|
On November 24 2012 15:38 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 15:21 Promethelax wrote: Hey all, just checked the day post and this page, since the mission was successful and I'm pretty sure one or the other of Sand/Syllo is scum Vote ## Sand, mission success=Town Syllo (According to Ockham's laser) I'm here and catching up (a million posts for me to read...). I'm all old and shit now. @PromIf sandro flips town, would you like to lynch syllo after that ?
Nope. At this point the success of the mission tips Syllo into a town read. I'm pretty confidant in Sand flipping scum. If I'm wrong I'll have to re think a lot of things. Back to my long post I gooooo!
|
On November 24 2012 01:23 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 01:08 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 24 2012 00:53 Oatsmaster wrote: Hopeless, how does predicting the party show his alignment? It doesn't, but it is definitely not scummy to me. He called out what I presume are two townies (event success) very early. That supposed ability is why he was a candidate in the first place, and he has lived up to that expectation in my eyes. Granted, he gave little in the way of reasoning, and it would be immensely easy to do so as mafia when you know which 'newbies' are town (or at least not mafia), but its still a point in his favor that his most recently proposed party (die/oats/kush) would likely have succeeded as well. (Man, Cyrus and Glenn in the same party? IMBA!)
On November 24 2012 00:56 Clarity_nl wrote:On November 24 2012 00:52 Clarity_nl wrote: Can everyone get over the fact that sand has been inactive and just gave a weird excuse and read his filter and my case, please? This goes especially for the people sheeping without giving reasons other than him going inactive. Wait, I'm doing that thing where I care more about the method than the result again, aren't I? A little bit, but I don't think you're wrong to insist we make a goddamn read for ourselves. Your case on sand shows that he's not trying to win the election. His activity could be to blame for that. -> He doesn't give strong or informed reads. Withholding reasons for a townread to me is not scummy until those same townreads become scumreads. If he continues to read a player as town, I'm fine with that. If they suddenly change to scum, only then do I feel I deserve to know his entire thought process. As a candidate for party leader, I can see why people would want his reads to be as transparent as possible, but I believe that winning the events is more important and I don't consider his 'not trying' to be scummy. Just pointing out that your reasoning is complete shite. If Sandro is scum, he doesn't magically lose the ability to see who is appearing townie in the thread. Add to that that he already KNOWS who is town and it becomes even easier for Sandro to pick a team with three townie noobs in it. We then get to setup speculation about whether that would make the event succeed, but on the face of it I still think 1 scum is enough to sabotage a 4-player mission. So Sandro picking a townie team is indicative only and alone of his ability to pick a townie team, which was never in doubt in the first place.
The above post is why I have such a strong town read on Acro, he said not only what I wanted to say in response to this point, he said it clearer and with more gumption than I would have.
On November 23 2012 06:55 Hapahauli wrote:@ PromethelaxShow nested quote +On November 23 2012 05:40 Promethelax wrote: Hapa, you will not get my vote today. You come to late to change this election and I don't like that you push us away from Sand/Syllo but don't mention Kita except as a 'joke' It is a joke. Give me a reason to take him seriously and I will do so. Also, you need to hash out your read on me because I have no idea WTF you're thinking. You mentioned I'm "easy to read," that you are comfortable reading me and whatnot, but your rationale thinking I'm "suspicious" or whatever is absurd. For example, you mentioned that I'm not the "confrontational town hapa" when in fact I'm also super-confrontational as scum. Then I see things like this, where you don't mention a damn thing about the important parts of my candidacy (namely my proposed partY) and go off on how you just don't like my attitude on Kita or some crap like that. You should have taken him seriously because he was making a push that didn't involve Sandroba. He was, for a while, the only opposition candidate and an unopposed mayoral election either means we have confirmed town or someone in his proposed party was scum.
My read on Hapa: not assertive enough to meet either of his metas, there were some early posts which rang false to me and I do not trust him. Too early for me to say scum but not to early for me to have you far from my green list.
Your party didn't matter to me, you did.
On November 23 2012 07:53 Hopeless1der wrote: ##Unvote: Syllogism ##Vote: Hopeless1der
Things and such. I know that this got mentioned before but I need to bring it up again. Hopeless: explain.
On November 23 2012 06:29 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2012 06:23 Promethelax wrote:On November 23 2012 06:21 Acrofales wrote:On November 23 2012 06:12 Promethelax wrote:On November 23 2012 06:06 marvellosity wrote: What apologetic bullshit? What are you talking about?
It's certainly possible sandroba could be mafia, but I doubt syllogism is. But why does one of them 'have to be'?
Also I take a somewhat perverse pleasure that people like you and Kei don't know how to read me accurately still. Although it'd be easier if you simply found me town, of course. the "oh maybe I'm reading you wrong because you are trying to post differently" you don't have confidence in your read there which is something I expect from you. one of them has to be mafia because if neither of them was the mafia play d1 was useless and without goal. I've said this before but assuming that mafia wanted to be in the party one of Syllo/Sand is 100% mafia. The only way this is not true is if mafia did not want to be in d1 party. Sorry bro, I read you as scum right now; we'll see if I'm still bad or if maybe I can read you now. Mafia have been ditched in elections before today. If both Sandro and Syllo are town, then mafia never stood a chance in this election in any case. Biding their time and waiting till after they can kill off some of the more influential town players seems like a decent move in that case. Or maybe they have some fiendish ability they can use to sabotage a mission regardless of whether there's a scum in it. It'd be super powerful, but god knows what's in this game. I believe a mafia player would have created a campaign. They could not have known that Sand and Syllo would own the fuck out of this election. Unless they did not want to be in the party which, as you state there could be reasons for. However it is easier for me, and makes more sense according to Occam, that scum wanted to be in the party. Anyways, its mah birthday and I'm going out to dinner with my folks and my young lady. I'll be back eventually. I hope the quest goes well, gl guys. Happy birthday and have fun! But how are you so sure no scum ran today (or if they did have to be in Sandro/Syllo pair)? Kita, GK, Hapa and Toad all took a stab at it. Any of them could be scum. Why you fixing on the syllo/sandro situation? Because they are the only two who gained momentum? Plenty of reasons why scum is afraid to start a wagon (meaning that if nobody else does, it fails). Particularly because if the party fails they suddenly have their whole scumteam on a scummy wagon. Same as any mislynch really. Scum tends not to be the first to vote.
