TL Mafia LV - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
But Toad seems to have renamed himself to Meapak_Ziphh | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Bugs' cavalier vote is bothering me as well, as is MZ's zealous tunneling. But it'd be stupid to NOT lynch VE..... | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
##unvote | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Wait....what does Zealos' role mean? Does he control all of scum KP or just one? | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Also, kita when was the last time you've ever seen me make a long post? | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Do you want vigs to shoot BH and myself because of the late switch? | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On June 01 2012 23:48 Manason wrote: the complete lack of scum hunting is scummy, but voting for VE is completely understandable, while I did think he was town I wasn't without doubts. Like I've said above, better a VE lynch than a no-lynch, no one was going for Kita so I hopped on the bandwagon so that we didn't have a no-lynch. At no point in a game is it better to kill a townie as opposed to a no-lynch. Wtf kind of logic is that? | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Was wondering where my other half was too | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On June 03 2012 04:44 kitaman27 wrote: Why is it day three and you haven't written a case against anyone this game? And why is the thread so silent -_- Mostly because the main discussions happened during Day 1 and Night 1, and i was out for a lot of that, either feeling unwell or preparing for my trip. If you have any specific person that I should have a look at besides they main candidates then I'll happily do that. Also I suck at writing full cases | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On June 01 2012 23:29 Manason wrote: Ok well there is something I want to make clear right now. I never thought VE was Scum. The reason why I gave him a vote was because I was suspicious by the whole bread crumb deal, added on to the fact that he was going to get lynched and I would rather a VE lynch than a no-lynch. For the people saying that I don't provide any evidence, you guys don't seem to be quoting anything in my filter to prove I'm scum either, although I would give you the benefit of the doubt as it is night, I expect something tomorrow and as a show of good will I will make a complete case against who I think is scum. I know this isn't going to go in my favor and probably harm my chances even more, but I'm lazy and don't want to go digging through peoples filters and making a case. I like to leave that to the vets. Like I've already said though I'll attempt a case D3. On June 01 2012 23:48 Manason wrote: the complete lack of scum hunting is scummy, but voting for VE is completely understandable, while I did think he was town I wasn't without doubts. Like I've said above, better a VE lynch than a no-lynch, no one was going for Kita so I hopped on the bandwagon so that we didn't have a no-lynch. Fuck lynch for information. Fuck whether you can get a switch going to another person so we edefinitely get a lynch. AT NO POINT is it a good idea to vote for a guy to be lynched that you think is not scum, and most definitely not one you think it town. He said he had doubts that VE was town, but that doesn't mean you vote for him...that's like his thinking "well the best way to find out is to kill him!" And imo a no-lynch is so much better than lynching a townie. That's why I took my vote off. I really don't like that thinking. It's the same shit that acro and I suggested in Holy Roman, and that turned out balls. | ||
| ||