirth.
I hope we'll vig foolish he can be slapped with a fish at him I'll still point his kill will be joint I guess that karma's a bitch
This magic marker was used and we were confused but I thought cora was red and that is stuck in my head all I know is some role was abused
Now I'll send in my action wait for scum's reaction when fool becomes useless no longer a threat he is getting smacked down, son.
|
On March 16 2013 04:37 austinmcc wrote:marv, take a look at iamp's filter for a second. Blind yourself to the bits where he supports you. Blind yourself to the parts where his reads line up with yours A LOT of the time. Is town iamp....this unfocused? Some may be roleplaying, but actually read his filter critically. Especially during D2 when the thread didn't need any help being a mess. He's got a couple reads, and he talks about those when they come up, sometimes, but he just never ever goes out of his way to START anything. He never goes out of his way to comment on anything that isn't being commented on, and he's got NOTHING as far as...half or so of the thread is concerned. It's all so short and terse that I can't get much from it, besides some associative stuff once we have more flips. But...is this iamp? Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 10:37 iamperfection wrote:On March 14 2013 10:33 Vivax wrote: Iamp what do you think of lynching crossfire or yamato instead? i feel strongest about ver as well as fool stilli dont think cross is mafia that lynch deadline stuff still makes me think he is town Yamato not playing is extremely concerning but i feel stronger about ver and fool Thinks you're town. You parity checked those two as different. You telegraphed that, so decent chance there was a frame, but he wants to lynch both. No comment ever on whether he thinks there's a cover ability or something, he just doesn't update his read AT ALL from both scum during N1 --> opposite parity check from someone that seems to be a major town read.
you wanted to ask me something? What was it little thing? I have not much time so reply to my rhyme before to work myself I must bring.
|
On March 16 2013 04:46 austinmcc wrote: In case that quotes bit was unclear, here's what I'm getting at.
iamp N1 has both Foolishness and Ver in his scum list marv D2 comes back with a parity check on those two as different iamp strongly believes marv to be town
iamp continues to push both Foolishness AND Ver. He does not explain why he does not trust the check.
That's fine, in and of itself. There were a lot of comments in the thread about how the check was telegraphed, and so there could be a frame or a rb. But we know marv wasn't roleblocked (PARANOIA PARANOIA: IF HE'S TOWN (WHICH HE PROBABLY IS)). And if the checks came back different, that means a frame doesn't explain both being scum.
If both were TOWN, you could frame one, have the parity check come back different, and lynch them BOTH. Get rid of 1 of 2 big scary players that you would not want to face as scum.
But if both were SCUM, you can't frame them to make the parity check come back different. You'd need a cover ability, or a framer that specifically can do both, which MIGHT be the case. Or a gf, which MIGHT be the case.
iamp just jumps into wanting to lynch BOTH players though. Despite the parity check, despite a roleblock not occurring, despite a regular frame + the check indicating that both are actually TOWN. So he's relying on one of them being a gf or one of them being covered, but nobody is really discussing those powers and he doesn't see fit to mention. He just carries his night scum reads over to day, without taking into account a parity check that a big town read got back.
Scum. Dude scum.
most framers point both ways they make checks a haze red to green, green to red both can be said don't discount this thought today.
|
On March 16 2013 04:49 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 04:46 Promethelax wrote:On March 16 2013 04:37 austinmcc wrote:marv, take a look at iamp's filter for a second. Blind yourself to the bits where he supports you. Blind yourself to the parts where his reads line up with yours A LOT of the time. Is town iamp....this unfocused? Some may be roleplaying, but actually read his filter critically. Especially during D2 when the thread didn't need any help being a mess. He's got a couple reads, and he talks about those when they come up, sometimes, but he just never ever goes out of his way to START anything. He never goes out of his way to comment on anything that isn't being commented on, and he's got NOTHING as far as...half or so of the thread is concerned. It's all so short and terse that I can't get much from it, besides some associative stuff once we have more flips. But...is this iamp? On March 14 2013 10:37 iamperfection wrote:On March 14 2013 10:33 Vivax wrote: Iamp what do you think of lynching crossfire or yamato instead? i feel strongest about ver as well as fool stilli dont think cross is mafia that lynch deadline stuff still makes me think he is town Yamato not playing is extremely concerning but i feel stronger about ver and fool Thinks you're town. You parity checked those two as different. You telegraphed that, so decent chance there was a frame, but he wants to lynch both. No comment ever on whether he thinks there's a cover ability or something, he just doesn't update his read AT ALL from both scum during N1 --> opposite parity check from someone that seems to be a major town read. you wanted to ask me something? What was it little thing? I have not much time so reply to my rhyme before to work myself I must bring. Yeah, but earlier. I read you over a couple times and felt a little better, was worried about the drop in activity, and was hoping to get you more involved so I could reassure myself further. Like...supersoft, during yesterday, went from you being super super townie to moving you down his list. You were noticeably absent. Even if the rhymes are sometimes painful, you seem to be forced to condense your thoughts down and give short thoughts/directions. It works well, and we could use more of it. What do you think about this iamp bit?