Naw, I don't think starting a wagon of a scum (two man operation) would look too scummy. First voter is a pretty safe place to be. Decisiveness etc. As scum I love building false cases and getting my vote down early, makes me look townier and I think that scum could risk voting their buddy in this situation. I am indeed fixed on those that gained momentum. I tried to vote you but even you didn't vote you so yeh, momentum seems to matter. as to their 'whole scum team on a scummy wagon' I think 2-3 dudes could have started a pretty good wagon as long as one came in with good points which wasn't hard to do since they could bring three townies and still probably sabotage the mission .
On November 23 2012 06:38 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2012 06:15 Clarity_nl wrote: Prome, if marv is scum, and one of the syllo/sand is scum, does that mean syllo is scum? Because the way you're saying it, why would marv be backing syllo if sand is scum? Because the shitstorm is flying I want to point out this insightful comment by Clarity. I want this to be noticed by Prom when he gets back. I already replied to this. but it boils down to two points: 1) Marv was an early voted on Syllo, he could have been distancing himself and 2) Early game it seemed to me that Sand and Syllo would each include the other one in their party. 1 scum in, quest=fail.
On November 24 2012 04:20 Dienosore wrote: IDK if I'm town, but I win with town.
As for GK, he's popped up a couple times on my map, but the squigglies protruding and intruding his bubble are too varied for any reliable read right now. I havn't specifically examined him yet, so idk. My earlier leanings was scum, mostly because he attacked my credibility a few times for no real reason. Also, his demeanor was setting off some flags, but as many of you kindly have pointed out english isnt his first language.
ummm...haven't gotten past this post but GK speaks the English purty darn well, it is Djo who was mentioned as a non anglophone. y u no read thread? Or you may still be high from your blunt in which case, I'm right there with you.
Also: the "you win with town" thing means that you are town.
(thanks for them birthday wishes bro)
|
oh fuck me. Rest of that post is still coming. Sorry.
|
On November 24 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 03:28 TheChronicler wrote: Acro stop being bad. Go through my filter and you'll see me say my plan must be bad much earlier. You're pointing to a contradiction that doesn't exist. Sigh... What a useless diversion. Zbo scum? The "probably bad" was your first (and only, up until just now) mention of the plan being bad. It is here: Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 12:48 TheChronicler wrote:On November 21 2012 12:47 marvellosity wrote: TheChronicler, take a moment, sip a glass of wine, and ponder why every single person who has read your idea has thought it terrible.
It's either because you're a genius, transcended on a plane above any of us mere mortals, or your idea is bad. Alright, it's probably just bad. I just wanted to spread it out b/c I don't want to elect a scum person and have them controlling everything. From this I don't infer that you are actually convinced your plan is bad. You leave space open for it to go any way. I did feel convinced you were disabused of any thoughts about your plan when you responded to me, though: Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 03:37 TheChronicler wrote:On November 22 2012 03:23 Acrofales wrote:On November 22 2012 03:14 Dienosore wrote: I italicized 'first' because I wanted to draw attention to the fact that party leaders will be changing quite often and I feel as if people are thinking this is going to be a permanent position.
