EPTA Game of Thrones Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
 /in | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 19 2012 13:34 Curu wrote: That's why he's the sample role PM, because he's obviously not in the game! I can't put someone alive and in the game as a sample PM, that just introduces a whole lot of host-induced WIFOM. Does this mean we should assume there are no Stark bannermen either? Townies are /shudder Lannisters?! | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
 Unfortunately it has nothing to do with Dementors eating Daenerys baby in order to generate infinite facebook spam messages. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
Other than that I cannot really imagine needing to discuss ASOIAF lore during the game. Of course, I may be completely wrong. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
Well, Curu hasn't said I cannot speculate about Petyr's win condition. Remember that this is idle speculation, but I have read the books a number of times and if Petyr is anything, he is untrustworthy. He only serves his own means, so I am inclined to ignore everything he says, including that he is a vanilla townie My hunch is that he must kill Ned Stark and keep Catelyn and/or Sansa alive until the end of the game to win. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
Or am I going overboard and it's just a way of getting people to post at the start of the game? Either way, I'm watching you and risk.nuke. Voting off the bat seems fishy. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
Luckily I have better sources than that. The Ghost of High Heart told me that you are scum. ##vote: Mattchew | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 22 2012 01:17 SamuelLJackson wrote: Yes it's me. I guess you guys don't need me to sign my posts then =P I'll take advantage of this post to inform you that I don't know shit about GoT and I'll strike down with great anger people that are using too much useless flavor in their posts. Hodor? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 22 2012 01:50 DoYouHas wrote: Acrofales reads exactly like newb scum to me from his first posts. His first post reads as already being defensive to me: And then he pulls an OMGUS on 2 different people in a very short period of time. ##Vote: Acrofales Gumshoe, wake up and read day1 carefully. We already know who Littlefinger is 100%. It is given information. Your posts are yet to actually be relevant to the game. What you bolded was basically a follow-up to my question before the game started: On March 20 2012 18:13 Acrofales wrote: Are we allowed to speculate about what Littlefinger's win condition is? I have a hunch Unfortunately it has nothing to do with Dementors eating Daenerys baby in order to generate infinite facebook spam messages. As for the rest, I've calmed down a bit, with later people talking about the random votes. It is my first game (ever) and I was hoping to live past the first day. People instavoting for me got me a bit upset. I am happy to unvote Matthew when a better candidate comes up, the ghost of High Heart is kinda cryptic when it comes to her prophecies It was more of a "if you vote for me, then I'll vote for you"-thing anyway.That said, Matthew, why did you vote for me? Chaoser already had the random vote on me. The 2nd one was just mean. That vote has been the entire contribution to this game, with no explanation or text (except for a lololololol, which is even less useful). | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 22 2012 02:41 gumshoe wrote: Wasn't aware, always thought mayors were just achieved through consensus. In regard to Acrofales I'm sure your well aware that my sympathies always go to first time townies who fuck up at the start, but his response was just pure ombus, which was similar to sloosh and ech in suprisingly normal mini mafia, yet the difference was in that game Sloosh and Ech kept fighting blow for blow because they knew they were townies, Acrofales just sort of clammed up. He's not fighting hard enough, which first time newbie townies tend to do way too much. I'm down for voting for him not because of his silly ombus, but because he backed down when pressured. Acrofales + Show Spoiler + As for the rest, I've calmed down a bit Townies don't just calm down when their under pressure. He's either blue(which is unlikely considering his ombus) a total noob green(also unlikely because he just dropped his hostile tone when the pressure came down) or scum(the most probable) Acrofales seeing as your lynch is getting to be pretty likely maybe you should role claim? It could help your case, also why did you vote for Mattchew in the first place? My reason for not going after Mattchew (or Chaoser for that matter) is precisely because I have since realised it's a random vote to troll me and get a reaction. I think he got quite the reaction, so it succeeded rather well. It also got lots of other people talking, which is a double plus! I am still interested to know why he voted for me, but I am smart enough to know that that is not a reason to suspect him of being mafia off the bat. In fact, it's not enough for me to decide either way. YOU, however, have done nothing but spread misinformation with your posts. You spend three entire posts (not short either) on Littlefinger: + Show Spoiler + On March 22 2012 01:34 gumshoe wrote: Alright just woke up, On the topic of random voting, I don't mind it so long as its a means to an end. It should generate discussion not baseless band wagons  Also on the issue of third party. Isn't little finger sort of irrelevant to town? I mean unless he's going to act like a total dick and try to get himself lynched he really shouldn't be a problem for us, its scum who have to worry about shooting him. Townies look for