I've been busy my man and I liked your plan of the thread getting less shitty so I posted less ditties my free time is out of my hands
Iamp is not impressive to me but the top of my list is not he his posts are dry air but I just don't care there are people involved much more scummy.
|
On March 16 2013 04:59 austinmcc wrote:And the check is important, and maybe overblown here, because this feels true. It's one of the few things that makes me go "hmmmm" in iamp's filter, the other stuff is often just so cursory.
so you on his posts you stumble say he is too humble no opinions of his own his thoughts are not known does this make you "number one scum" mumble?
that was the worst of my rhyming verse I'm sorry, my bad I had to reach, a tad I mean: is he scum first?
|
imp please don't respond to austin's check-based red thong who is your scum mr. evil number one the rest of austin's points are so blonde.
|
On March 16 2013 05:14 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 05:08 Promethelax wrote: imp please don't respond to austin's check-based red thong who is your scum mr. evil number one the rest of austin's points are so blonde. I think I have said fool for a gazillion times
You know that I want more so please, don't be a bore you know what I want your arrogance do not flaunt give me your scums and the reasons, the lore.
|
On March 16 2013 05:25 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 05:24 austinmcc wrote: No, never read WLIAA all the way through, apart from checking some filters when they were relevant to other games. Just take a browse through Crossfire's filter and look at the quality of his posts. Remember in PU he had a mason claim in his back pocket.
has he played that well in another shell? that game was his best so nows the real test can he, in another game, be swell?
|
On March 15 2013 12:08 cDgCorazon wrote: GG =)
so which townie would qouth "GG =)" when instead of town scum flipped he is this a green? that it does not seem with that conclusion his smilies disagree
|
On March 16 2013 06:19 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 06:17 yamato77 wrote:On March 16 2013 06:15 strongandbig wrote: what do people think of mocsta? I just tried reading his filter but most of it is tunneled in on corazon, and for some reason I can't convince myself that's genuine. from cursory looks over nomination and newbie 37, he looks a lot less aggro and more wordy in both of those games, so i guess he is telling the truth about going in for the roleplaying this game? Makes it hard to get a meta read though, right? that actually kind of points toward town for me, since i feel like scum would feel more pressure to try and match up to their own meta, but obviously thats a weak point Moc's posts about me SEEM genuine, but he might have just played off Cora intentionally when they were both mafia. Idk, I doubt that he's scum, but he is a possibility. His lack of interest in this game is concerning. I agree with this assessment. Probably town, to be looked at again if other more likely options go awry.
I think him a greenie a bit of a weanie bu nothing to worry about his ideas I'd tout especially mine: Rick getting the fourth beanie.
|
On March 15 2013 11:05 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2013 11:02 DarthPunk wrote: Yeah I actually have to agree with VIVAX on it being doubtful that corazon would try and kill himself as scum day 2. Not only is that against every instinct you have as scum. which is generally SURVIVE! SURVIVE! But I am sure his scummer friends would have something to say about him being suicidal.
The timing to say this is pretty scummy given you've almost not been pushing anything this day. The timing to say this is scummy if Cora flips town, that is.
|
On March 16 2013 07:38 slOosh wrote: Uhh I probably should have did a proper final edit instead of making many little edits, so a couple of sentences may seem leapish. An underlying thought through the case is (may or may not be explicit I edited a lot): I characterize stutters as a newer player, excited pregame but no excitement after game starts, whose thought processes' fit more aligned with a very mature mafia player, i.e. is unnatural.
his meta you do not know his thoughts from a townie do flow his play is crap but he gets a bad rap just because he is a little slow
|
On March 16 2013 07:53 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 16 2013 07:42 Promethelax wrote:On March 16 2013 07:38 slOosh wrote: Uhh I probably should have did a proper final edit instead of making many little edits, so a couple of sentences may seem leapish. An underlying thought through the case is (may or may not be explicit I edited a lot): I characterize stutters as a newer player, excited pregame but no excitement after game starts, whose thought processes' fit more aligned with a very mature mafia player, i.e. is unnatural. his meta you do not know his thoughts from a townie do flow his play is crap but he gets a bad rap just because he is a little slow ? If he is more of a newer player than it is more disturbing the things he says.
he isn't that new is my point to you I believe this game is number seven go read YAN, where on the dumb-o-meter he scored an eleven the scum I don't see in his stew.
|
|
|
|