As for the majority elected team, I think it's more logical to do things this way, at least for the first cycle while we are completely in the dark. I don't view polling the masses as dodging responsibility, but rather taking away the mafias chance to have an iron grip on the initial proceedings (assuming scum is elected and starts a dictatorship). By putting the vote out into the open, we also have another opportunity to see where loyalties lie. I will correct you on this: 1. Polls are a terrible idea in mafia (I have tried to use them myself in my younger more nubby days and they are a terrible idea) 2. Expecting that mafia cannot manipulate a vote (especially an anonymous vote as in the poll system) is exceedingly naive. 3. You are dodging responsibility, because one of the reasons for voting for a leader is so he can be held accountable for his team. If the party fails, then everybody in that party comes under serious suspicion, but the leader most of all: he put a party together with at least one scumster (and probably more, or third parties, or something). Given that town reads are generally easier than scumreads, especially so early in the game, that means the leader either has really bad judgement, someone really fooled the crap out of him, or he is scum. By avoiding this dilemma and putting it up to majority vote, you cannot be held accountable in this manner, thus dodging this use of the party system, which, in the long run may very well be its most powerful use. I agree with your first two points, but I disagree with the third. Simply because he wants more people involved in the decision doesn't mean he doesn't want the responsibility. I'm assuming he's voicing the idea for whoever the leader ends up as. It's very similar to my idea. You didn't try to play it up as if the plan was good, or your idea should be brought back to the table. You simply gave your reasoning behind it. However, the problem is now. Your reasoning for voting for Syllo doesn't feel right at all. Lets look for any indication you think syllo is town: Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 03:42 TheChronicler wrote: I'm going to place my vote on syllo. Cave seems to be pushing syllo as someone who can't be elected because he's "taken himself out" when he's a very viable candidate. I'm driving to California, and won't be back in the thread for a good 12 hours. I will try to keep up with the thread on my phone, though. Just don't expect your questions to be answered until I get to my parents' place tonight. Not here. Show nested quote +On November 23 2012 03:50 TheChronicler wrote: I don't think we should be going for a swap with 4 hours left. I'm happy with my vote on syllo. Not here. Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:50 TheChronicler wrote: 3) Syllo chose a path almost completely opposite to mine. If mine was stupid, his must have been the correct choice. Why would you need to tell other people your choices if you're the one who's taking full responsibility. And least of all here. This reinforces my suspicion that you are scum and didn't need to "think" Syllo was town, because you knew Syllo was town. If someone at any point had asked me (and I believe they did) why I was voting for Syllo, my answer is: I believed Syllo to be town and trust his judgement to pick townie party members. You skip over the "I think Syllo is town" part in every one of your explanations for your vote and justify it with contrived excuses that give post-hoc rationalizations for a sheep vote. Ergo: you're scum
This is a pretty convincing case and honestly, reading it and looking at TC's filter I'd say this is my answer Djo, I'd like to see TC swing if Sandro won't. I'd love the smurf to claim, I have a theory on who he is and why he won't reveal that which makes me hesitant to lynch him but if he refuses to claim I will assume I'm wrong and just play as if he is any other player.
On November 24 2012 05:48 Keirathi wrote:Mmm, busy day today. Some comments: TheChroniclerThe points against him are really strong (particularly the "giving town reads is anti-town" opinion, when his day 1 plan relied exactly on that). Waiting on him to explain more, but I'm liking him for the vote today right now. sandrobaNothing in his filter jumps out to me as anti-town mindset. Really, the only point against him is that he's been lurky, when I observed Looney and he was pretty lurky there too as town. Not enough for me to vote him right now. PromethelaxHe's someone else I think we should be talking about today as a lynch candidate. Let's take a look at his first two posts: Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 10:54 Promethelax wrote: *snip*
So, it seems to me that we need to vote for the towniest player possible for the challenge. I think anyone who wants to be elected as party leader should announce who they will pick to work with them so that they have something which they have to stand by. I don't want mafia to be able to choose an all mafia team (or 3rd party or whatever the hell else GreY put in this game). or, if they do I'd like them to have to at least put their stances in the thread on which players seem most townie and most scummy.
Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 11:01 Promethelax wrote: I see Acro has sniped me in terms of the idea of any potential leader posting their core group. Has anyone played in a similar set-up before? Or does anyone have the link to Resistance? I haven't read it.
Based on the fact that Acro had the same though as me and from our last game together I would currently, put him in my team, along with Acro I would add Marv (come on, wouldn't you?) and as third player I would chose Hapa. Hapa is a guy who over many games I have come to like and respect though I once hated him. He is a great town player and a kinda crappy scum player, seems like the right guy to have along for the ride.
TL:DR My team: Acro, Marv, Hapa
I'm curious if putting one player who seems like a liability (one of the guys known for trolling or one of the smurfs) onto the team so that we can get a read on them from their actions makes sense? It seems like we won't have lynches but knowing who scum is/is not will help town players direct any and all actions which they have and i assume making sure that non-town players not being on the quest team will be a good thing for us as the OP specifies that they can make it more difficult to achieve our objectives. So, he's already thinking about voting the towniest person into the group as a leader, because he didn't want an all scum party. He even goes so far as to suggest putting a "liability" into the group to test if they are townie or not. But, he doesn't pick people for his group because they are TOWN. He just picks them because he respects them as good players. They are two very different lines of thinking within just those two posts. Then: Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 12:08 Promethelax wrote: Kier: would you really vote for Marv? Do you think you have the ability to meta read him well enough to know that he is town? I don't think I could and, unless someone can convince me that he is town or the person he is running against is super scummy I will NOT vote Marv.
And: Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 12:16 Promethelax wrote: Keir: how many scum does it take to sabotage a mission? My guess is that even a single one will fuck us so a scum Marv would not need to pick any scummers.
But, marv was one of his proposed team, and, he was proposing to put a 'liability' player into the group to test if they were scum. However, those earlier thoughts don't line up with his thinking that a single scum could cause the event to fail. Now, I'll grant him a little benefit of the doubt here. His first two posts were still during the period of the game when people were guessing that the events were more of a "challenge" rather than a "plug townies in and you win" thing, so the change of opinions could make some sense. But he was still worried about having a part without scum in it earlier, but his picks didn't show that at all. And now, what really got me thinking about Prom more: Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 02:22 Promethelax wrote: You know catching up with this thread is a million times worse than I was hoping, remember how I said that I was toning down the amount which I am posting? Could you all do me a favour and consolidate too. Thanks.
After reading the last ~20 pages I have come to a conclusion as to who I want to vote. It isn't Sylo and it isn't Sand. Their abilities are, no doubt, incredible but I don't like the way Sand took over the thread early and no one challenged him. I feel that a mafia player would in fact have tried to take over. (Remember Matt's reed of Decundo in PP) as such I'll be voting away from the two of them and towards someone who I read as town right now and who is known for having good reads.
