Liquid City Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Regardless, right now without having done any of above scumhunting I would need to go out of the top of my head and say Kush (It was you up untill vig claim). Distruptive player, weak performance and marv didn't want to lynch him. My main concern with kush is I can't tell if kush is an actual moron or a mafia trying to save himself by acting so much like a moron in order to trick us to believe he's a moron rather then scum. If you can follow that. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
##Vote Hapahauli | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On October 07 2012 22:38 kushm4sta wrote: @prome There are so many afk vets they are not all scum. Probably at least one is scum but they have contributed so little that it's impossible to tell which. These guys are probably quite good at playing mafia. Something as obvious as afking is not a scumtell. That is why I think we should focus on another group of potential mafia. ##fos risk, z boson, coag, sloosh | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I don't know if it's because you 1. Enjoy the attention. 2. Trying to immitate marv. or 3. Think you're playing to your wincondition by purposly clogging up the thread. And it doesn't matter. Understand that there is a fundamental difference between messing with towns head and just spamming for the purpose of making the thread longer. When you reach the point of everyone just automatically jumps over every post you do then it's time to stop because what you're doing isn't good scumplay. It's just abusive of the mechanics of how we can read the thread and the bottom line is it's unethical. If this was my game I would have given both you and marv warnings for the shit you're pulling of because in the end it's just fucking poor sportsmanship. Be fucking silent and die with some fucking dignity. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
This is how I feel and that is all to it. And you might have been forced to be away and unable to scumhunt but you're here now and I'm telling you your case does not impress me the slightest. If this is the best you'll give us I'll lynch you because I know you can do alot better then those sorry lines for scumhunting. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Z-Bozon. clicky. Scroll up and you'll see the votes. It's tied at 7-7 with an hour to the deadline. What does Z-boz do. He unvotes and votes for Coag who as no votes and practicly no chance of beeing lynched. Making the lynch standings 7 on shady and 6 on node. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On October 09 2012 23:41 kushm4sta wrote: @risk z-boson is my top scumread and I would be willing to vote for him. For the 7-7 reason and for his over-reliance on meta except when he completely throws it out the window to switch votes and save a scum. I'm still reading filters but I'm definitely considering Z-boz for todays lynch. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On October 09 2012 23:59 slOosh wrote: My third party read is much much stronger than my scum reads. Maybe because you're not doing anything to find scum. The situation is while some are spending their time searching for scum you're spending yours trying to convince us to lynch a possible third party. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
| ||