|
On November 20 2012 11:13 Blazinghand wrote: what do debears hopeless and zb all hav ein common? townies, but not vts well ya i saw that posts to its kind of scummy because he doesn't really advocate which one he wants to get lynched but that post can also be interpreted as just assessing the reality of the situation.
|
oh i forgot to unvote
## Unvote
|
On November 20 2012 23:09 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 23:02 DarthPunk wrote:On November 20 2012 22:58 Clarity_nl wrote: Darth, this isn't snb's meta for town either. All his contributions are very timed with when he's in the spotlight. All that leaves is your gut.
Scummy about your current behavior is sudden emotional involvement in the game, where you showed none before, you have a scum read on me and djo. I'm town and I have a townread on djo. The fact that you think snb is town. This is all a smart way to go about things as scum. As snb will likely be lynched tomorrow if not today, so it behooves scum to keep him alive if possible.
Hopeless is confirmed, bh is confirmed, iamp is town, kickstart is town, djo is neutral, you are neutral You look scummier than djo, currently, because your reads have been the polar opposite of mine all game.
Like I said, I'm focusing on getting snb lynched today and I will do my research in the nightcycle. So that's all I got. Contradict yourself much. Since when have you had a town read on DJO? you just put him with me as scum after S&B. you have also mentioned him as possible scum several times previously. And Sorry buddy but you are scum because you are playing the game now and have different reads to me is not a good enough reason for someone to be scum. Also I am town. Which should be crystal clear to anyone with a brain. K, night night. Yeah, cause snb is scum. If for some reason he's not then it's you or djo, probably you. Conclusion, everyone else is town. I should have said town when I ordered everyone, yes, but he's my weakest town read so it's an easy mistake to make. you thinks dp recent agression means he could potentially be scum?
I think the opposite he had no reason to be aggressive at all.
|
On November 20 2012 23:21 Clarity_nl wrote: Would love to hear some thoughts iamp, did you finish reading up on me? yes i did
|
On November 20 2012 23:57 Clarity_nl wrote: Your play just seems super similar to your two last games as town.
I don't see a scum djo jumping on blazing in that situation I don't see a scum djo being so into the setup speculation. Generally I'd call stuff like that scummy but you really seemed like you wanted to figure shit out, and you did. The going overboard thing is your meta. I don't see scum anyone suggesting a mass roleclaim plan like you did.
Those are my main points I guess. You're the same as the last two games, and you were town in those. I haven't had a moment of "yeah he's clearly town because of this", that's why my read is so slight. you know s&b suggested a mass role claim right
|
anywho clarity what do you think of s&b's point here for day 1
- he's been asking a lot of questions, but often without sharing his own positions or thoughts until being pushed
i know you said you ask those questions to elicit a response but i looked through your filter and you took almost 0 hard positions at all. Worrisome for obvious reasons but if you look at the shitstroms that happened on day 1 your only hard stances came at the end of the day when you said lynching cross and hapa were stupid.
|
On November 19 2012 08:04 strongandbig wrote: okay listen up guys
I thought of this on the way back from work.
If we massclaim, it will instantly confirm half of the town.
The scum will have to either claim a blue role, or claim VT.
We look at the blue roles that get claimed, we back out the DCTVetc, and we calculate "for this set of blue roles, how many VTs should there be"
Then there will either be too many or too few VT claims. If there's too many, all the blues are confirmed. If there's too few, all the VTs are confirmed and one of the blues is scum.
sup now blazingasshole
|
im talking more about the major points of the thread though day 1
- The vt slip by S&B= You voted for it but didn't really take a hard position just asked for an explanation
- Bh wierd play in the beginning= Not much at all
-hapa's attack of me- Not much at all
-Hapa's attack on debars- You slightly considered voting him but not much of your own reasons why
|
like i think looking back at it if you look at what we know now the people that were fighting it out the most have been town.
BH, Marv, Debars and myself were all right in there getting our hands dirty you were just kind of there on day1 if you know what i mean.
|
On November 21 2012 00:59 Clarity_nl wrote:You mean this? Show nested quote +On November 14 2012 02:45 Hapahauli wrote:On November 14 2012 02:41 iamperfection wrote: I changed my mind deal with it bro. When I get home I might do it again. does that make me scum? If so continue if not don't waste my time Yes I think it makes you scum. It's not a coherent thought process. Look at how much you rationalize your town read on Z-Boson from that claim: On November 13 2012 09:45 iamperfection wrote: i guess theirs no reason not to believe zbos right? has to be to risky to do if he was scum right. On November 13 2012 09:50 iamperfection wrote: zbos explained it in his post would have been very risky in my view. On November 13 2012 09:55 iamperfection wrote:On November 13 2012 09:52 Hapahauli wrote:On November 13 2012 09:45 iamperfection wrote: i guess theirs no reason not to believe zbos right? has to be to risky to do if he was scum right. Woah woah hold-up. I'm not liking how you're trusting this claim right away. Claiming miller is a pretty much a riskless play here. We don't know how many millers are in the setup, and as far as I'm concerned, the claim is null until Z-Bo proves otherwise. its what i think so whatever. Zbos scum is gone put himself out there like that i dont think so. ...then you abandon all of this because of the "iamperfection rule" or some shit like that? I call BS. Yeah I recall seeing that and agreeing with marv, doing a complete 180 that early into day 1 is not scum like. No one really talked about it afterwards so there was no point to comment on it. not really just that he spent a good amount of time trying to push a lynch on me. A grave mistake in my eyes . right hapa?
|
also the getting the name's wrong on purpose is my thing
|
On November 21 2012 01:05 Blazinghand wrote: ##unvote ( ͡° ͜ʖ͡°)
|
On November 21 2012 07:25 Blazinghand wrote: eating dinner atm. will make meta read on iamp then vote someone dont fuck it up
|
On November 21 2012 07:46 Blazinghand wrote: Please iamp when have I fucked up anything this game i always thought you weren't that funny. I stand corrected
|
I'm gonna guess djos vote isn't going to change since he is asleep?
|
Clarity go through your filter day 1 and tell me how many clear positions you took.
A little exercise for you.
|
On November 21 2012 07:56 Clarity_nl wrote: I don't have to go through my filter, I already did after snb's case. Please keep in mind that it was day 1.
Before my case on darth I took no strong stances. Then I took a strong stance on darth until I switched to zbo because I realized darth was not going to get lynched, and his replies started to look townie.
I do not believe this is scummy. Day 1 is about collecting information and creating a town atmosphere, and there's more than 1 way to go about doing that.
I ask you to look beyond day 1 as well. the game changed dramatically after day 1 i think in this game the interactions on day 1 are most important. After day 1 and night one the remaining scum had no ones interest but his own correct?
|
why do i get so much sense of fear from your recent posting clarity?
|
i must mull this over dinner
|
On November 21 2012 08:41 Blazinghand wrote: really if I can just nail down a solid 3rd townread like kick and iamp we win since we have 3 lynches to spend From phone
Djo is town I would say. Look at conversation after i voted
|
|
|
|