## Vote: Acro
Come on boys, lets do this right and make Sand have to fight for his nomination.
I'll be out again for a few hours. See ya'll soon. Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 15:13 Promethelax wrote:On November 22 2012 09:53 sandroba wrote:On November 22 2012 02:22 Promethelax wrote: You know catching up with this thread is a million times worse than I was hoping, remember how I said that I was toning down the amount which I am posting? Could you all do me a favour and consolidate too. Thanks.
After reading the last ~20 pages I have come to a conclusion as to who I want to vote. It isn't Sylo and it isn't Sand. Their abilities are, no doubt, incredible but I don't like the way Sand took over the thread early and no one challenged him. I feel that a mafia player would in fact have tried to take over. (Remember Matt's reed of Decundo in PP) as such I'll be voting away from the two of them and towards someone who I read as town right now and who is known for having good reads.
## Vote: Acro
Come on boys, lets do this right and make Sand have to fight for his nomination.
I'll be out again for a few hours. See ya'll soon. That's a clear misrepresentation of what happened. Many people were putting their names out there to be party leader and I came about with a different aproach and it got support based on the ideas in it. Mafia hardly ever goes against the consensus and stick their neck out there to oppose in that way. That's a shitty, if not mafia oriented, reason for opposing me. You even include syllo in it randomly and don't comment on why he isn't the choice. I'm catching up, but writing as I read. I have never played with either of you before, I have trouble reading you and while it is true that you gained much support on a good idea. One which you got from reading the OP more acuretly than anyone else (we all thought that we needed strong players on the team, you realized that all we needed was townie players) you are a smart guy and, from what I have read of you, I would bet that you would have made this same play as town or scum. The fact that there was not an obvious counter wagon after you makes me lean scummy on you just as an unopposed lynch on day 1 would give me a townie read on the player who was up for lynch. I did not address Syllo because he did not seem to be a credible candidate to me at that point. I'm not going to vote Acro as he did not try to generate momentum from my vote on him and I will be voting somewhere else instead. On November 21 2012 13:16 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 21 2012 12:57 Promethelax wrote:On November 21 2012 12:53 Clarity_nl wrote: Sharing is caring? Sharing is great when votes are made, It is early in the day and allowing everyone to continue to play without knowledge of each others town reads is probably for the best. No need for scum to get a chance to plant seeds of doubt on our town reads or to keep working on rowing themselves as townies if we have green reads on them right now. You'll know my town read when I am confidant enough in it to place a vote. I'd like to learn Acro's at the same time. Well that's an easy way to make sure your town reads don't look so suspicious, isn't it? nah brah, it is how I play. I don't vote for a scum read until I think they are scum even if the thread as a whole disagrees (look at my d1 town vibes on muso in ACME). I was about to support Kush as a townie. He talked to me pre game about his fear of the size of this game and the themey-ness of this game. He was truly concerned and did want a just Vanilla game. I would expect more posts from scum kush because he would want to match his meta. My vote will be on Kita, the candidate I trust. The reasons I trust him 1) I am in his party and know that I am town. That leaves only three others in the party and I have a town read on all three. 2) I am very unhappy with how into Syllo/Sand this thread is. The lack of a real campaign away from theirs worries the shit out of me. Mafia would want to be leader or in the party and the only way that is confirmed is if one of them is mafia. Ergo ## vote: kitamanI'm keeping up with the thread but doing my best to spam less as I have less to say. Trying to keep my posting short and sweet, this thread is hard enough to read without my help. I'll be around for a bit. Any questions: shoot. In the first post, he addresses Syllo as a serious candidate, then in the second he says "I didn't address syllo because he wasn't a serious candidate at that point". 1) I do think he was a serious candidate and 2) Prom did actually address syllo. Which makes me wonder why the hell he even said that. His whole argument about there not being a counterwagon to syllo/sand only makes sense if BOTH of them are scum. If one of them is scum, then the other IS the counterwagon. But what really bugs me is how he jumps off of the Acro vote because "Acro didn't try to gain any momentum with my vote" and onto kita, SOMEONE HE HAD NEVER EVEN MENTIONED. First off, that argument for jumping off of Acro doesn't make any sense. Does not trying to gain momentum make Acro scum? Certainly not. Scum would 100% want to garner support to get elected as party member if he already had some modicum of support behind him. Of course, he still has a town read on Acro because Acro is in kita's proposed party. But, it really feels like he's just looking for justification to hop off of Acro and onto the candidate who has him as a party member (and I actually find kita's justification for putting him in the party pretty weak anyways. I'm not positive if that makes me think kita is scum yet, though). Now, like I said earlier, I can see a townie doing that if at least one of the following two condition are met: 1) he, knowing he is town, believes that all 4 people of the proposed party are, in fact, town (which was what he said) 2) has a scum read on all the other available candidates. But there are a TON of benefits for a scum to do this. Especially a scum who ostensibly believes that 1 scum could cause a mission to fail. Bah, I'm kind of rambling a bit. TL;DR - Ran smear campaign on every other potential candidate in an effort to get the one candidate that had him in the party elected.
Kier: you have some good points but you surround them with a lot of fluff. I have not been playing up to my usual standards and probably should be pushed here but adding the early d1 crap where my knowledge of the set up was changing by the minute is silly.
