Mario Mini Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 16:49 DarthPunk wrote: Is the reason for that his play is too 'risky' or too 'scummy' to be scum play? Because that is what I got from waht thrawn says and you just agreed with it. If that is the case then I'm not buying what you are selling. there's no such thing as too scummy for scum play | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 16:57 DarthPunk wrote: Ok then can you explain to me why only idiots and scum are voting for S&B. Cause I can't see it. cause he's town. it's not my job to defend the man, just to point out the scum on his wagon. read his filter and tell me that's scum S&B seriously dude | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
yeah I went there I've been sitting on that joke for so long | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 17:04 Clarity_nl wrote: Why is it like pulling teeth to get answers out of you? Lol say something about ZB plz | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 17:06 DarthPunk wrote: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. BTW What is a Begger man Mr. Caos? That was breadcrumbing a night check. I believe I was a watcher that game, and it was a reference to a spy novel by john le carre. I got back no results so I crumbed it as Beggar man, who WAS NOT the mole in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 17:06 DarthPunk wrote: So it's meta? Well I have only played scum with him so I wouldn't know. I have no further comments on S&B as long as your only comments on my case on ZB are peripheral to whether or not you agree with it. And really, the S&B wagon is irrelevant and won't roll across the line because we're lynching ZB today. S&B isn't scum. | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 17:09 DarthPunk wrote: Finally. That has bugged me since forever. It was the weirdest thing and I just couldn't figure it out. My mind is at ease. I typically don't explain breadcrumbs if they don't become relevant (as was the case in that game) in case I get an opportunity to re-use them. Making up crumbs is hard work! | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 13 2012 17:10 Clarity_nl wrote: I wish he posted more. It seems he was around for about 2 hours but he never really said anything of substance. The only original thought he had so far was his debears vote, which he quickly withdrew. The vote made no sense to begin with. "Debears didn't write a paragraph about a miller claim day 1, that's scummy!" ?? His miller claim makes sense, there's been no other miller claims. The only thing I don't like about it is that he explained his possible motivations as scum and town to claim miller, which isn't necessary. Your turn. zZz you think he's scummy or not? | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 02 2012 00:32 strongandbig wrote: Blazinghand, I am not saying you are violating the "mafia rules" or being "immoral" as the mafia community would see it. Churlish is a better adjective to describe your behavior than "cheating" would be. Dastardly, you're not being. Essentially, I think that "we joined this game to have fun with minigames in a mafia context, and just ignoring them isn't in the spirit of the game." For sure, you're well within your rights and the game rules to do what you've been doing, but I think the game would be more fun all around if we were all trying to follow the minigame rules and I hope the incentives to do so are stronger next time around. Going on to Adam. His posts this game "sound weirder" or "sound less genuine" to me than anyone else's except perhaps crossfire, who's playing the mad poet or something like that. It's hard to say whether that's because he's having a hard time posting naturally within the context of the minigame, or if it's because he is uncomfortable being scum or because he's not "being genuine" (I think that's how Sandroba described his scumhunting in some recent game I was following, reading people's posts and looking for people not being genuine etc). Just read through his filter a couple of times, it's not very long. K, here's one thing - he starts off with his "meta argument" on BKE, but then drops the read for no reason when he moves on to mementoss. Later, he says "BKE isn't scum to him," I would very much like to know what in BKE's filter gave him that impression because (as I outlined in my previous post) BKE's filter looks pretty terrible to me, and the worst parts are the parts that came after Adam's "meta read". Mementoss case, I find pretty unpersuasive, I think that comparing pre-game and in-game enthusiasm levels is a valid tactic. "Not posting much of value" or "not having strong opinions" can be a decent case to make if it's clear and pronounced but it's hardly unique to Mementoss at the moment, I would contend that BKE, Djagulingu, maybe hopeless also fall into that category. Oh, something else - he promises very early on to be like super active, but he is far less active than many other people. Putting the shoe on the other foot, however, his claims about the meta component to your case are pretty compelling. Qualifying that - I know your case is not mainly based on meta anymore. Really, however, unless you disagree with him that his more recent games are different from your claim about his meta, it should be recognized that that element of the case on him is weak. Something else you argue - he did originally take a position against BKE and later backtrack on it. Though I've said above that I don't understand why he backtracked, and though I really want to hear his reasoning, and though I think it's scummy to backtrack from one position and jump on another one without explaining yourself, I do think that at least taking a position is better than not taking a position, even if there is scummy backtracking. Ultimately, here's where I stand. Voting for BKE because I think he's scummier - his positions are less both in number and firmness, and there's also the factor of him doing what I believe is "smokescreening" by talking so much about "how important it is for people to vote in both threads" and then about "how people didn't understand what he meant when he was talking about how important it is for people to vote in both threads", neither of which matter very much. With that said, however, I think a lot of what you say about Adam makes sense, and I wouldn't strenuously object to voting him if that's necessary to get a majority. so yeah looks town to me | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
or they are scum udddies dont worry rhough he is scrub | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
Marv you dobt know me man yku dont know me | ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25546 Posts
On November 14 2012 01:02 iamperfection wrote: do you know any of his scum games? the search function isn't helping me find all his games. idiot cop mafia and Resistance tunnel rats Mafia off the top of my head. | ||
| ||