|
On February 13 2013 09:15 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Secret Ballot obviously best idea. I'm secretly scum and secretly don't want people to know who my secret buddies and I are secretly voting for. THIS GUY IS SEXY.
NOT YET SURE IF ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE.
|
On February 13 2013 09:18 marvellosity wrote: 1 kinda sounds hilarious. Are we against hilarious? I FIND IT KIND OF UNFAIR THAT THE VOTING FOR THE SECRET VOTING IS NOT SECRET TOO
WHAT'S THE POINT OF THAT
|
On February 13 2013 09:22 Crossfire99 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 09:18 jcarlsoniv wrote:On February 13 2013 09:17 Crossfire99 wrote: Wait why am I being voted for? RNG's a bitch Dude, I know. I am scum and you caught me. You should lynch me. LETS FIND OUT IF YOU ARE SCUM REAL QUICK
ARE YOU GOING TO LURK AND PRETEND ITS "RL ISSUES" AND ALL THAT OTHER STUFF?
A YES/NO ANSWER IS SUFFICIENT
|
On February 13 2013 09:29 kitaman27 wrote: If we all just agree on the instant majority option early, we can ensure people aren't able to comment freely on the mostly irreverent theme.
We can also use our knowledge of the roles that we picked for another player to our advantage. If we find someone using their role in a sub optimal anti-town way, we can just claim who we picked for and make them pay.
Also, look how scummy that Sylencia guy is! Lets vote for him. YOU CLEARLY HAVE NO IDEA HOW TO GET ATTRACTIVE MEN TO SHEEP YOU
THE SECRET IS CAPSLOCK
|
On February 13 2013 09:31 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: All aboard the Crossfire wagon choo choo!
*Waits for somebody to call this wagon retarded*
Yeah, maybe we should cut out the trolliness. Except Dandel, he is allowed to capslock entire game and be confirmed town in my book. I'M NOT TROLLING
|
On February 13 2013 09:32 Blazinghand wrote: I've already signaled my role-reciever that I'm his role-creator, if he's smart enough to pick up on it. If he's not, well, that's pretty typical of him. But it's okay. IF YOU GOT SOMETHING TO SAY; SAY IT
|
On February 13 2013 09:55 Kurumi wrote: I would like to welcome everyone to this great game. I hope we shall have fun together and be able to talk about this game in the future while sipping some good beer. As for obvious obviousnessess, it seems the poison is only for Day 1... Secret ballot is not something I'd root for. We should think if the Poison penalty will haunt this game or not. If it indeed does, my dear colleagues I think we could go for either of the remaining two. Both give us a list which we can analyse - isn't that great? On the topic of lists, I am going to make one just now: Tit for tat Friendship Love 100 1000 10000 I shall not kill, because that is not my job. I hope you, my dear friends will refrain from doing so. I love my tea. Not drinking it would be horrible. Someone up for some tea? I think we'd have great time together, every one of you is such a great company! Also, I dislike loud people. Dandel Ion, could you turn your volume down, pretty please? Merci.
Okay.
Sorry about that.
|
|
This just in, randombum is scum.
Because he didn't say hi.
|
On February 13 2013 12:04 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 12:01 Oatsmaster wrote: Well, I dont think mayor is necessarily good because its not worth the risk IMO. If we vote in scum, We will defiantly not get a scum lynch tomorrow, and also, it basically kills discussion. your reasons are bad you are scum ##unvote ##vote Oatsmaster This man seems to speak the truth.
##Unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster
|
I sheeped you before you walloftext'd.
##hipsterswag
|
On February 13 2013 14:05 randombum wrote: For a different topic, and since there's very little the mafia can abuse this. To my role-maker would having you be the first target make you happy? Hi.
No, I don't particularily want to be your first target. if you know what i mean. Which has to do with myself, not you. if you want to be awesome, get together with someone else.
|
|
|
That's shitty reasoning. Because you say with that, that town marv doesn't want/try to win. In which case a policy lynch is still a good thing to do.
|
On February 13 2013 22:08 marvellosity wrote:I see you aspire to continue your fine form from our previous encounter! Onwards! Sure, why not.
Maybe you'll even be able to keep it civil this time. A man can only hope.
|
They're breadcrumbing that they're in a scumteam together.
|
On February 13 2013 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote: I can smell Gonzaws smelly paws all over Marv's role/limitations in posting due to his role.
And how exactly do you know that it's a role limitation?
Smelly paws indeed.
|
On February 13 2013 23:48 iamperfection wrote: yo dandel my man
do you still think oats is scum? Yeah. Would lynch.
|
Would prefer to lynch marv though.
|
|
|
|