Acro not voting himself was a reason to unvote him because clearly he didn't feel confidant to be leader. He is still on of my srongest town reads but town read =/= leader read. As to my reasoning to vote Kita instead of Syllo (the only guys with votes on them at that time) Kita's party included me (I looked at my role pm, I know I'm town) and Acro, my town read. As well as Deino a guy I think all of us have a town read on.
also Kita posted this early: On November 21 2012 11:15 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2012 11:12 marvellosity wrote: Probably some mix of town reads and probable utility (if someone is clever, derp) is the right way of choosing teams.
Like if someone is clearly town but an idiot then I wouldn't invite them into my hypothetical party. I disagree, I think someone being clearly town should take priority over everything else, even if they aren't the most reliable of players. which is as townie as it gets, now he (Kita) was the least townie of the bunch but he was still a light green while the three party members were dark green. That was way better than any of the other options in my eyes.
You even say at the end of your case that I could be town or scum...that isn't the scumhunter I used to know. Where did your common sense go? You state two things which would have to be true for a town me to do what I did and hey look both of those things are true and present in my filter. (not the town read on Kita but eh, I only developed it when I looked at him again after his platform was proposed). I still thought and think that based on how d1 played out up til that point that either Syllo or sand was scum, now of course I think it is Sand and think that Syllo is town though.
On November 24 2012 06:08 marvellosity wrote:I am still pretty concerned at Prome's alignment and your post makes sense. Right now I'm trying to get a read on kita out of syllo though ;p
I'm hurt that you think that makes sense. Being conerned about my alignment=fair, liking that case=fucking stupid
On November 24 2012 10:39 Dienosore wrote: Also, who is this VE guy, and why do you all immediately start calling him by a nickname? Should I be concerned? Be afraid, be very afraid.
VE: you still owe us some pictures from LC, I won't love you until I see them.
Hapa made a case on me but it is long and I'll just link to ithere I guess I didn't explain well in the early game why I thought that one of Sand/Syllo had to be scum butI think I have since that point. If you want to hear it again here goes + Show Spoiler +there were two gyus who both seemed content to put each other in their parties, there was no strong opposition to these two guys except each other. If both of these players were town mafia would have tried to push a candidate as I believe 100% that mafia wanted to be in the party. ergo one of Sand/Syllo was scum. I was more comfortable with Syllo because he did not explicitly state that he would take Sand, and his play in general gave me more of a townie vibe. If I'd had my way Acro would have been elected but sine things worked out I have to admit that I was wrong to oppose Syllo
Consolidation that I asked for was shut down, consolidation was on the Obama/Romney ticket and no one else. The one party system wasn't working for me.
Z-bo: you are worried that I am playful towards Marv even though I have a scum read on him. Sorry. I like Marv, he is a good guy. I like to tease him and am more comfortable with him as a person than I am many of the other players in this game. I also am aware that my reads are not always right and interacting with players helps me in that respect.
|
Sandroba: please claim why you targeted Syllo with your ability last nigth
|
On November 24 2012 17:29 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 17:22 Promethelax wrote: Sandroba: please claim why you targeted Syllo with your ability last nigth @PromSandro claimed to be roleblocked by the way... Show nested quote +On November 23 2012 21:51 sandroba wrote: Oh my it seems I'm the only person in the game that doesn't get to have a real life every so often. I spent the night at a girl's house ytd and only got home now. I thought I would give the thread a quick read before heading to bed (yes my sleep schedule is severely fucked up) and I see that suddenly I became the main wagon. Nice. Weekend is ahead and it will be extremelly busy and now I have to fight syllo induced mislynch just to prob face the same problem again the next day. Thx. I'll be here briefily if anyone want to interact, but I'm heading to bed. I took 125 dmg and got roleblocked.
I know who he was pointing at when he got blocked, okay?
|
On November 24 2012 17:38 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 17:31 Promethelax wrote:On November 24 2012 17:29 Djodref wrote:On November 24 2012 17:22 Promethelax wrote: Sandroba: please claim why you targeted Syllo with your ability last nigth @PromSandro claimed to be roleblocked by the way... On November 23 2012 21:51 sandroba wrote: Oh my it seems I'm the only person in the game that doesn't get to have a real life every so often. I spent the night at a girl's house ytd and only got home now. I thought I would give the thread a quick read before heading to bed (yes my sleep schedule is severely fucked up) and I see that suddenly I became the main wagon. Nice. Weekend is ahead and it will be extremelly busy and now I have to fight syllo induced mislynch just to prob face the same problem again the next day. Thx. I'll be here briefily if anyone want to interact, but I'm heading to bed. I took 125 dmg and got roleblocked.
I know who he was pointing at when he got blocked, okay? Did you also know that he was blocked ? Like "sandro was blocked but his action was pointing at syllo" ? I would understand if you don't want to elaborate on this subject but I'm curious and I would like you to tell us more. It's up to you
I'll explain more if it becomes relevant. At the moment the knowledge which I will share with scum is the part that will actually help town. the rest of my role I'm keeping to myself for now.
|
On November 24 2012 17:46 syllogism wrote: That doesn't read like a town sandro post. It misconstrues parts of the case and the tone is off. It doesn't provide us anything useful. My vote isn't moving.
what quote are you talking about? Maybe I'm retarded but I don't see it.
|
On November 24 2012 17:54 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 17:48 Promethelax wrote:On November 24 2012 17:46 syllogism wrote: That doesn't read like a town sandro post. It misconstrues parts of the case and the tone is off. It doesn't provide us anything useful. My vote isn't moving. what quote are you talking about? Maybe I'm retarded but I don't see it. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=17006956
Would you do me the great kindness of going through that post piecemeal and explaining why each piece gives you a scum read. I agree with your read but want to know how you think.
|
Syllo, I'd like you to comment (AFTER Sand) on why you think his night action was directed at you.
