|
On December 13 2012 09:15 Foolishness wrote: And I made all of 3 posts before you guys hopped on the train and the case against me is better?
I am baffled you don't seem to be understanding what the issue is, at least from my perspective.
You still haven't provided anything other than "he's made no post longer than x" to support your claim marv is scum. I'm all ears, but you're not talking.
|
And I'm not interested in marv's later posts, I only want the analysis you did to initially conclude he's scum, so up until the point you made that decision.
|
Clarity you're a dumbass, you should have asked before you did that.
Foolishness and austinmcc are linked (by me). to each other, if one swaps worlds the other does too. I had to pick the targets very early and at the time I thought austin was my best guess for scum in the other world, the point being that if foolishness somehow left the world at least we'd get another scummy person into this world.
I haven't read anything more recent on austin, but apparently you have a townread on him. So my initial plan sounds less useful now, assuming you're not just being dumb.
|
You should have asked "I wanna switch austinmcc and keirathi, you guys ok with that?".
Anyway, I had to pick my target 5 pages into the other thread or so, so I rolled with austin who at the time had just made 2-3 very bland posts. I didn't and still don't have a particular scum read on him. I just didn't feel anything he had done was overly towny.
|
Well whatever happened happened. The good news is you cannot have known this would save foolishness, which makes it unlikely you're his scumbuddy, if he turns up scum, that is. Which I think is not unlikely.
|
On December 13 2012 23:36 austinmcc wrote: Well, hello there.
Palmar, can I ask not for names but whether there are other linked pairs, or at least the possibility for other/different linked pairs in the future?
Bitch please.
|
On December 14 2012 00:03 austinmcc wrote: I'm not used to seeing complete thoughts like this from Palmar to random questions. Palmar also heavily telegraphed how Foolishness's response would shape his read, whether honest or not, which feels a bit strange though. If Palmar's read is truly going to be influenced by Foolishness's response, then he wouldn't go telling Foolishness how to respond. I dunno, when I first read this post I liked it a lot, found it very townie, but the more I think about it the more it feels a bit out of character - fully formed response to a question, giving out a thought process that's invalid once you put it into thread.
I was explaining how I had expected him to answer, that's why I asked him to lay out his thoughts before I actually explained what I had hoped for hearing. To put it simply, by the time I explained what I wanted from him, I also closed the window on an explanation from him.
|
The king does as he wishes.
|
On December 14 2012 00:41 austinmcc wrote:I'm going to interpret this as "I've still been playing sven as a hard-support the last couple months."
I stopped playing sven, I don't enjoy it now that everyone expects me to carry.
I now play Rylai all day long. Here's a dota tip: if you get any +str or +hp item on rylai other than magic wand you're doing it wrong.
Anyway, now I don't know who to lynch in this world, tempted to kill someone useless/inactive.
|
@Sandroba in the other thread.
Do you think austinmcc could be scum?
|
wait oh, there was deadline tonight?
|
@yamato, no I don't read your thread.
WHAT NOW BITCH
|
I can't change the people I've got linked unless one of them dies.
|
|
|
|