|
On February 14 2013 10:11 Blazinghand wrote: Kurumi's posts have been obnoxious so I haven't bothered reading them. I'm like 90% sure he'll get vigged for being annoying IF ONLY I COULD
|
On February 14 2013 10:09 randombum wrote: Just got back. I'm currently dis-liking oats and gonzow. Marv too.
Oats. While I defended his original response to BH about his thoughts on mayor, he started to really clutter the thread asking pointless questions and getting really defensive/agitated. Sorta what some others have pointed out.
Gonzow. He called me scum. Seriously though, his play has been lacking focus. He has self admitted that he mainly cared for the role creation part. That might be true, or a mafia excuse to lurk. There's also his reasoning "too neutral" what does that even mean? Is he referring to the part that marv also mentioned where I praise BH after spending a really long post calling him wrong? That's just being polite.
Who would you kwamboozle right now if you could?
(note: kwamboozle is a sekrit codeword for doing what your role does)
Don't tell me why, just who.
|
I don't think it would give away a lot, but whatever floats your boat.
|
Yeah you better not waste the divine kwamboozle.
|
On February 14 2013 10:43 iamperfection wrote: Crossfire gets so many townie points for that. All my townie points.
|
On February 14 2013 10:45 Crossfire99 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 10:43 iamperfection wrote: Crossfire gets so many townie points for that. Is it weird that I was working on the filters before GreY even posted? I don't know even know why I decided to do it now, but I did. Yes, very.
|
You may find better results in actually asking questions.
Instead of throwing out a vote without real expaination except saying "i want questions answered"
|
On February 14 2013 10:50 Dandel Ion wrote: You may find better results in actually asking questions.
Instead of throwing out a vote without real expaination except saying "i want questions answered" EBWOP this was @kurumi in case that wasn't clear.
|
On February 14 2013 10:56 Kurumi wrote: Dandel, I asked him/her about amount of the games played. His/her fear seems irrational for me, like, that game had "experienced" tag over it I think? Well, IIRC he only played 4 newbies so far or something in that direction.
I have no idea what would make him so "overwhelmed" though. That's for him to explain.
|
It might possibly be possible that certain some people have posting restrictions or roles revolving around that, but HOW SHOULD I KNOW?
Also I like Cheesy's early posting. Too bad he vanished.
|
Sheeping BH is totally not scummy.
Also, randombum has my role so pls don't lynch, kk?
|
Yeah that is correct.
But my advice is to not lynch him until it's at least day 2 though.
Don't woray. I has plan.
|
Everybody's sheeping BH.
Okay, well actually just me. BUT It's the thing to do!
|
|
On February 14 2013 21:18 Oatsmaster wrote: The problem is that stutters is always really lurky :/ Not THIS lurky.
|
|
Altho I gotta say, Oats did not jump on the JUSTICE yet.
|
|
Oh that reminds me, I would lynch the Keirathi with pleasure.
He has been highly outraged about how much he wants to win, and yaddayaddadoo like that, but has not let his head be seen since.
Were I to wager a guess, that was quite some hours ago, indeed almost a day if my senses do not deceive me.
Truly, were his emotions genuine, he would be inclined to achieve this "winning" he so desires. This leaves him in a predicament, where either he was not genuine about his emotions, or, dare I say it, genuine about his emotions, but not in a way that is comparable to the sense of winning most people here have - indeed, I am talking about him wanting to win, clothed in the red shirts of the British.
|
On February 15 2013 00:48 marvellosity wrote: Perhaps it would behove gentlemen such as young Oats and Mr. D. Ion to use their own capacity for judgement. Perhaps they should respond with intelligent thought to the discourse given by others.
For example, I am still interested in why Mr. D. Ion imagined it a fine idea to vote for Stut-utt-ers when, as mentioned, he was in the previous establishment where I made Stut-utt-ers' usual behaviour quite apparent.
Mr. D. Ion, you seem willing to declare many of evil intent, and yet without rigorous discussion or rationality. Why is this so? You witnessed the previous establishment yourself. You should be able to spot the difference.
|
|
|
|