I'm going to sleep now. 'night guys.
|
On November 25 2012 01:21 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 17:22 Promethelax wrote: Sandroba: please claim why you targeted Syllo with your ability last nigth This is a really important post. In any game I would host or any game that I can recall playing, a player who is roleblocked does not return any results to tracking abilities. As sandroba insists he targeted syllo, but was roleblocked, either one of these two players is lying or prom really needs to clarify his role.
On November 25 2012 03:54 marvellosity wrote: Although, kita, I will agree with you on this - Prome's absence is completely disgraceful given his earlier revelation and the fact that sandroba is the main wagon. That's pretty much completely unacceptable, whatever real life excuses he'll give us. okay, it seems that my role is pretty contentious for Kita and Kier (and probably everyone else who has a name that stars with K) the ability I used last night Roleblocks all players who target a single player with their actions. I took a gamble and assumed that I was the only one with a roleblocking ability because only two people claimed RB'd and I assumed that they both targeted Syllo. I did not want to reveal why I knew that those players targeted Syllo or the correlation with the roleblocks (this is why I haven't yet confronted marv about his targeting Syllo but now that the cat is out of the bag: Marv, what were you trying to do to the Great Leader?). I decided to gamble that i was right and that Sand had targeted Syllo (50% chance at least just from there being only two RB claims) and force him to claim what he had done. My bread crumb should be obvious to anyone looking but here it is:
On November 23 2012 05:40 Promethelax wrote: Hapa, you will not get my vote today. You come to late to change this election and I don't like that you push us away from Sand/Syllo but don't mention Kita except as a 'joke' I agree with you that we should not be voting Sand based on his unopposed candidacy and I didn't want to vote Syllo since he seemed intent on bringing Sand with him on the mission. I still prefer Syllo over Sand and will vote him if things get tight, as it is though I am more comfortable with Kita than either of them, his town reads are still strong to me even though he is not as townine in my mind as any of the three he chose to take with him.
In my catching up I saw Kita post something asking why I was voting him if I didn't think he was the best leader. I thought I had made this clear, he was the best leader with a chance of success. If that wasn't clear my apologies, my intention was to communicate that Kita was the least of the evils which were available to me.
I am sending in my night action(s) now. I will be in the thread for another hour.
Syllo: I believe that it is now time for you to announce the members of your team and the reasons for their inclusion. You probably will win this election and I would like to hear your reasons for their inclusion in your team, you may not be able to give us those reads next day since you may be killed by scum/3party. I don't want to block up the thread with a lot of fluf but I think that your reasons would be a worthwhile inclusion that might protect townies from other townies at a later date. this is why I said that I was sending in my night actions there, to be clear that this is where I specified them. I'm saying that I am using my power to protect Syllo and that it will [role]block people who target him. It isn't a brilliant crumb but I think the awkward wording speaks for itself, this is a crumb. I have other powers but this is the one you need to know about. If I place this on a plyer and they are not targeted for a certain number of cycles than it will provide a certain amount of protection against damage from any in game source.
That being said I would like to return to game things:
On November 25 2012 02:11 Clarity_nl wrote: Can someone other than marv confirm that Drazerk would be a coinflip at the point? I have not played with him but the games I have read of his would suggest that this is totally true. Marv is right here.
Hapa: you ignored everything I said in response. I think you know better that my actions follow the way I think about the game which, as should be obvious, is not always the dominant way of thinking. Since you haven't responded to me I don't have more to add except that you are a top scum read for me now. I've never seen you, as town, push that someone is scum but also refuse to engage with them. You are more hands on. I expect this disengaged sort of attack from Zbo but not from you.
hah, gotcha Sand. In post game I'm going to revel in getting that one right. Just in case anyone wasn't sure.
|
hey Marv, baby, why did you target Syllo n1?
+ Show Spoiler +sorry about my play sensei, I will do better
|
On November 25 2012 09:36 CaveJohnson wrote: Oh nmd thanks prom lol
for saying you'd be a coinflip? It is true, but if I had bullets you'd be eating lead.
|
On November 25 2012 09:37 marvellosity wrote: incidentally this is why I was fairly believing of kita earlier, because he claimed his shot on Drazerk only did half damage.
Obviously these actions were nothing to do with me, but the 50% resonated with my role.
interesting. So I am the only RBing role in the game. Or the only one activated n1. I assume some people have multiple abilities and not all would necessarily use the rb, where is the glory in that?
Marv, if you are a 600 character why didn't you try harder to get in the team d1? Didn't you feel that since your ability got a bonus your hidden modifier would too?
On November 25 2012 09:40 kitaman27 wrote:^_^ I took 50 damage last night. I picked sandroba from my guessing game and avoided the damage. I'm also part of a fun new game, which I won't reveal yet -_- Considering Sandroba never returned, I think we should be looking for players that show signs of frustration towards his absence. Show nested quote +On November 25 2012 09:36 marvellosity wrote:On November 25 2012 09:34 Promethelax wrote:hey Marv, baby, why did you target Syllo n1? + Show Spoiler +sorry about my play sensei, I will do better I'm basically a medic type role. I reduce incoming HP by half on the target player (or in 600 AD, 2 players). So Cave trolls it up to attract kp, syllo is bussed with cave, and syllo takes my hit, while cave gets protected.
the roleblocks buddy, the roleblocks. Neither of those things went through.