scum, scum look for third party, lets not do scum's job for them by finding the guy whose potentially the biggest threat to their operation. It's better if little finger stays hidden looks like a helpful blue and soaks up a hit. I'm not saying we shouldn't talk about him, I just don't want to give him away(which as far as we know makes no difference to him) until scum finds him on their own, because just by being there as he is he disrupts and confuses scum. For the record though I think he has to ensure that catelyn survives no matter what(or maybe sansa) and ned dies. Or maybe he just has to identify everyone. It'll be near impossible to confirm our theories until later when we've seen someone act peculiar(like a third party would) even then though like I said before it might still be a good idea to keep Baelish under wraps. Next up, Xatalos, why did you vote for me of all people? Is it because I'm a newer player eg an easy target to pressure/bandwagon? On March 22 2012 01:42 gumshoe wrote: Why waste a hit? I find it hard to believe Scum are going to come forward like that and claim Baelish(it seems to crazy for even a player like Caller) so way I see it where is either a vanilla townie way down below in flea bottom dreaming of some day ruling the kingdom with an iron fist, or hes baelish and we waste a hit/reveal third party to scum. Personally I think we should stay clear of trying to lynch Baelish, unless someone claims there him just before we kill him, in which case they fully deserve to die as we had already decided. If we lynch Where it should be because we think hes scum, not Baelish, do you really think Where is scum this early in the game? On March 22 2012 01:50 gumshoe wrote: Thank you Jackson ( : but keep in mind it is possible(though unlikely considering scums hate for flashy play early on) that Where is scum, we shouldnt just take his word for anything but I agree talking about Baelish is pointless and benefits scum the most. For now we can just ignore Where as if he was just a dumb poster. moving on lets discuss policy(it'll only take a bit and we may as well get it over with early on) do we set a preliminary lynch deadline?(im leaning 8 hours in advance if we do) Do we policy lynch hardcore lurkers?(by hardcore I mean like 3 one liners a cycle, personally for this because lynching lurkers always helps clear the air a bit and they werent helping anyway so nothing really lost) are we going to elect a mayor?( I've never done this before so I dont know how that works) in which you claim not to have read the D1 post properly, but you might equally well be trying to confuse any productive discussion happening in the thread. On top of that you ask about the mayor election, which even I had gathered does not happen unless Curu says it does: more misinformation and confusion to be cleared up, rather than spending time on useful stuff. You end the last post with a request to talk about policy, but instead, as Oberyn put it nicely: On March 22 2012 01:57 Oberyn wrote: If you want to discuss policy, then why are you just giving a bunch of questions? You should share what your actual opinion is. A no-lynch should be out of the question as this person suggests: And now, to top it all off, you decide that I am scummy for backing down from a fight with someone I have no information about one way or the other. I'm inclined to call that an attempt at getting me bandwagoned. On top of that, you ask for me to roleclaim, which serves no point whatsoever, because nobody has any reason to believe me one way or the other this early in the game. So no, I won't play your scummy games. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 22 2012 03:02 risk.nuke wrote: Who wants to kill gumshoe? yey or ney? yey | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
PS. I read through a couple of games before signing up for this one. It's quite different to play than to watch! :D | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 22 2012 05:16 Mattchew wrote: where you at homeslice and why should i think you are not scum Because I'm town. How about you? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
On March 22 2012 06:13 Mattchew wrote: so you ignore the case against you and then come back with a one liner holding no information? i say we lynch acrofales and everyone that has defended him I'm still trying to figure out what case that is. I have already said twice now why I overreacted at first. Although I am starting to think my reaction was the right one. You're clearly not adding anything: you choose to ignore the two posts I made in defense of my overreaction, and now mention some case against me. Post your case clearly and properly and I will respond to you, but at the moment you just seem to be trolling me. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18051 Posts
risk.nuke Please make your case against greymist, rather than just stating you have one. oberyn You have now made two posts with nothing useful in it. This last one starts with an OMGUS against SLJ, continues with a WIFOM about Gumshoe (who has not posted anything since sounding rather scummy. Fear when his plan backfired?) and ends with your only suggestion I agree with (as I said above). Why did you even bother posting this? ON You posted two very short posts, but why not post something more useful than a confirmation that I am town (I do appreciate your opinion). What do you think of Mattchew, Gumshoe or Oberyn? Mattchew I want to spend some more time chewing on this bone. Will post my thoughts later, for now you're still scum and your posts defending your meta have been lackluster and confusing. Lurkers Yes, you: Nicolas, Layabout, Zealos, Sinensis, Evantrees, Lyter and Risen. Why should we not lynch you, you're clearly not contributing anything. | ||
| ||