Draz: why are you thanking me for my ability? What did it do benefit you?
|
On November 25 2012 09:46 CaveJohnson wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2012 09:42 Promethelax wrote:On November 25 2012 09:37 marvellosity wrote: incidentally this is why I was fairly believing of kita earlier, because he claimed his shot on Drazerk only did half damage.
Obviously these actions were nothing to do with me, but the 50% resonated with my role. interesting. So I am the only RBing role in the game. Or the only one activated n1. I assume some people have multiple abilities and not all would necessarily use the rb, where is the glory in that? Marv, if you are a 600 character why didn't you try harder to get in the team d1? Didn't you feel that since your ability got a bonus your hidden modifier would too? On November 25 2012 09:40 kitaman27 wrote:^_^ I took 50 damage last night. I picked sandroba from my guessing game and avoided the damage. I'm also part of a fun new game, which I won't reveal yet -_- Considering Sandroba never returned, I think we should be looking for players that show signs of frustration towards his absence. On November 25 2012 09:36 marvellosity wrote:On November 25 2012 09:34 Promethelax wrote:hey Marv, baby, why did you target Syllo n1? + Show Spoiler +sorry about my play sensei, I will do better I'm basically a medic type role. I reduce incoming HP by half on the target player (or in 600 AD, 2 players). So Cave trolls it up to attract kp, syllo is bussed with cave, and syllo takes my hit, while cave gets protected. the roleblocks buddy, the roleblocks. Neither of those things went through. Draz: why are you thanking me for my ability? What did it do benefit you? If anyone was only targeting me surely they would of been roleblocked? or am I misunderstanding the role
if anyone targets the player I used it on they are roleblocked. I didn't use it on you though. why do you think that I did?
|
On November 24 2012 17:18 Promethelax wrote:-snip- Hapa made a case on me but it is long and I'll just link to it here I guess I didn't explain well in the early game why I thought that one of Sand/Syllo had to be scum butI think I have since that point. If you want to hear it again here goes + Show Spoiler +there were two gyus who both seemed content to put each other in their parties, there was no strong opposition to these two guys except each other. If both of these players were town mafia would have tried to push a candidate as I believe 100% that mafia wanted to be in the party. ergo one of Sand/Syllo was scum. I was more comfortable with Syllo because he did not explicitly state that he would take Sand, and his play in general gave me more of a townie vibe. If I'd had my way Acro would have been elected but sine things worked out I have to admit that I was wrong to oppose Syllo Consolidation that I asked for was shut down, consolidation was on the Obama/Romney ticket and no one else. The one party system wasn't working for me. -snip-
in case it wasn't clear (I was pretty high so maybe it wasn't) I didn't feel that Sand and Syllo presented differing platforms both had the other on the ticket, I thought, hence why I referred to them as Obama/Romney. The idea being that voting for one was the same as voting for the other.
|
On November 25 2012 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2012 14:05 syllogism wrote: I took 50 damage.
I'm going back to bed, but very briefly him suggesting that his modifier is likely low was something that probably makes people less likely pick him. He also pointed out the fact that if parties are announced in public, mafia has easier time choosing who to support and that was a pretty towny observation and something that occurred to me as well. In addition he wasn't afraid of asking me and sandro whether we thought he was suspicious. @PromSyllo took damage, but you managed to catch sand with a roleblock. He freely admits it, but later it seems you weren't sure. Were you bluffing him out when you said you knew he targeted syllo? Either way, if you're telling the truth it means that syllo was hit by a multi-target ability or he was hit by recoil from his own abilities, because you would have protected him form anything else. If someone is able to account for the 50 damage on Syllo in such a way that it proves Prom is lying about his roleblock ability, Prom is not town. I don't think that is the case, I just want to make that apparent to anyone that knows more than I do. Unless someone chimes in, I currently have a town read on Prom for trying to protect the successful party leader.
Yeah I was bluffing but I thought it was a safe bet. There were only two roleblocks and it seemed inconceivable that no one targeted the leader of the town party besides me. So I took a gamble, i knew my credibility was pretty low but I knew my role could make or break this lynch (theoretically) so I challenged Sand on it.
I was pretty shocked about the damage which Syllo claimed (I thought I would block it all and that mafia would have individual abilities and NOT factional kp but this is false, mafia has kp!) and I assumed that it was Mafia KP (another reason which I didn't state earlier that i thought he was Town in the 'one of Sand/Syllo is scum' argument). I looked at my pm again in writing this to confirm my abilities, it only roleblocks players so I imagine that factional kp is not blocked.
|
On November 25 2012 10:46 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2012 10:39 Promethelax wrote:On November 24 2012 17:18 Promethelax wrote:-snip- Hapa made a case on me but it is long and I'll just link to it here I guess I didn't explain well in the early game why I thought that one of Sand/Syllo had to be scum butI think I have since that point. If you want to hear it again here goes + Show Spoiler +there were two gyus who both seemed content to put each other in their parties, there was no strong opposition to these two guys except each other. If both of these players were town mafia would have tried to push a candidate as I believe 100% that mafia wanted to be in the party. ergo one of Sand/Syllo was scum. I was more comfortable with Syllo because he did not explicitly state that he would take Sand, and his play in general gave me more of a townie vibe. If I'd had my way Acro would have been elected but sine things worked out I have to admit that I was wrong to oppose Syllo Consolidation that I asked for was shut down, consolidation was on the Obama/Romney ticket and no one else. The one party system wasn't working for me. -snip- in case it wasn't clear (I was pretty high so maybe it wasn't) I didn't feel that Sand and Syllo presented differing platforms both had the other on the ticket, I thought, hence why I referred to them as Obama/Romney. The idea being that voting for one was the same as voting for the other. That's not a "response" - that's you replying to a very select portion of my suspicions and burying it in a long post (in a spoiler, rofl) where noone can see it. There are several things I want to hear about: 1) Why were you so at peace with the idea of voting Syllo, when you were convinced that one of Sandrob/Syllo was scum AND you thought Syllo would include Sandrob in his party? 2) Why were you trying to push "consolidation" early in the thread, then attacked Sandrob/Syllo for the sake of opposition? 3) Why didn't you treat Syllo as a "credible candidate"? (Also, funny that you accused me of not taking kita seriously in one of your previous posts as scummy).
1) I found sand the scummier of the two. He was also the only one who exclusively said he'd take the other, meaning Syllo was the lesser of two evils. 2) I thought a smaller pool to pick from would force scum to place a vote which would matter, instead of a throw away vote like the one Thrawn posted d1 in Mario for example. A three or four candidate system would have meant that everyone needed to express opinions. Sand and Syllo (when they were including each other) were one place to consolidate onto instead of four. I didn't want the leader chosen early d1 I wanted us to narrow our scopes after ~1/2 of the day had gone by so that no votes could be wasted on candidates without a chance. 3) because he and Sand were pretty interchangeable in my head and Sand had more votes.
On November 25 2012 11:11 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2012 10:44 Promethelax wrote:On November 25 2012 10:38 Hopeless1der wrote:On November 23 2012 14:05 syllogism wrote: I took 50 damage.
I'm going back to bed, but very briefly him suggesting that his modifier is likely low was something that probably makes people less likely pick him. He also pointed out the fact that if parties are announced in public, mafia has easier time choosing who to support and that was a pretty towny observation and something that occurred to me as well. In addition he wasn't afraid of asking me and sandro whether we thought he was suspicious. @PromSyllo took damage, but you managed to catch sand with a roleblock. He freely admits it, but later it seems you weren't sure. Were you bluffing him out when you said you knew he targeted syllo? Either way, if you're telling the truth it means that syllo was hit by a multi-target ability or he was hit by recoil from his own abilities, because you would have protected him form anything else. If someone is able to account for the 50 damage on Syllo in such a way that it proves Prom is lying about his roleblock ability, Prom is not town. I don't think that is the case, I just want to make that apparent to anyone that knows more than I do. Unless someone chimes in, I currently have a town read on Prom for trying to protect the successful party leader. Yeah I was bluffing but I thought it was a safe bet. There were only two roleblocks and it seemed inconceivable that no one targeted the leader of the town party besides me. So I took a gamble, i knew my credibility was pretty low but I knew my role could make or break this lynch (theoretically) so I challenged Sand on it. I was pretty shocked about the damage which Syllo claimed (I thought I would block it all and that mafia would have individual abilities and NOT factional kp but this is false, mafia has kp!) and I assumed that it was Mafia KP (another reason which I didn't state earlier that i thought he was Town in the 'one of Sand/Syllo is scum' argument). I looked at my pm again in writing this to confirm my abilities, it only roleblocks players so I imagine that factional kp is not blocked. What is so hard to understand? Syllo got BUSSED. All the abilities that targeted him, targeted someone else instead and everything that targeted that someone else targeted Syllo. Scum shoots flying-under-the-radar-town. Sandro busses all damage from that townie onto Syllo and all the protection (just Marv) on Syllo onto the flying-under-the-radar-town.
totally possible. But I think that my ability resolved first. Since it blocked Sand and Marv both of whom targeted Syllo one of whom was bussing him (probably) actually now that I say that I'm not totally convinced he used the bus ability. Why should i belive that he used the ability name he claimed to have used?
Oats: I'd take another d1 player with you instead of clarity. No need to bring along someone in that spot whom we aren't sure of. Now I'd leave Marv behind too personally but if you bring him I'd like to be damn sure that everyone else with you is town because, though Marv is playing more Marv-like now, his day one play still rattles me.
I'm off to work, see you all. Good luck guys.
|
On November 25 2012 11:19 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2012 10:26 Oatsmaster wrote: I would take Acro, Marv, Clarity.
I dont think that scum Acro would soft defend Sandro because there is no upside for scum Marv is looking more and more townie at the moment. Clarity also started actually doing 'work' after I made my 'case' on him. I don't want to come. Swap me out for Dieno or Syllo... given the new information, I also prefer Chronicler over Clarity. I can see no reason for scum to bus Toad right now.
and you really didn't want to be party leader d1. Explain.
|
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck, just deleted a huge post because I am an idiot.
Summery:
Vote Dieno over oats, party leader can't be party leader two times in a row so save the guy with more health for later.
In response to Syllo: My role as I claimed it was true though I only mentioned one of my abilities. I did not use that ability in cycle two and therefore will not be claiming my action(s) from that cycle since knowing them will not help town but could aid scum in knowing what kind of threat I pose. I also think that the gift you got is quest related due to my ability. Same as I think the damage you took was mafia KP.
Zbo and Hapa: you both said you would respond to my points but didn't.
Toad: I doubt you are town but if you are think about the fact that I will be using my claimed ability this cycle to protect a strong townie so you need to direct your heal somewhere that I don't direct my ability.
Djo: your campaign is bad. Not a chance you'd get my vote.
|
|
|
|